Posted 20 March 2007 - 10:49 PM
Noticed these when I was clicking around..
Wonder whats the deal with these
iPhone or iMia?
Posted 20 March 2007 - 10:59 PM
probably showroom car and somemore wagon.....cannot sell off to new buyers then sell as second hand car lor....
by the way....its got an ugly butt...haha
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:09 PM
waoh! tt's a pretty good price for this car. dun noe got gimmick or not
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:11 PM
wah lau A3 1.6l selling for 89888 ? a bit over priced for a 1.6l leh .....
but why did sgcarmart classify them as hatchback ? its a wagon ....
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:27 PM
It's not a wagon. It's a sportsback, which means a hatchback in audi speak.
90k is quite a good deal. Could be a showroom model or a test drive mule.
.:.:.:.:.::: Shoot the driver... Not the car :::.:.:.:.:.
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:35 PM
oic ... sorry cannot afford to drive audi. me driving its poorer cousin ....
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:43 PM
This A3 Sportback is still sitting on the MK4 platform and SR engine... a little old for that premium... $90k can get u a MK5 FSI leh, why pay so much for the bits and pieces equipment here and there together with some so-called premium quality? Worst of all, its a 2nd hand.... not worth it, i think most earnings go into the 2nd hand car dealer's pocket.
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:46 PM
I knew that I should not compare this.
For 90k, why not get a Mark X (maybe 85k even) with a similar OMV (Mark X OMV about 28k to 30k) brand new with 2.5L V6 engine, rear wheel drive...
1.6L at 90k?? Well...its an Audi.
Lower road tax compared to Maek X but maintenance??
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:49 PM
no issue wif maintenance since this is a 2nd hand car anyway. Not likely u'll bring it back to Premium ....
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:50 PM
MK4 platform & SR engine .....
I am indeed driving its budget cousin
much cheaper some more....
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:52 PM
The class is different, quality is really different. Really cannot compare this way. Its just like why people choose to eat a plate of $3.80 Boon Tong Kee chicken rice when they can eat a $2 one in the hawker centre....
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:57 PM
i like your analogy of chix rice ...
which made me a bit hungry
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:57 PM
M also driving its cheaper cousin as well, exactly sitting on the same platform and engine but under its biological parents' name..
but i m better off laughing to the bank with an extra $10k or so still in my pocket.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:02 AM
That is why I say cannot compare this way.
How about paying a little more and get a brand new Volvo S40? It should be much closer to compare this way.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:07 AM
Mmmm... Do agree, notwithstanding the fact that its quite a fair bit of extra though. I still think its pretty clear that this $90k is definitely over priced.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:10 AM
I heard the 4 star (i dont know, could be 5 star) chicken rice is better. go have ur supper lah
OOps.. sorry to have strayed from the topic.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:20 AM
check this out,
came across this one while going thru sgcarmart, like the Audi u posted, the mileage is super low, this one should be a showroom unit oso, but hor it is oredy 8 mth old liao.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:23 AM
5star chicken rice is indeed better than BTK's (imho).
Edited by Carcraze, 21 March 2007 - 12:23 AM.
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:26 AM
i think the price stated is after cashback.
"Under Premium Warranty! Mileage 30km Only! Accident Free! $7000 Cashback, Book a Test Drive with Us Now!"
a brand new 1.6 A3 would cost around 105K
Posted 21 March 2007 - 02:48 PM
How can compare Audi and MarkX...
Audi is always my favourite conti car. Nice design with an excellent drive too
I dream my painting, and then I paint my dream. - [ Vincent Van Gogh ]Click to view my Webpage