Jump to content

Taxi again...


Ender
 Share

Recommended Posts

I didn't anticipate his move, as he was slowing down and for a moment was stationary in his right turn only lane . Only when I about to cross the stop line, he decides to step on the gas and go on straight against a red light that was on for a long time.

 

My fault for not slowing down to prepare for his abnormal manoeuvre.

If TS always meet such drivers, TS is likely the cause of the problem: confusing others. TS can attend some refresher driving lessons.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but can't help but ask.....

How can TS be mostly at fault??????????

What happen to the rule book that you guys here always advocate without fail?????

Taxi driver cross the traffic light on his right turn lights come out, he should turn otherwise he is beating the red light then......

 

Regardless Taxi driver made a mistake or not, he should just keep going and make a U-turn on the next opportunity.

It puzzles me when TS becomes at fault in this situation. Please enlighten.............

 

Just stating what the law is. The reason that technically two laws are being broken if there was an accident. In this scenario turning vehicles must give way to straight going vehicles regardless of light colour, so that law would have been broken. The other law broken was for beating the light, which is why if there was an accident, some allocation of blame would have also gone to the taxi driver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like both vehicles were beating the red light, just that one was turning, the other went straight.

TS wanted to turn right without signalling with offside trafficator [thumbsdown] . The taxi driver was frightened by TS, to change to straight instead, due to TS not signalling with offside trafficator [shakehead] . The taxi driver was pracrtising defensive driving to avoid being rammed by TS on the nearside of taxi [thumbsup] .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just stating what the law is. The reason that technically two laws are being broken if there was an accident. In this scenario turning vehicles must give way to straight going vehicles regardless of light colour, so that law would have been broken. The other law broken was for beating the light, which is why if there was an accident, some allocation of blame would have also gone to the taxi driver.

+ both drivers failed to signal with respective trafficators before turning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

alway taxi want rush time chiong to get customer and every time in express-way got accident also got taxi involve inside [shakehead] [shakehead] [shakehead]

 

Really ar? But on Fri morning after ramp to SG immigration at woodlands, saw 1 pte car kissed the butt of another pte car leh. Wat does that mean har?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mixed feelings towards them lah - they are suffering in terms of rising costs and long working hours but these conditions turn some of them into dangerous, devil-may-care drivers.

 

It is always the kayu drivers behind the wheels of watever car they are driving, not a particular type of car.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...