Jump to content

JD Power Says Korean Cars Beat US and Europe in Quality


kobayashiGT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Internal Moderator

JD Power Says Korean Cars Beat US and Europe in Quality!

Sources: https://www.wired.com/story/jd-power-korean-cars-beat-us-europe-quality/

 

Transpo_G70_TA-518126.jpg

 

Ask the average car buyer who makes the most reliable vehicles, and they’ll likely start with Japanese automakers, followed by the Germans and the Americans, and ending with the Koreans. Going by the results of this year’s JD Power Initial Quality Survey, though, that’s all wrong. “It’s almost the complete reverse,” says Dave Sargent, who oversees Power's vehicle quality research. The change in fortunes rides largely on how automakers have handled two big technological trends: proliferating infotainment screens and advanced driver assistance features.

 

The ranking, based on the number of problems owners of new vehicles report in the first three months, puts Genesis, Hyundai’s luxury brand, in the number one spot, with 63 problems per 100 vehicles. Kia and Hyundai are right behind, making for an all-Korean top three. The next three slots go to the Americans—Ford, Lincoln, Chevrolet—with Lexus and Toyota after them. All these brands score better than the industry average of 93 problems per 100 vehicles. Below that bar, you’ll find the Europeans, including Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Volvo, and Volkswagen. In the bottom two spots are Land Rover and Jaguar. A spokesman for those two brands, both owned by India’s Tata Motors, said that the addition of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto has reduced complaints around infotainment issues, and that it's working to improve those scores. A Mercedes-Benz representative notes that this JD Power survey "doesn’t reflect the total ownership experience," but that it's helpful for "finetuning" its work.

 

The results don’t surprise Sargent. “This is not a one-year phenomenon,” he says. The Korean automakers have consistently improved their cars’ quality in recent years, especially around the infotainment systems that offer a combination of navigation, music, and voice calling features. The Korean manufacturers offer relatively simple systems that do the basics well, even if they skimp on next-generation ideas like gesture controls. That matches Consumer Reportsmost recent infotainment system ranking, which listed Genesis, Hyundai, and Kia among its favorites. It gave the top score to Tesla, which JD Power doesn’t include in its rankings, due to a lack of data.

 

post-137774-0-47320200-1561006361.png

 

The “problems” that consumers report tend to fall into two buckets. Some are defects that affect individual cars, like a headlamp that goes out. Others are related to the design of a vehicle, like a hard-to-use voice recognition system for doing things like placing calls and set navigation destinations. Today’s cars have far fewer defects than their predecessors did a decade ago, Sargent says, and mass manufacturers match the luxury brands on that count.

 

So drivers are more focused on the things that bug them about their vehicles. That exposes the luxury automakers to criticism, Sargent says, because they offer more features that may not work perfectly or be easy to understand.

 

This year’s survey found a small increase in what Sargent calls “traditional problems” like bad paint jobs and brake and suspension noises. That may be because, as car sales have slowed, vehicles are spending more time in the elements before going home with a customer—an effect known as “lot rot.”

 

Transpo_Genesis_Inline1.jpg

 

While infotainment systems are responsible for more problems than any other category, they’re also where automakers made the biggest overall improvement since 2018. Industry-wide, the survey says, the systems are getting less glitchy and easier to use.

 

The new bad boy looks to be driver assistance systems, which for JD Power includes things like basic cruise control, lane departure warnings, and “semiautonomous” systems like Cadillac Super Cruise. As these features become more prevalent, more consumers are having trouble understanding how they work, or criticizing when they do and don’t intervene. And yes, studies show that drivers in the US and Europe often overestimate what their “semiautonomous” cars can do—setting them up for disappointment.

 

Overall, Sargent says, the encouraging thing is just how reliable new cars are these days. The 2019 industry average of 93 problems per 100 vehicles represents a 14 percent drop over the 2009 figure. Volvo, he notes, is in 28th place, out of 32. “I drive a Volvo,” he says. “I love it.”

 

 

The Jap & the Germans must be very angry now. Korean wan shui! Anyway, I found this video and the G70 is superb!

 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an initial quality survey. Just into 3 months of owning the car. Actually what most people are interested in are the longer term quality surveys... up to 5 years, and maybe even 10 years. But I don't think anyone does that kind of survey.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we must look at the whole picture as this study does not represent the whole car ownership experience or long term experience.

 

And because due to car trends car makers are constantly introducing gadgets and new features into their cars to make them more attractive to buy. These features and gadgets will increase the number of failure rates.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we must look at the whole picture as this study does not represent the whole car ownership experience or long term experience.

 

And because due to car trends car makers are constantly introducing gadgets and new features into their cars to make them more attractive to buy. These features and gadgets will increase the number of failure rates.

But what shouldn't be masked behind this gadget galore and their attendant first to market failures is that for many of the established German marques, the simple basic reliabilities don't seem as robust... these are things like oil being consumed, simple electric motor failures for powered parts, gearbox complications, too many electronic gremlins that keeps you sending the car to the workshop to rectify otherwise you can't drive the car... while these can be explained away as being on the cutting edge of technology and hence teething problem, it detracts from the ownership experience. In this respect, perhaps the greater conservatism of the Japanese and even the Korean brands seems better advised since you get to actually drive your car rather than have it sent to the workshop to always sort out an array of electronic warnings which may or may not be that important...
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...