HOUSENUMBER Neutral Newbie December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 (edited) well the price are quite similar for both of these model so wonder u guys would chose jap car or conti car and yea which is easier to maintain Edited December 10, 2009 by HOUSENUMBER ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byond 1st Gear December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 polo for better build quality... mz 2 for easier maintanence... if got deeper pockets of cos will take polo..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladykillerz 4th Gear December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 I will go for VW polo if you are referring to the 1.2TSi and not the 1.4 one. Tested 1.4 and know the underpower feel.~ You should try too..~ Even so, I will not choose Mz 2........ just my opinion..~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSENUMBER Neutral Newbie December 10, 2009 Author Share December 10, 2009 yes opinion is wad i am seeking for Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladykillerz 4th Gear December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 Frankly speaking, now VW price is good. You should go ahead if you are not power hungry person. At least, it's a VW leh.. =p Worth it especially with the current price tag..~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fcw75 Hypersonic December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 Wait for the 1.2 TSI one. I am. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennisk Clutched December 10, 2009 Share December 10, 2009 i test drove both cars , i will go for M2, if you are referring to the 1.4 polo. What actually you are looking out for? go for a spin and you will know what you want, asking for opinion might be subjective. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverspark Neutral Newbie December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 wait for the 1.2t first then test drive both. like dat u will have a better idea of which one u prefer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangadrool Supersonic December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 (edited) You should consider Daihatsu Sirion 1.5 option also. It has > 4 airbags > 4 star Euro NCAP crash rating > front passenger airbag can be self-disabled (DIY) > 3 rear headrests fitted with 3-point seat belts > costs only abt 50K+ > very spacious inside and can transport 40" LCD easily (with room to spare). Even large bulky CRT TV can be easily loaded in too. Rear doors sound hollow, but can be solved. Sheet metal used is actually quite solid, does not collect dings and dents easily (though not as solid as conti, is better than most other Jap). Downside is, softly sprung average suspension and lousy stock tyres that does not inspire confidence round corners. Change these to better ones and it will be a ride that will bring smiles on your face for many years to come. Edited December 11, 2009 by Kangadrool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSENUMBER Neutral Newbie December 11, 2009 Author Share December 11, 2009 will the TSI 1.2 polo cost around the smae price as 1.4 polo? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiannshan Clutched December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 well the price are quite similar for both of these model so wonder u guys would chose jap car or conti car and yea which is easier to maintain I will choose VW as well. its conti and furthermore, i have heard of lousy FCs for mazda cars from friends though i never see it myself b4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiadaw 6th Gear December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 (edited) Does Mazda 2 have ESP? I know polo have tonnes of safety feature, some I don't even know what they do? I think build quailty, & feature/equipement list, & handling, the polo are better. Exterior is subjective. Not sure about power. Polo also come with 7-speed DSG option which I believe the Mazda is standard 4 speed auto, but I could be wrong. Also if you are considering Mazda 2, why not check out the Fiesta, which is build on the same plaform but with improved handling. Just don't chose a car base on popularity on SG road. Our citizens have a habit of following the trend & being conservative like choosing familair brands. SO more not nesserity = better. In the end, its your call. Edited December 11, 2009 by Kiadaw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 (edited) I will choose VW as well. its conti and furthermore, i have heard of lousy FCs for mazda cars from friends though i never see it myself b4. My mz 2 (1.5 Auto) is giving me an FC of abt 13+km/L. 60% highway. Seriously.. i don't know whats up with buying the Polo juz becos its a conti brand (its not as if we are talking about a premium conti here). Wait till your warranty expire and you will know how much the spares gonna cost u. Edited December 11, 2009 by Rickster Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 Go for mazda if you want more oopmh. The manual version gives u 0-100 in 9+ sec. Get the polo if comfort is what you are looking for. Both the cars are Euroncap 5 stars. Mazda 2R variant and above have 6 airbags. Not sure about the Polo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 My mz 2 (1.5 Auto) is giving me an FC of abt 13+km/L. 60% highway. We will have to wait till mid Jun 2010 before we know the FC of Polo... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vextan 1st Gear December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 you wont regret choosing a mazda. in fact, i have yet to come across one who does ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 you wont regret choosing a mazda. in fact, i have yet to come across one who does ! Yeah... if they can overcome all the Neg point about choosing Mazda, they got nothing to regret. Same with those who choose proton... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear December 11, 2009 Share December 11, 2009 Frankly speaking, now VW price is good. You should go ahead if you are not power hungry person. At least, it's a VW leh.. =p Worth it especially with the current price tag..~ A: "What car you drive?" B: "A Volksawgen! " (beaming with pride) ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Volkswagen Polo GTI
Volkswagen Polo GTI
6th gen 2018 VW Polo is in Singapore
6th gen 2018 VW Polo is in Singapore
Autocar UK reviews Polo GTI
Autocar UK reviews Polo GTI
2010 Polo Owner
2010 Polo Owner
VW Polo rams KL Police car and flees..
VW Polo rams KL Police car and flees..
Buy VW Polo more worthwhile or Jetta?
Buy VW Polo more worthwhile or Jetta?
VW Passat & Polo made in China
VW Passat & Polo made in China
Squeaky noise upon lifting handbrake/footbrake
Squeaky noise upon lifting handbrake/footbrake