Jump to content

Plagiarism on SG Carmart???


Elfenstar
 Share

What do you think?  

9 members have voted

  1. 1. Was it plagiarised???

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      4


Recommended Posts

Came across this article and was wondering about what double way shock effect absorbers are and Googled it (still haven't found anything about how it works or what it is).

 

One of the results that came up had text that was VERY similar to what was written.

 

SG Carmart Article: http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/writeup.php?AID=120 (see 1, 2, & 3)

The Google result: http://www.shibumiparts.com/ingles/amortiguadores.html

Edited by Elfenstar
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Came across this article and was wondering about what double way shock effect absorbers are and Googled it (still haven't found anything about how it works or what it is).

 

One of the results that came up had text that was VERY similar to what was written.

 

SG Carmart Article: http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/writeup.php?AID=120 (see 1, 2, & 3)

The Google result: http://www.shibumiparts.com/ingles/amortiguadores.html

 

 

content looks 80% similar..

 

definitely will fail a essay write up in TurnItIn..

 

then again, such definitions of how mechanisms work is more or less the same.. cos the physics involved cannot be change much..

Link to post
Share on other sites

content looks 80% similar..

 

definitely will fail a essay write up in TurnItIn..

 

then again, such definitions of how mechanisms work is more or less the same.. cos the physics involved cannot be change much..

 

Thats what I thought too about the similarities.

 

Well he should at least give credit where it is due rather than make it seem like his own, and also at least use the right info!!!

1, isnt right as only some dampers work that way.

For 2, whats this "noiseless response" thingy linked to it??? Do standard shock absorbers even make a lot of noise? Anyway pressurised nitrogen is used to reduce foaming of the oil, and not for some noise related purpose.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

But it's only a small section anyway. And it's not completely wholesale. Got some paraphrasing also.

 

Paraphrasing without credit is still plagiarism isn't it? Esp since its this blatant in this case.

Edited by Elfenstar
Link to post
Share on other sites

defination of plagiarism is copy and paste word for word

 

what sgcarmart did is paraphrasing. which is changing the words, structure etc that it does not look like the original.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Came across this article and was wondering about what double way shock effect absorbers are and Googled it (still haven't found anything about how it works or what it is).

 

One of the results that came up had text that was VERY similar to what was written.

 

SG Carmart Article: http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/writeup.php?AID=120 (see 1, 2, & 3)

The Google result: http://www.shibumiparts.com/ingles/amortiguadores.html

How it works and all same concept what..

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

defination of plagiarism is copy and paste word for word

 

what sgcarmart did is paraphrasing. which is changing the words, structure etc that it does not look like the original.

 

Well plagiarism is defined as passing off another's ideas as your own, not copying word for word (feel free to check any dictionary). Why do you think wikipedia has references at the bottom?

Edited by Elfenstar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Well plagiarism is defined as passing off another's ideas as your own, not copying word for word (feel free to check any dictionary). Why do you think wikipedia has references at the bottom?

 

It's kinda hard to determine whether the information in that article are "facts" or "ideas" actually.

 

But you do raise a good point.

Edited by BenCee
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kinda hard to determine whether the information in that article are "facts" or "ideas" actually.

 

But you do raise a good point.

 

Well in this case some of the facts are not right which makes them ideas which in turn. Besides IIRC, any fact that is original and/or not common knowledge is legally and academically counted as an idea thus credit needs to be given. Furthermore in this case the phrases and words used even with paraphrasing was very similar.

 

Anyway I do know you write for them too. At least crediting a source may be something you may want to consider to cover your bum. Better to be safe than sorry. In your instance, I noticed you like to write a lot of opinion pieces. You may want to choose a source that either agrees or disagrees with you, cite and credit their statement and explain why you agree or disagree with them. It will make your writings even stronger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Well in this case some of the facts are not right which makes them ideas which in turn. Besides IIRC, any fact that is original and/or not common knowledge is legally and academically counted as an idea thus credit needs to be given. Furthermore in this case the phrases and words used even with paraphrasing was very similar.

 

Anyway I do know you write for them too. At least crediting a source may be something you may want to consider to cover your bum. Better to be safe than sorry. In your instance, I noticed you like to write a lot of opinion pieces. You may want to choose a source that either agrees or disagrees with you, cite and credit their statement and explain why you agree or disagree with them. It will make your writings even stronger.

 

Thanks for your opinion and feedback. You're right, I do write for them (so thanks for noticing. [:)] ), and I've actually informed the people in charge of that article, and changes will be made.

 

From what I understand, that author of that particular piece is a freelancer, and I've been told that his work will be more closely scrutinised in future.

 

Thanks once again for raising this up.

 

Cheers

[:)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your opinion and feedback. You're right, I do write for them (so thanks for noticing. [:)] ), and I've actually informed the people in charge of that article, and changes will be made.

 

From what I understand, that author of that particular piece is a freelancer, and I've been told that his work will be more closely scrutinised in future.

 

Thanks once again for raising this up.

 

Cheers

[:)]

 

No worries. It was a little worrying that a commercial entity didn't credit its information source, and to be honest if I didn't google something i didn't know about and notice the similarities in how it was written (esp some of the weird errors which would not be an error if linked to a specific damper), it may have gone totally unnoticed.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...