Jump to content

PE by-election - Police issues stern warning to SPH and ST


Altivo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mods, I've checked and all PE by-elections thread are locked. So have to start a new thread.

 

After many months of waiting, the verdict is out. [lipsrsealed]

 

 

Police issues stern warning to SPH and ST editor for Punggol East report

 

Published on Jun 20, 2013

4:36 PM

 

Police on Thursday issued a stern warning to The Straits Times (ST) editor Warren Fernandex and Singapore Press Holdings, over a January report on the Punggol East by-election that was published in the newspaper.

 

By Rachel Chang

 

Police on Thursday issued a stern warning to The Straits Times (ST) editor Warren Fernandex and Singapore Press Holdings, over a January report on the Punggol East by-election that was published in the newspaper.

 

The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) said in a statement on Thursday that the stern warning was issued in lieu of prosecution for the offence of publishing a poll after the writ of election had been issued.

 

The article, headlined "ST Poll: more rooting for PAP," presented the views of 50 Punggol East residents that reporters had interviewed."

 

The publication of polls from the day the writ of election is issued until the close of polling stations on Polling Day is prohibited by the Parliamentary Elections Act.

 

The AGC statement said that the publication of the article "was attributable to neglect on the part of Mr Fernandez."

 

SPH said Mr Fernandez and Mr Patrick Daniel, the editor-in-chief of the media group's English and Malay newspapers division, presented themselves at the Central Police Division earlier in the morning to receive the written warnings.

 

"The Straits Times newsroom co-operated fully with the police during their investigations and accepted that there was an internal lapse that led to the publication of the poll results," said SPH.

 

"It has always been our approach that when we get something wrong, we acknowledge it, put it right, and strive to do better," said Mr Fernandez.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

AGC should make an example of SPH. Why should they be let off with just a warning when they are a big corporation? They are sending the wrong message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After soooo long???? Ha ha ha ha

 

the issue is not the length of time..but rather no prosecution for the offence..and the timing is perfect by using the haze as a "smoke screen" to release this particular news

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah boy ah, come, got to knock you on your head a bit to show show ok. Dun worry no pain pain, just wayang only.

 

Kock. Ok. Lets move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AGC should make an example of SPH. Why should they be let off with just a warning when they are a big corporation? They are sending the wrong message.

 

Oh dear... You first day here ah? [rolleyes]

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

They have to come up with a way to deal with such irresponsible behaviour hence the MDA $50,000 licensing fee is born. Now you know why it took so long to have a verdict.

Edited by Watwheels
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

AGC should make an example of SPH. Why should they be let off with just a warning when they are a big corporation? They are sending the wrong message.

 

When you are on the right side, u can do no wrong no matter what it is

Link to post
Share on other sites

AGC should make an example of SPH. Why should they be let off with just a warning when they are a big corporation? They are sending the wrong message.

Singapore :D

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...