Jump to content

Do you trust the police?


Kusje
 Share

Recommended Posts

To all honesty, I rather trust our police than any other country

 

Name one country that you honestly can trust the police?

Maybe Japan?
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't the police let him have a copy his own statement? It's so that he can ensure they don't tamper with it.

Did Wham state clearly that his reason for not signing is to ensure no future tampering? Seems like he did not give any justification for not signing, according to the article. Just says he wants a copy, and when not given, refused to sign.

Edited by Sosaria
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Wham state clearly that his reason for not signing is to ensure no future tampering? Seems like he did not give any justification for not signing, according to the article. Just says he wants a copy, and when not given, refused to sign.

Why does he need to give an excuse? He's not asking for confidential information. All he wants is a copy of a document that he is being forced to sign.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does he need to give an excuse? He's not asking for confidential information. All he wants is a copy of a document that he is being forced to sign.

That's a legit worry of course, but if it's SOP not to give a copy then it's up to him to effect a change by clearly voicing out the reason why a copy is justified. If just keep quiet, he won't get his copy and the facts get twisted to make him appear unreasonable.
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a legit worry of course, but if it's SOP not to give a copy then it's up to him to effect a change by clearly voicing out the reason why a copy is justified. If just keep quiet, he won't get his copy and the facts get twisted to make him appear unreasonable.

 

Honestly it is your kind of thinking that causes us citizens to be treated like dirt. Everything also just refer to SOP even if the SOP is ridiculous.

 

Would you sign any other contract w/o keeping a copy for yourself?

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Japan?

I have experienced nasty Japanese in Japan and Japanese expatriates here in Singapore. But I must say, generally their culture and upbringing when young does makes a difference. I am not sure once they open up to more foreigners sulituation will be the same since these input come from different background.

 

Generally, when people are less stress, they are nice. This can be experienced from the rural folks. If you have to compete for a living, i guess survival instinct will override everything.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

mxgs-837-unicycle-policewomans-patrol-ak

 

 

 

Do you trust this NiHon BiJin  [inlove]  :wub:

this type let them lape

 

30D6150A00000578-0-image-a-30_1454498146

 

hqdefault.jpg

 

 

hqdefault.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

netizens-going-nuts-about-this-beautiful

 

 

I trust them  [inlove]

 

difficult to steal their panty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Senior investigation officer committed sex offences against suspects in police custody, gets jail and caning

SINGAPORE: A senior investigation officer with the Singapore Police Force (SPF) committed sexual offences against female suspects in police custody, ordering one woman to perform sex acts on him in the interview room.

Lee Sze Chiat, 39, was sentenced to a year's jail and one stroke of the cane on Tuesday (Nov 19) for acts that the prosecution called "a callous dereliction of duty".

Advertisement

He pleaded guilty to one charge of molesting a female suspect and another of engaging in conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline, by engaging in sexual activity with a female detainee in police custody.

The court heard that Lee joined the force in July 2002 and was a senior investigation officer at Jurong Police Divisional Headquarters, with the rank of senior staff sergeant, at the time of the offences.

Two female suspects, whose identities are protected by gag order, were arrested on Dec 6, 2017, on suspicion that they had been providing sexual services.

They were escorted to Jurong Police Divisional Headquarters where Lee worked to assist in police investigations.

Advertisement

Even though Lee was not rostered or formally assigned to perform any investigative duties in relation to the arrests of the women, aged 28 and 29, he heard about the arrests and offered to help.

The investigative team accepted his offer and forwarded the arrest report of the two women to him.

At about 11pm, Lee escorted the 28-year-old woman from the lockup in the basement to an interview room.

He closed the door behind him and interviewed her in the room, before asking her twice to approach him to give him a massage.

The woman refused, and Lee stood up and locked the door of the interview room, said Deputy Public Prosecutors Marshall Lim and Niranjan Ranjakunalan.

He then went over to the bench where the woman was seated and told her that there were no closed-circuit television cameras installed inside the room.

He presented his back to her and asked her to massage him. While reluctant, the woman ultimately agreed, as she did not want to turn down the request from a police officer. 

The woman raised her voice and told Lee to stop when he started molesting her chest. He told her to lower her voice, then put her hands on his privates and asked for "services".

The woman pulled her hands away and told Lee to stop, shocked that he would make such a request in the police station.

Lee also pulled open the woman's collar to peek at her chest.

HE TARGETED SECOND WOMAN IN ESCALATING OFFENCES

After this interview, Lee took over custody of the second victim from another investigation officer.

Halfway through the interview in the room, Lee instructed the 29-year-old woman to walk over to him and masturbate him.

The woman was reluctant but agreed as she did not want to turn down a request from a police officer.

After this, Lee asked her to perform a sex act on him, and she again did so despite her reluctance.

The first victim told another investigation officer about what had happened a few days after the incident, and was advised to report the matter, which she did.

DISQUIETING CASE: PROSECUTION

The prosecution had asked for at least 13 months' jail and one stroke of the cane, calling the facts in this case "disquieting".

"A senior investigation officer tasked with investigating criminal offences ... elected to commit them instead," said the prosecutors. "Despite his oath to uphold the law, the accused wilfully chose to flout it while he was carrying out duties in his capacity as a police officer and in the premises of police headquarters."

"It is shocking that a police officer of the accused's seniority could commit such abhorrent offences," said the prosecution.

An officer tasked with upholding the law who flouts it must be dealt with sternly to send a strong message to others in his position that such conduct will not be tolerated, they added.

For using criminal force to outrage a woman's modesty, Lee could have been jailed for up to two years, fined, caned or given any combination of such penalties.

For engaging in conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline under the Police Force Act, he could have been jailed for up to six months, fined a maximum of S$1,000 or both.

In reply to CNA's queries, SPF said that Lee had been "interdicted from service" since Dec 26, 2017.

"Officers of SPF are not only expected to uphold the law but maintain the highest standards of conduct and integrity. We deal severely with officers who break the law, including charging them in court," said police. 

The authorities said they take the safety of those taken into police custody "very seriously" and that there are measures to ensure that such individuals receive "safe and fair treatment". 

"This was an isolated case and does not represent the professional and disciplined conduct of the rest of our SPF officers."

SPF began disciplinary proceedings against Lee following his conviction on Tuesday. 


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/police-investigation-officer-sex-offences-suspect-custody-12107814

 

Is this the reason why we cannot have video cameras in the interrogation room? 

  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

why 1 stroke only? custodial whip? 

normal guy force a woman to perform sex act on him can get away with just 1 whip? .. police force a woman to perform sex act while abusing the authority given by police force...  how that is deemed a lesser act to punish is beyond me...  
 

  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, SuPerBoRed said:

why 1 stroke only? custodial whip? 

normal guy force a woman to perform sex act on him can get away with just 1 whip? .. police force a woman to perform sex act while abusing the authority given by police force...  how that is deemed a lesser act to punish is beyond me...  
 

things are going to come full circle for this SSG ...

after he is released from jail and SPF, he will have lots of "old friends" looking for him.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuPerBoRed said:

why 1 stroke only? custodial whip? 

normal guy force a woman to perform sex act on him can get away with just 1 whip? .. police force a woman to perform sex act while abusing the authority given by police force...  how that is deemed a lesser act to punish is beyond me...  
 

I think it isn't just because he is police.

More likely it is because those women are whores (allegedly) so they are considered lesser.

Edited by Kusje
  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Watwheels said:

These women are pros or tourists? 😂

 

"Working Women"... Not tourists. 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...