MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 There are things in the market that are proven, and there are junk snake oil masquerading as miracle oils Consumers have to decide whether to spend money on these junk and need info to make an informed decision , not base on shield seller saying his shield is godly, heck even the best condom can poke hole. Furthermore there is a risk of engine damage or unwanted deposits left behind from some cleaning solutions even those like motor vac and liqui moly. I don't see anything wrong in users asking for more info, but as they said seems u want to hide something First, kindly allow me to clarify. Yes, there is nothing wrong in users asking for more info, but please do it in a polite manner. Agree? I already mentioned if you want MSDS, email us. And suddenly i get a response that we "jolly well" release the MSDS and got accused that we are hiding something. Really don't get it. But thank you for your comments and feedback, we will look into updating more information on our website. We have been in the market for over 12 years, treating marine bunker fuels, industrial fuels, etc. and still no reports of engine damages. We will definitely look into putting these results and reports online our maznitro.com website. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furrynadz 5th Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 (edited) sg fuel quality is very good compare to msia or thailand hk one is really good, u dont smell the sulphur at all, can literally lick the exhaust pipe daily driving is more than sufficient, the petrol has enough additive package, but better to rotate petrol brand occassionally to let B brand clean out A brand deposits First, kindly allow me to clarify. Yes, there is nothing wrong in users asking for more info, but please do it in a polite manner. Agree? I already mentioned if you want MSDS, email us. And suddenly i get a response that we "jolly well" release the MSDS and got accused that we are hiding something. Really don't get it. But thank you for your comments and feedback, we will look into updating more information on our website. We have been in the market for over 12 years, treating marine bunker fuels, industrial fuels, etc. and still no reports of engine damages. We will definitely look into putting these results and reports online our maznitro.com website. as a "commercial entity" and worse...a "sponsor" folks are more sceptical, its like those rubbish JML is selling on TV if u guys want to be successful, have to step up the game and differentiate yourself by being more informative and transparent and let the result speak for themselves instead of one sided stories industrial usage and car engine is two diff thing, dont lump the two together car engines are 1 zillion time more sophisticated than crude industrial engines Edited July 18, 2014 by Furrynadz 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 sg fuel quality is very good compare to msia or thailand hk one is really good, u dont smell the sulphur at all, can literally lick the exhaust pipe daily driving is more than sufficient, the petrol has enough additive package, but better to rotate petrol brand occassionally to let B brand clean out A brand deposits as a "commercial entity" and worse...a "sponsor" folks are more sceptical, its like those rubbish JML is selling on TV if u guys want to be successful, have to step up the game and differentiate yourself by being more informative and transparent and let the result speak for themselves instead of one sided stories industrial usage and car engine is two diff thing, dont lump the two together car engines are 1 zillion time more sophisticated than crude industrial engines Yes,definitely. Again, thank you all for your valuable feedback. We will be updating our website ASAP. Sorry for missing out that we have also been treating both gasoline and diesel car engines, not just marine bunker and industrial fuels. So far the reviews for Singapore are here: http://list.qoo10.sg/GMKT.INC/Goods/Goods.aspx?goodscode=415153451 Our local website is only three months old, so lots of improvements have to be done. Greatly appreciate all your feedback! Just wanted to find out more about the paraffins junk information and will work on these valuable comments from you guys. Thank you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoob Supercharged July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 First, kindly allow me to clarify. Yes, there is nothing wrong in users asking for more info, but please do it in a polite manner. Agree? I already mentioned if you want MSDS, email us. And suddenly i get a response that we "jolly well" release the MSDS and got accused that we are hiding something. Really don't get it. But thank you for your comments and feedback, we will look into updating more information on our website. We have been in the market for over 12 years, treating marine bunker fuels, industrial fuels, etc. and still no reports of engine damages. We will definitely look into putting these results and reports online our maznitro.com website. Your company website is more e-commerce based than information based. For results, there must be a basis for the results e.g. how was it done. How many rounds of testing did the drivers go through etc Consumers need informative data to make a smart decision. And to be honest, even techron is not claiming to have such impressive fuel efficiency. It is good to have confidence in the product you sell but not to show arrogance. For No harm analysis studies, there must be a basis for such claims e.g. lab result and how it was done, how many times they did the tests, on what engine etc. And seriously, Techron MSDS is easily available if you just google compared to Maz Nitro and most of the 'snake oils'. There is no need to read posts in-between the lines, the basic is still about making the right choice with information. I'm one of your pre-product launch testers. I can say it does help in fuel consumption for my vehicle but the improvement I had is about 3% to 5% on EssoMobil 98 (in the mist of testing Gen2 of your product). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoob Supercharged July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 Yes,definitely. Again, thank you all for your valuable feedback. We will be updating our website ASAP. Sorry for missing out that we have also been treating both gasoline and diesel car engines, not just marine bunker and industrial fuels. So far the reviews for Singapore are here: http://list.qoo10.sg/GMKT.INC/Goods/Goods.aspx?goodscode=415153451 Our local website is only three months old, so lots of improvements have to be done. Greatly appreciate all your feedback! Just wanted to find out more about the paraffins junk information and will work on these valuable comments from you guys. Thank you! If I scrutinized the reviews, most of it is talking about delivery speed rather than the product effectiveness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 If I scrutinized the reviews, most of it is talking about delivery speed rather than the product effectiveness. Ya, totally agree. We do have a few users who commented about the fuel saving %. Been trying to get them to try out first before dropping us a review on Qoo10.sg. Will get my courier guys to remind them again verbally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furrynadz 5th Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 Most if not all of additives just give placebo effect for maybe one day or immediate That's why all the product sellers ask u feedback fast, so they can screenshot ur feedback as good feedback. We need to look at number of return cases over a prolong period. One example I can give is klear karbon that has a well laid out website that clearly explains what the product is, what it does, how it works, but does not promise any thing except a cleaner engine, and leave u to evaluate the results after the treatment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 Your company website is more e-commerce based than information based. For results, there must be a basis for the results e.g. how was it done. How many rounds of testing did the drivers go through etc Consumers need informative data to make a smart decision. And to be honest, even techron is not claiming to have such impressive fuel efficiency. It is good to have confidence in the product you sell but not to show arrogance. For No harm analysis studies, there must be a basis for such claims e.g. lab result and how it was done, how many times they did the tests, on what engine etc. And seriously, Techron MSDS is easily available if you just google compared to Maz Nitro and most of the 'snake oils'. There is no need to read posts in-between the lines, the basic is still about making the right choice with information. I'm one of your pre-product launch testers. I can say it does help in fuel consumption for my vehicle but the improvement I had is about 3% to 5% on EssoMobil 98 (in the mist of testing Gen2 of your product). We have a corporate website www.mazoil.com and there are more details in there. We are in the midst of getting a full revamp of the corporate website. And for our e-commerce website, we did not want to confuse users with our container vessels testing, etc. Thought it will be of no interest to consumers as they are more interested in automobiles. There are some sensitive reports that involve the government and military and thus we require NDA signatory before we can release the information. Will look into releasing other lab reports on our website. Which bottle are you at now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 Here you go: MSDS and relevant analysis reports on MAZ Nitro http://www.maznitro.com/shop/en/content/14-maznitro-analysis-reports Will be uploading more reports soon. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picanto 3rd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 i think stick with the tried and proven brand:CALTEX 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoob Supercharged July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 We have a corporate website www.mazoil.com and there are more details in there. We are in the midst of getting a full revamp of the corporate website. And for our e-commerce website, we did not want to confuse users with our container vessels testing, etc. Thought it will be of no interest to consumers as they are more interested in automobiles. There are some sensitive reports that involve the government and military and thus we require NDA signatory before we can release the information. Will look into releasing other lab reports on our website. Which bottle are you at now? I'm on 50L without MazNitro to make sure the result is fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazNitro 1st Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 (edited) I'm on 50L without MazNitro to make sure the result is fair. Hope you are doing the baseline comparison before you add in MAZ Nitro and not after. MAZ Nitro will have a coating in the engine once you have treated it. i think stick with the tried and proven brand:CALTEX Do take a closer look at our MSDS and Caltex MSDS. You will see the similarities. Coz 3 of our components are supplied by them. That component is a pure detergency agent, thus we have dual benefits of combustion and detergency. Edited July 18, 2014 by MazNitro Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pms 3rd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 nitromethane for combustion and stoddard solvent for detergency. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sg2303 2nd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 (edited) I didn't know there is a discussion here as well. I tried the Maz Nitro. Prior to using MazNitro, f/c reads 10.5km/l - 10.7km/l (readings from my onboard computer)After 1st bottle: f/c reads 10.3km/l After 2nd bottle: f/c reads 10.2km/l Today I just used the 3rd bottle after refueling. Power wise, didn't feel much difference. Maybe my butt dyno is not sensitive enough. Seems like 10$ down the drain. I have a bottle of Techron in my boot. Can't wait to try it after this tank. Edited July 18, 2014 by Sg2303 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tohto Hypersonic July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 I didn't know there is a discussion here as well. I tried the Maz Nitro. Prior to using MazNitro, f/c reads 10.5km/l - 10.7km/l (readings from my onboard computer) After 1st bottle: f/c reads 10.3km/l After 2nd bottle: f/c reads 10.2km/l Today I just used the 3rd bottle after refueling. Power wise, didn't feel much difference. Maybe my butt dyno is not sensitive enough. Seems like 10$ down the drain. I have a bottle of Techron in my boot. Can't wait to try it after this tank. Keep us post after you used the Techron... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pms 3rd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 (edited) make sure you pour the techron or any other cleaning additives in a near empty tank first then fill up with petrol. Then measure the mileage on the next fill up because this is a fuel system cleaner and it needs the current fill up to clean. Edited July 18, 2014 by Pms Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kengheng450 2nd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 I didn't know there is a discussion here as well. I tried the Maz Nitro. Prior to using MazNitro, f/c reads 10.5km/l - 10.7km/l (readings from my onboard computer) After 1st bottle: f/c reads 10.3km/l After 2nd bottle: f/c reads 10.2km/l Today I just used the 3rd bottle after refueling. Power wise, didn't feel much difference. Maybe my butt dyno is not sensitive enough. Seems like 10$ down the drain. I have a bottle of Techron in my boot. Can't wait to try it after this tank. I also having milelage reduced after using Maz Nitro for 2 tanks.Usually i get 550km for 1 tank,now only manage to get 500km. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pms 3rd Gear July 18, 2014 Share July 18, 2014 did you test the mileage on the second fill up without maznitro? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Very bad fuel consumption 🥴
Very bad fuel consumption 🥴
Exclusive Offer: Be 1st to try new Techron® D Concentrate!
Exclusive Offer: Be 1st to try new Techron® D Concentrate!
Techron vs V Power
Techron vs V Power
Caltex Techron/PowerClean fuel additive
Caltex Techron/PowerClean fuel additive
Amsoil PI Performance Improver Concentrate
Amsoil PI Performance Improver Concentrate
Review: Duragloss 901 (car wash concentrate) & Duragloss 755 (Nu-Glass)
Review: Duragloss 901 (car wash concentrate) & Duragloss 755 (Nu-Glass)
Concerntrate Techron.
Concerntrate Techron.