Letter from a Malaysian on China

[Fitvip]

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/185462530

[yellowshaun]

Eh wrong category leh car related meh? =p

[Locknload]

11 minutes ago, yellowshaun said:

Eh wrong category leh car related meh? =p

Next would be the merits of China-made cars. Akan Datang?

[inlinesix]

How to know the writer is Malaysian?
 

Edited October 22, 2020 by inlinesix

[Windwaver]

Interesting article.

[Eyke]

well, it's all great... when you are not the one being oppressed by the China authorities or threatened with "reunification"

[Beregond]

1 hour ago, Fitvip said:

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/185462530

人在做天在看。

Every 1 know who is the biggest aseh---and warmonger in the world😂

[inlinesix]

49 minutes ago, Beregond said:

人在做天在看。

Every 1 know who is the biggest aseh---and warmonger in the world😂

What about 義和團扶清滅洋that resulted in AMDK invade China?

Pls state correct history here

[Watwheels]

Cant blame others when you are weak.

When you cannot stand up for yourself it's on you. Can blame gawd if you want but end of the day you dont want to grow strong and let an old bitch rule over China, that's the whole China at fault. You can even blame the AMDK who sold China the opium and all of that we know from history. What is the lesson learned? It's not like China dont have an army or dont have resources or dont have manpower. China is no small country like Sgp. If you truely want to blame blame it on the Chinese govt back then. What the F they were doing.

Even in the animal world it's big fish eat small fish. Blame the small fishes for bullying the big fish? What are all that blame about? Ask yourself that simple question. 

Are you reading propaganda or are you reading history?

Edited October 22, 2020 by Watwheels

[Spurman]

If qing was strong hor. U and i and many here in mcf would be now china citizens. Indian citizens.. no singapore. No malaysia also

[Beregond]

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/forum-dont-expect-china-to-behave-when-other-countries-dont

The United States has imposed sanctions on senior officials in the International Criminal Court (ICC), including chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused the court of "illegitimate attempts to subject Americans to its jurisdiction".

The Hague-based ICC is currently investigating whether US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The US has criticised the court since its foundation and is one of a dozen states that do not accept the ICC's jurisdiction.

Yet not one word from the US' allies - Australia, New Zealand and Canada - on this injustice.

Imagine the same reaction if China were to do it.

Britain is now on the verge of breaking international law over Brexit in a very "specific and limited" way, but there is zero condemnation from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US.

Yet they were up in vociferous condemnation of China and Hong Kong when they implemented their own security laws. Why is that?

Breaking a law, be it a little bit or wholly, is the same. If Britain does not respect international law, how can it expect others to do so.

By the same means, can China "break international law in a very specific and limited way"?

Some examples of how international law has been used or broken in the past year include how Britain condemned China for its new security law.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said China was in "serious violation" of the country's international obligations. Yet it seems that it is acceptable to everyone for Britain to break international law and undermine trust. Why the double standards?

Likewise, Myanmar should follow the lead of the US by not entertaining any investigations by ICC representatives into the country. If US soldiers cannot be brought to task for their actions in Afghanistan, why the different treatment for Myanmar soldiers, who are accused of committing atrocities against the Rohingya?

Ramoo Puru

[Sotong1977]

2 hours ago, Beregond said:

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/forum-dont-expect-china-to-behave-when-other-countries-dont

The United States has imposed sanctions on senior officials in the International Criminal Court (ICC), including chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused the court of "illegitimate attempts to subject Americans to its jurisdiction".

The Hague-based ICC is currently investigating whether US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The US has criticised the court since its foundation and is one of a dozen states that do not accept the ICC's jurisdiction.

Yet not one word from the US' allies - Australia, New Zealand and Canada - on this injustice.

Imagine the same reaction if China were to do it.

Britain is now on the verge of breaking international law over Brexit in a very "specific and limited" way, but there is zero condemnation from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US.

Yet they were up in vociferous condemnation of China and Hong Kong when they implemented their own security laws. Why is that?

Breaking a law, be it a little bit or wholly, is the same. If Britain does not respect international law, how can it expect others to do so.

By the same means, can China "break international law in a very specific and limited way"?

Some examples of how international law has been used or broken in the past year include how Britain condemned China for its new security law.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said China was in "serious violation" of the country's international obligations. Yet it seems that it is acceptable to everyone for Britain to break international law and undermine trust. Why the double standards?

Likewise, Myanmar should follow the lead of the US by not entertaining any investigations by ICC representatives into the country. If US soldiers cannot be brought to task for their actions in Afghanistan, why the different treatment for Myanmar soldiers, who are accused of committing atrocities against the Rohingya?

Ramoo Puru

Diplomacy is all about serving own interest. Even in the context of Sngapore where it always preach on adhering to rules of international law. In gist, survival instinct.

[inlinesix]

2 hours ago, Beregond said:

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/forum-dont-expect-china-to-behave-when-other-countries-dont

The United States has imposed sanctions on senior officials in the International Criminal Court (ICC), including chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused the court of "illegitimate attempts to subject Americans to its jurisdiction".

The Hague-based ICC is currently investigating whether US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The US has criticised the court since its foundation and is one of a dozen states that do not accept the ICC's jurisdiction.

Yet not one word from the US' allies - Australia, New Zealand and Canada - on this injustice.

Imagine the same reaction if China were to do it.

Britain is now on the verge of breaking international law over Brexit in a very "specific and limited" way, but there is zero condemnation from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US.

Yet they were up in vociferous condemnation of China and Hong Kong when they implemented their own security laws. Why is that?

Breaking a law, be it a little bit or wholly, is the same. If Britain does not respect international law, how can it expect others to do so.

By the same means, can China "break international law in a very specific and limited way"?

Some examples of how international law has been used or broken in the past year include how Britain condemned China for its new security law.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said China was in "serious violation" of the country's international obligations. Yet it seems that it is acceptable to everyone for Britain to break international law and undermine trust. Why the double standards?

Likewise, Myanmar should follow the lead of the US by not entertaining any investigations by ICC representatives into the country. If US soldiers cannot be brought to task for their actions in Afghanistan, why the different treatment for Myanmar soldiers, who are accused of committing atrocities against the Rohingya?

Ramoo Puru

Shall I remind you about Terrex AGAIN?

[Jamesc]

Why he comment on China?

Bloddy kapoh.

Comment on his own country lah.

Malaysia boleh.

Malaysia politics so much more interesting.

I hope he is happy paying his tax for the gas pipe line in East Malaysia that never got finished building.

Guan Eng: RM8.25b payments made by previous govt for two gas pipeline projects, despite only 13% of work completed

KUALA LUMPUR (June 5): Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng revealed today that the previous Barisan Nasional government had made payments amounting to RM8.25 billion for the multi-product pipeline (MPP) and the Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline (TSGP) projects, despite only 13% of work completed for both projects.

These payments — representing 87.7% of the total project value for both projects of RM9.41 billion — were made despite an average completion rate of only 13%, with another two years of the contracts to go, the minister in a statement today.

[Jamesc]

I suggest he leaves Malaysia and go and live in the country he loves so much.

If Japan let me live in Japan and make documentaries in Hokkaido I go tomorrow.

 

 

[inlinesix]

10 minutes ago, Jamesc said:

Why he comment on China?

Bloddy kapoh.

Comment on his own country lah.

Malaysia boleh.

Malaysia politics so much more interesting.

I hope he is happy paying his tax for the gas pipe line in East Malaysia that never got finished building.

Guan Eng: RM8.25b payments made by previous govt for two gas pipeline projects, despite only 13% of work completed

KUALA LUMPUR (June 5): Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng revealed today that the previous Barisan Nasional government had made payments amounting to RM8.25 billion for the multi-product pipeline (MPP) and the Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline (TSGP) projects, despite only 13% of work completed for both projects.

These payments — representing 87.7% of the total project value for both projects of RM9.41 billion — were made despite an average completion rate of only 13%, with another two years of the contracts to go, the minister in a statement today.

I suspect the writer is NOT MALAYSIAN

[Meanmachine]

i love history and literature, simply the best is yet to come, whether the write is malaysian or not, does not really matter, what matter most is the reality of it and pure delight to read and digest, they are some fact in the opium war in China instigated by foreign forces which drugged the Chinese population and the Anglo french war gang-up fight with British troop and Yankees i do remb . . . How nasty yet demon period & the Chinese lost of lives were unaccountable for . . . let it be history in the making & let our children know the truth.

[inlinesix]

1 hour ago, Meanmachine said:

i love history and literature, simply the best is yet to come, whether the write is malaysian or not, does not really matter, what matter most is the reality of it and pure delight to read and digest, they are some fact in the opium war in China instigated by foreign forces which drugged the Chinese population and the Anglo french war gang-up fight with British troop and Yankees i do remb . . . How nasty yet demon period & the Chinese lost of lives were unaccountable for . . . let it be history in the making & let our children know the truth.

What about 義和團扶清滅洋that resulted in AMDK invade China?