Jump to content

NASA lands 1-TON Rover on Mars


CKP
 Share

Recommended Posts

'Enormous step forward' as NASA lands rover on Mars

 

By Romain Raynaldy | AFP News

Edited by CKP
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

awesome .

 

Ya, particularly the entry, descent and landing phase.

 

"If anything ONE thing does not work, it's game over"

 

[cool]

 

Edited by CKP
Link to post
Share on other sites

awesome .

 

 

good..next time no need fight for more parking lots... <_< <_<

 

but this is truly an awesome day for mankind. Now to see what kinds of creatures arise from Mars [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop]

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

i rem it comes with a laser beam that can blast stones to pieces

 

8 minute into the long clip, you see the laser in action.

 

Basically, the rover's laser blasts the rocks such that the lights emitted

by the now "heated" rock will be analyzed by its camera.

 

Sorry, there is no rock exploding into pieces or melting. [:p]

 

[cool]

Edited by CKP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got shadow anot? Is this conjured up and filmed in movie studio? [:p]

 

Many still wonder if they did ever land on the moon, let alone sending something to mars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think NASA detect something there.....

 

Dark of the Mars...... [laugh]

 

 

u think transformer part 3 ah [:p] [:p]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now to see what kinds of creatures arise from Mars [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop]

 

More intelligent ones than the rover driver.

 

alien.bmp

 

[laugh]

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those UFO that landed on earth, could also be aliens Landrover.

US could have adopted the technology.

 

It's weird that earth technology is so good that we can land on moon in 69, and now so many landings on Mars.

Yet, US tech co is fighting over patents and gadgets with Koreans.

How on earth can a super tech that can land on Mars, can produce so low tech gadgets like iPhone or GM unreliable cars?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The method to land "opportunity" and "spirit" have been proven and tested. That landing method was neater and less sophisticated than the landing of "curiosity". Wonder why NASA did not use the same method as in the landing of "opportunity" and "spirit". Curiosity is much heavier?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...