Jump to content

SINGAPORE fails to meet international standards for political and human rights


Singer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Neutral Newbie

July 9, 2008 storyTools.gif S'pore should free courts from govt influence: lawyers group

 

SINGAPORE should free its courts from any government influence and elevate human rights standards to international levels, the world's largest legal association said.

 

The International Bar Association's (IBA) human rights arm expressed concern over the limitations of freedom of expression and the independence of Singapore courts in a 72-page report released late in London on Tuesday.

 

'In particular, democratic debate and media comment are extremely restricted and government officials have initiated numerous successful defamation suits against both political and media critics,' said the association's executive director Mr Mark Ellis.

 

The global legal association noted that while the city-state had a good reputation when adjudicating commercial cases that did not involve members of the ruling People's Action Party (PAP), when it came to matters regarding PAP litigants 'there are concerns about an actual or apparent lack of impartiality'.

 

The London-based body of more than 30,000 member lawyers globally also said that while Singapore fared well in commercial and economic rankings, it fared poorly in press freedom rankings, which it said was a concern given that a free press can generate important dialogue on issues.

 

'Singapore cannot continue to claim that civil and political rights must take a back seat to economic rights, as its economic development is now of the highest order,' the report said.

 

'The International Bar Association Human Rights Institute strongly encourages Singapore to engage with the international community in a more constructive manner, and to take steps to implement international standards of human rights,' it said.

The Singapore government did not immediately comment.

Defamation suits

Singapore, where the IBA held its annual conference last year, is among the most developed nations in Asia, with the second highest GDP per capita after Japan.

 

However, media and human rights groups such as Amnesty International have criticised the government for restricting freedom of expression and using defamation lawsuits to financially cripple political opponents.

 

In a list of 18 recommendations, the IBA urged the Singapore government to ratify the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ease restrictions on the media and ensure that its courts are free from government influence.

 

IBA executive director said in a statement Singapore should be a leader in human-rights, and its advancement would be complementary to the city-state's future prosperity.

The IBA also noted that some publications, including The Economist and the Financial Times, have paid out-of-court settlements to avoid defamation lawsuits.

 

The government says these lawsuits are needed to protect its reputation.

The legal body suggested the government set limits on defamation payouts in cases initiated by government officials.

 

At the convention last October, Singapore's Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said the city-state's citizens were free to read whatever they wanted.

 

He said Singapore was built on the rule of law and did not tolerate corruption, in contrast to the surrounding region, where 'money politics' was a way of life.

 

That meant defamation action may be taken against those who impute dishonesty among government officials, in order to clear any doubts, he said. -- REUTERS, AFP.

 

http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2BNews/...ory_256122.html

 

 

 

the IBA will face another defamation suit from MIW... sly.gifsweatdrop.giflipsrsealed.gif

[/color]

Let's see if there is any freedom of expression here.... be civil though thumbsup.gif

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

At the convention last October, Singapore's Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said the city-state's citizens were free to read whatever they wanted

 

Ahh... but are people free to WRITE what they wanted? [sly]

Link to post
Share on other sites

In recent court case against the Chees, the emperor testified in court after being cross-examined that the judiciary in Singapore is fair and independent citing a letter written by the IBA in praising Singapore's judiciary system. Subsequently, the IBA denied they ever send such a letter..The media in singapore all kept mum abt this...he is now being asked to show this letter but could not do so at this stage..will continue to act blur and the matter will get swept under the carpet.. [shakehead]

Link to post
Share on other sites

He said Singapore was built on the rule of law and did not tolerate corruption, in contrast to the surrounding region, where 'money politics' was a way of life.

 

meaning to say countries like indonesia all corrupted with money politics...

 

HEY!!! but their polis can catch so many terrorists leh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

reminds me of a movie.. can't remember what movie.

 

"the people are hungry for leadership, give them any leader and they will take it"

"the people don't know what is leadership, give them sand and they will drink it"

 

citizens can read what they want, if fed with state propaganda, they will drink sand like water.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...