Ct3833

On 1/26/2024 at 10:52 AM, Typicalcarguy said:

Of course can lah! No problem!

can help me build a Rolex?

Cam car is wrong to have changed lane dangerously. Suzuki driver is also petty, he can just slow down a bit to give way, and he was even more wrong to stop and get out of his car just to confront  cam car driver . "Why you cut into my lane", does the answer matter anymore ? 

97/98 is already so cheap there, why bother to be a cheapskate to save that few cents to pump 95?

well, has accumulated fines from LTA, Police force, URA, HDB, but none of the authorities is bothered to go after him, it goes to show how sloppy the government service can be, and this will indirectly encourage him to fraud more laws, after all it is FOC. 

On 3/31/2022 at 9:41 AM, Lala81 said:

The G63 driver not paying attention, didnt realise the van just behind him on the right. He probably wanted to change to right lane at the traffic light. Realised the van was there. Indecision, didnt brake in time for the traffic light.

 

Being able to  afford a G63 is a strong statement by itself,  letting  alone the power under the hood, why bother with a van ? 

14 hours ago, Fitvip said:

Why no one realise that it was the FD driver that caused the near accident? Praise what?

The civic did not rush and he was careful enough to stop immediately. It was the bike who was speeding and beat the red light when cam car had already came to a full stop. The bike could have gone by now if the civic did not stop, he should have turned back to thank the civic 10 times. 

3 hours ago, ER-3682 said:

Could be both are Brothers,VRN 60 & 6060....

not important, both should be given fine and demerit points.

42 minutes ago, Xiaohongwrx said:

Aiyoh, always must have that someone in a group chat sending screenshots out.

This is what a friend is for. MCF is a safer place. 😅

7 hours ago, Jamesc said:

Looks like his MIL was in the car behind chasing him.

Good switcharoo and he lost her.

MIL was in the back seat, and he could shake her off no matter how fast he drove. 

so far no comments from TP? 

Ok ok, change the title to ....

" The only 5 reasons why the Passat is a better car than yours".

59 minutes ago, ToyotaShuttle said:

just one side of the story. What did cam car do to the accord before this?

both could be at fault.

You mean this is an allowable  behavior if cam car had done something wrong or in certain stupid manner?😄😄

1 hour ago, Watwheels said:

Driver and cyclist both have that self entitlement mindset of they are in the right. So how?

We dont need to guess hard who will suffer the most in the event of an accident. The cyclist will suffer physical injuries and may die from it. The car will suffer some scratches maybe but the insurance payout to the cyclist may be high. So to put it plainly the driver's pocket will suffer.

This is what I think. Some cyclists are idiots.

 

Audi is wrong to have cut the cyclist path but cyclist is wrong to think that he is invincible. If any, a cyclist would likely  be missed by driver unintentionally,   like he is invisible. 

while now it is still not an offence to ride in a void deck,  ridding recklessly or carelessly yes, so the authority should do something to punish this guy, otherwise, we can expect to see similar incidents again........and again. 

this is the expected consequence of trying to pass a key of a powerful performance car to a 27 year old young chap....