Jump to content

Forget First World Hype


Toothiewabbit
 Share

Recommended Posts

Forget First World hype

Former civil servant Ngiam Tong Dow tells Susan Long why Singapore should just aim to be a solid "second-upper" city.

The Straits Times, 12 Jan 2013

 

 

RETIRED senior civil servant Ngiam Tong Dow's worry for Singapore today is that it has begun to believe its own propaganda that it has arrived as a First World city.

 

"It's a complete delusion on our part to think that we can become a First World city such as New York, London and Tokyo," says the 75-year-old adjunct professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. "As a 'little red dot', we suffer from inherent limitations of space, size of population, depth of talent pools and political influence."

 

While being a First World city may be beyond it, he says Singapore should focus on being a solid "second-upper" city. "It's more pragmatic to position ourselves as the best in class of the world's second-tier international cities, such as Zurich, Boston, Sydney and Tel Aviv. These are all cities with populations of five million to six million of well-educated people and they compete on knowledge."

 

Increasingly, he says, the differentiator for successful cities is "not cheap labour but competent labour". Singapore's Achilles heel, as he sees it, is that over the past decade, it chose to pump in cheap foreign labour instead of drilling down to the unglamorous task of improving productivity, skilling up its workers for higher- level jobs and improving standards of schools.

 

"Productivity is low because we went for imported cheap labour and now we're stuck in a time warp. We can compete only in industries of low technology. This time around, I hope the Cabinet has the political courage to push this through," says the former permanent secretary in the Prime Minister's Office and the Finance, Trade and Industry, National Development and Communications ministries before he retired from the elite Administrative Service in 1999.

 

He recently stepped down from the boards of Singapore Press Holdings and United Overseas Bank.

 

Although Singapore's official unemployment rate is at a low of 2 per cent, the pro-chancellor of the National University of Singapore, who helps give out about 9,000 degree scrolls a year, notes there lurks "disguised unemployment and underemployment".

 

"How many and what kind of quality jobs can we provide for school leavers a year?" he asks. "In the 1950s, they became hawkers. Today, we have hundreds of young graduates becoming property agents or relationship managers selling esoteric products."

 

He fears also that Singapore has lost the knack of asking the right questions. "We often start with the answers we want and ask the questions to support it."

 

For example, in discussions on the "right" size of Singapore's population, he charges that the authorities mainly debated how to create a higher-density city with more high-rise flats and condominiums to cater to more people. "That's only a physical constraint, not an economic constraint."

 

He says the right parameters to frame the question instead are: "Can we sustain the economic livelihoods of five or six million people? Surely, the size of the population is as much as you can sustain the economy of Singapore.

 

"Asking the right questions today is the most important factor for Singapore's future sustainability. If you ask the wrong questions, you're in trouble."

 

What weighs heavily on his mind these days is what kind of Singapore his three grandchildren, aged 15 to 21, will live in years from now. "I want them to live in a Singapore where they can hold their heads high, be of value to the rest of the world to earn their living and not have to kowtow to others," declares the first- generation Singaporean born to a court interpreter and washerwoman from Hainan.

 

He lost his father at age nine to tuberculosis, attended Serangoon English School and St Andrew's Secondary, then applied for a job as a postal clerk. But a medical check-up showed he had contracted early-stage tuberculosis and was unfit for work. As a default, he continued studying, and won an open bursary to the University of Malaya, where he scored a first in economics.

 

In 1959, he started life as an Economic Development Board officer, earning a reputation for being both a "thinker and a doer". At 35, he became Singapore's youngest permanent secretary in 1972. After his retirement, he was appointed chairman of the Singapore Economic Development Board, Development Bank of Singapore, Central Provident Fund, and Housing Board.

 

Since then, he has refused to fade into the sunset and has spoken up - often critically - about his worries for the future of Singapore and the People's Action Party. He concedes: "People think I'm a fool... I'm no longer in a position to change things but ideas can change societies. It is my duty as a Singaporean to leave behind ideas for the younger generation."

 

He admits it hurts when ex-colleagues say: "Tong Dow, why are you still stirring the mud?" Or when they accuse him of "playing the old gramophone record".

 

"The politest has been: 'Why didn't you say all these when you were still in the civil service?'"

 

For the record, he says he dissented on policies back then, such as the certificate of entitlement balloting system, which he believes has irrevocably raised Singapore's key production costs.

 

These days, he speaks at universities and think-tanks about six times a year and is busy compiling his fourth book. He also golfs and spends time with his retired schoolteacher wife.

 

The best way is to view Singapore, he suggests, as a work in progress. One of his dearly departed friends, Mr Roop Vaswani, a Sindhi merchant, always told him: "It's best to be climbing up a mountain to success and never to arrive. The moment you reach the summit, the only way is down."

 

He sums up: "Likewise, in Singapore, we should not believe that we're already First World. Or that we have arrived at the pinnacle."

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

frankly lah....he can say all he want...the fact still remain that he is a product from the PAP regime....educate under their system...work under their system....retired under their system ......all his life...he did nothing when he was enjoying all these........now is all cheap talk..

Edited by LoverofCar
Link to post
Share on other sites

first world or not, in the end, its the food and shelter that each citizens worked hard for to provide their families, and do you think those struggling to make ends meet care about being FIRST WORLD???

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The talk on Sgp being a first world state is all part of the marketing strategy. I can see where the Sgp "sales reps" is coming from. They want to attract investors. If you want to attract the best investors of course Sgp must put on its best and not its "second best".

 

Due to our lack of resources, land and limited talent pool, attracting foreign investment is more or less the key to keep Sgp floating for the next many decades. If you want good money flowing in you have got to attract the best and not the second or third best.

 

The way I see it the first world hype is not for us coz we are here. We know. The hype is to let overseas ppl get to know about Sgp.

Edited by Watwheels
Link to post
Share on other sites

....he can say all he want...the fact still remain that he is a product from the PAP regime....educate under their system...work under their system....retired under their system ......all his life...he did nothing when he was enjoying all these........now is all cheap talk..

i beg to differ.

 

what he said , i feel, is a high quality, honest comment/ analysis.

 

when he climbed to such a high level, he was one of the top performing civil servants who did alot to build this nation.

 

不以人废言

"reject his comments because of who he is"

 

anyway, i think he is way better than most ministers in the previous cabinet, and the current one, with vision and sincerity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Infrastructure, we are 1st world or close, expcet our public toilets. People social behavior & ehnics, nope, sorry. Just look at our drivers, shown of considerate & coutesy, or rather the lack of it.

 

Its not 3rd world, but our people in general is not fisrt world for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First world or not is not self proclaimed.....but our MIW always say we are first world....not sure which part here is first world...

 

The salary paid out to ministers is first world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A country/city is only as good as its people, those who run it and those who live in it. IMO we aren't even in the so-called second tier he said of Sydney, Zurich and etc.

 

We can have all the best and most fantastic systems in the world (which we do not), but if our politicians continue to be selfish and money-hungry f*ckers, and our people subsequently follow suit due to circumstances, we will simply be on the road to ruin.

 

The moment this country and our leaders wake up and realise that $$$ is not everything, will be the day towards salvation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i beg to differ.

 

what he said , i feel, is a high quality, honest comment/ analysis.

 

when he climbed to such a high level, he was one of the top performing civil servants who did alot to build this nation.

 

不以人废言

"reject his comments because of who he is"

 

anyway, i think he is way better than most ministers in the previous cabinet, and the current one, with vision and sincerity.

I'm not saying what he said is wrong...just that when he is in the system ...he should do more to correct the wrong...top.performance by following the regime system? Still is only talk now..

Link to post
Share on other sites

First world or not is not self proclaimed.....but our MIW always say we are first world....not sure which part here is first world...

 

MIW's salary is not only first world, is out of this world.. :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think when he still was in the system he felt that we were heading in generally the right direction. Notice he mentioned "the last decade" and how he feels we've gone in the wrong direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as much as a fox would want to twist it, or ordered its dogs to reality distort it. the Matrix is taking some knocks.

 

A 30 second

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...