Friendstar Supercharged April 25, 2007 Share April 25, 2007 I can never understand how such big SUV can come with drum brakes! How can cost cutting come in expense of safety? Even the new Grand Vitara comes with silly rear drum brakes! Unfortunately most Singaporean buyer either are ignorant or couldn't care less.... My previous car an SUV was using rear drum brakes, and after a small accident which could have been avoided if the rear brakes are better... after that I'd never buy a car / SUV with drum brakes. hey are rear drum brakes really much weaker until it'll compromise safety? i mean i hate drum brakes.. but i'm just wondering, with an ultra strong front disc brakes, the braking will still be at the front during jamming and so the rear drum brakes dont really have to work right? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendstar Supercharged April 25, 2007 Share April 25, 2007 [reply] The seemingly positive reviews from car mags will not help at all. Bless the potential owners of the Fortuner. By nature biased. I have yet to see a review esp. from SG to rap at any of the new models. bad reviews means car companies will not send them cars to test. No tests means no reviews. No review means no readership. No readership means no ad dollars. No ad dollar means no business. Southpark The Dude yes, u look at reviewers like chris****** tan (ST senior correspondent), he reviewed china cars and HE DIDNT EVEN UTTER A bad point of china cars. he's so scared here and there pls dont write reviews. still say that geely ck's engine is refined etc etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendstar Supercharged April 25, 2007 Share April 25, 2007 The point I want to make is that hardware should also extent beyond disc brakes. But none-the-less, I'm glad that you do concur on the point that safe driving has it's critical role in preventing accidents. Just a friendly exchange of views. Hope I didn't get on your nerves too much. Hehehe Cheers!!! bro u really dont understand wat firstcall is talking about. i read i also wan to laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
See_nik Neutral Newbie April 25, 2007 Share April 25, 2007 This problem can be resolved by having a reverse camera. In any event, I think parents should take utmost care of their children, in particular todlers, when they are near vehicles, roads or car parks. Whenever I am with my daughter, I will make sure I carry her when we are near the carpark. Also, I will ensure that she is properly strapped in onto her child seat before moving off. If a parent is not careful, they can still reverse their cars onto their children even if they are driving a mini. It is the driver and not the car. Yupe they even run over their own kid driving forward, e.g. the Taiwanese mother recently in papers. So ..... put camera in front as well? What exactly is the point of driving this huge, heavy, underpowered, fuel guzzling, ungainly Flat-Bed-Truck-convert in metropolitan traffic like SG? You going off-road anytime? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
See_nik Neutral Newbie April 25, 2007 Share April 25, 2007 BTW .... I am sure there are more reasonable alternatives around ...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph883 Neutral Newbie May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 Running over the kid in front is simply attributed to bad driving skills. If you put a lousy woman driver behind the wheel, you will have the same problem whether she is driving a truck or a Mazda 121. BTW, I don't drive an underpowered, ungainly Flat-Bed-Truck-convert. I drive a Pajero . Taking your argument to its logical conclusion, we should all be riding bicycles in Metropolitan Singapore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny123 Clutched May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 Hi, Having driven Matrix, CRV & RAV4 (just sold).... I have now become SUV addict...cant go back to Sedan. Traded-in my RAV4 for Chvrolet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lakeside123 Neutral Newbie May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 Is Captiva korea-built? Fortuner is indonesia-built if I am not wrong.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny123 Clutched May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 (edited) CAPTIVA - GM launched CAPTIVA just last year as a 'World Car' which is being marketed as Winstorm in Korea... 'Holden Captiva' in Australia...as CAPTIVA in Europe..to capture market in Europe and this part of the world. Conceived in US Designed in Korea - joint collaboration GM & DAEWOO (now under GM), Assembled in Thailand Marketed as 'World Car'. A variant of CAPTIVA will be launched in US end of this year. GM/Chevrolet are leaders in building/designing especially SUVs....it's only recently when Americans are switching to small/luxury cars (Japs are ahead in this arena)...they are loosing out....hence launching CAPTIVA world-wide to gain lost ground. Just Test Drive it. You will be plesantly surprised Edited May 14, 2007 by Sunny123 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comfy 1st Gear May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 think its a tom yam built... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comfy 1st Gear May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 no wonder i saw a holden badge on a capitva lookalike running on the streets on melbourne...thought my eyes going kuku Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozebite Neutral Newbie May 14, 2007 Share May 14, 2007 Audi Q7 is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaloryalor 5th Gear May 15, 2007 Share May 15, 2007 All the new Audi model are chio!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloh108 Neutral Newbie May 15, 2007 Share May 15, 2007 Q7 looks good but over-priced. For that price, I rather get a Cayane. Afterall, it's a Porche. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaloryalor 5th Gear May 15, 2007 Share May 15, 2007 Q7 is a 7 seaters rite? Cayane is it 5 seaters pa? Brand wise Porche is better but looks wise, Q7 is nicer. hehe.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubwee Supercharged May 15, 2007 Share May 15, 2007 When to test drive the Q7 , last month ... One word Chio somemore but too bad , too expensive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comfy 1st Gear May 16, 2007 Share May 16, 2007 Q7 3.6l abt 240k...difficult to digest the price... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaloryalor 5th Gear May 16, 2007 Share May 16, 2007 Wow you test drive Q7? Its high-end 200K rite? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Toyota Corolla Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
2014 Corolla Altis - Technical, Features & Use
2014 Corolla Altis - Technical, Features & Use
Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 and Driving Assists - Technical, Features & Use
Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 and Driving Assists - Technical, Features & Use
2022 Toyota Land Cruiser Revealed With New Platform, Twin-Turbo V6
2022 Toyota Land Cruiser Revealed With New Platform, Twin-Turbo V6
2019 12th Gen Toyota Corolla Sedan
2019 12th Gen Toyota Corolla Sedan
2022 4th Generation Toyota Noah & Voxy
2022 4th Generation Toyota Noah & Voxy
Toyota Land Cruiser Mini
Toyota Land Cruiser Mini
Nissan Claims Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Fuel Economy Estimates Are Unrealistic
Nissan Claims Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Fuel Economy Estimates Are Unrealistic