Jump to content

Mx-5


Chenqien
 Share

Recommended Posts

Neutral Newbie

hmm.. u might be right la.. but evo/sti and mx-5 appeal to diff grp of pple...

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

definately evo/sti and mx-5 appeal to a very different group of people. singaporeans are very practical, thus there are so many pre f/l wrx on the road but not anymore for the 2.5L wrx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

bro is a diff ball game...

u are comparing apple to orange which doesn't make sense..

 

u dun compare a SLK with a Jaguar ya?

 

some pple swear by soft top/2 seats , some sedans, some MPVs, some SUV, some turbo-ed, which is ur EVOs and Rexs. True that evos and rexs are performance racing cars.. boosting huge horsies, but to some, they will think that its afterall a sedan..of coz they are definately not as comfy as most cars, as their shocks/ride are harder

 

some pple just love the softtop and topless feel.. its like driving a "SPORTS" car.. yea?

 

well tats to my perspection, [;)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
but with 110k....most would simply either add in another 10k for a brand new Evo, or probably get a STI and still got left over. other than the roadster feeling from the mx5, lesser on road as well. the evos and sti are far superior in power, handling and value for $$$ compared to mx5. both evo and sti have 4 ddoors, bigger boot space.

 

I must have heard something similar applied to many cars a million times over.

 

For a marginal X dollar more, you get A more power, B more handling, C more speed.

 

Let's repeat, a lightweight FR roadster is not about 'superior power, handling and value'. Its about lifestyle and fun.

 

The argument CANNOT go on indefinitely about power handling and value. It's completely different from what roadster-lovers are looking for.

 

[shakehead]

Link to post
Share on other sites

bro, did u understood my conversation with chenqien fully? basically wat u said is wat me and him actually discussing about. read up our conversation. [:)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

[shakehead] seems tat u guys dont read, we already said the 2 different types of car appeal to different groups of people and singaporeans are practical. mx-5 dont seem practical to most.

 

sigh, issit typical singaporeans or wat?...read and understand before replying can? [:|]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

"hmm.. new mx5 looks nicer than the old version i feel

great handling too, seat on my friend's ride...

contrastly, the MRS is a mid engine .. very high mantainace, handling wise, stock to stock , the MX5 is better."

 

I thought mid engine are suppose to be better in the handling arena? since weight are distributed evenly. kindly elaborate on your reasoning. [:)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

IC - Well, you may be right - there are definitely far fewer 3rd Gen MX5 compared to older series of MX5.

 

Perhaps a possible reason could be when the MX5 first came out many years ago -it was the first real "econo" 2 seater topless roadster - hence popular - no competition

 

Fast forward 10 years to the present day and 2 generations of MX5 - far more competition now like the Toyota MRS or Opel Tigra and the vastly popular but still girly - Peugoet 206 Cabrio - possible reason? I think so [thumbsup]

 

I think SLKs and 3,6 series and Z4 cabriolets are cars for a different market whom can afford second or third cars just for fun - so cannot count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

aiyah.. dun argue la.. come here is talk cxxk and exchange ideas 1 and make friends and enjoy urself.. everyone speak nice nice can liaoz loh.. eh btw issac.. goind by ur nick.. u juz ord-ed and if so frm which camp ah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

agreed.. but mx-5 sorta epitomised the way a roadster could be as compared to the other opel and peugoet.. pardon me for saying this but "econo" continental roadsters nowadays dun look sexy enough leh...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

cos i know of another issac frm my camp whcih ord same day as me and also 85 1.. so i was thinking you might be him.. [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

swee loh u all.. do 1 yr 10mnths.. i enhanced also must do 2yrs 2 mnths.. knn [furious] hhaa

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...