Jump to content

All about PS3


Dj_spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

casino was once tot to be social ill... [:p] and its true that the copyright owner should sue.... so i was always thinking.... can they sue us if we watch the streaming because we end user will not know that copyrights has not been paid.....

 

 

nice one [rolleyes]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

casino was once tot to be social ill... [:p] and its true that the copyright owner should sue.... so i was always thinking.... can they sue us if we watch the streaming because we end user will not know that copyrights has not been paid.....

 

 

[laugh] i remembered someone said as long as he is here,no casino will be built..

 

no wonder our roti prata so famous one..can sell to become millionaire [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

casino was once tot to be social ill... [:p] and its true that the copyright owner should sue.... so i was always thinking.... can they sue us if we watch the streaming because we end user will not know that copyrights has not been paid.....

 

very grey area. copyright by default must involve some "copying".

 

Usually, theres no "copying" involved in watching. you watch, but didnt make a copy, so by right its ok.

 

problem is, what about your browser cache? this one im not so sure.....

 

whatever the case, clear your cache [;)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

contentiously, its about control the user has. if its an idiot-proof box that allows you to simply watch pirated material, then the infringement likelihood is higher.

 

if a user has a lot of control, like a PC, and the user has made a conscious choice to watch pirated material, the PC seller has less control and less liability.

 

simply, if i sell you a pirated CD, theres nothing more you can do but watch it (maybe can use as a coaster, but i doubt the court will buy it), and so I am surely in the wrong. but if i sell a blank cd, and i didnt tell you to burn pirated material on it, its not my fault if you did! :-)

 

 

in short, FS has to bring in a box with more option other than watching pirated material :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

contentiously, its about control the user has. if its an idiot-proof box that allows you to simply watch pirated material, then the infringement likelihood is higher.

 

if a user has a lot of control, like a PC, and the user has made a conscious choice to watch pirated material, the PC seller has less control and less liability.

 

simply, if i sell you a pirated CD, theres nothing more you can do but watch it (maybe can use as a coaster, but i doubt the court will buy it), and so I am surely in the wrong. but if i sell a blank cd, and i didnt tell you to burn pirated material on it, its not my fault if you did! :-)

 

but streaming sties has no mention on copyright.... ignorance is bliss? [:p]

Link to post
Share on other sites

[laugh] i remembered someone said as long as he is here,no casino will be built..

 

no wonder our roti prata so famous one..can sell to become millionaire [laugh]

 

i thot this was "retracted" during a recent documented interview [cool]

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually all depends on a country policy

 

sportbetting is used to be illegal too, see our legalise bookmaker make it legal

 

oversea are all private bookmaker, ladbrokes etc

 

last time they catch pple whom bet with them

 

but in their country,it's legal to do so.

 

but if i stream to their site, i think it's ok since its their policy etc

 

u see,thats why alot anti g forumers are not banned even u can allow here...coz it's not our local laws to step into other's area to banned them,unless whole ISP in Singapore wana block these sites..

 

Since if by local law is not legal, but the access are not block,are we mean we allow by ISP?

 

another contradicting issue? If they allow,means ok?if violate rules, illegal, should stop like China blocking some sites to their countries man.

 

Tio bo?

 

just like why a company got entertainment card to entertain but vendor treat pple eat is "black" one?

 

i ask 20 pple,20 dont know how answer me

 

 

it will become LAN instead of Internet [laugh][laugh]

Edited by Freestylers09
Link to post
Share on other sites

very grey area. copyright by default must involve some "copying".

 

Usually, theres no "copying" involved in watching. you watch, but didnt make a copy, so by right its ok.

 

problem is, what about your browser cache? this one im not so sure.....

 

whatever the case, clear your cache [;)]

 

 

set clear cache to daily?

Link to post
Share on other sites

but streaming sties has no mention on copyright.... ignorance is bliss? [:p]

 

practically everything is copyrighted the moment it is produced. no need to pay money to have it "copyrighted".

 

even my post is copyright material, good news is i wont be suing anyone who "copies".

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm..words i not sure

 

but for logos and signature, if u Registered or Trademark then u can sue.forget which is pple cant sue u and u can sue pple,another is pple cannot sue u but u cant sue him etc etc

 

Patent is for service or invention.

Edited by Freestylers09
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, can only sue for infringement within sg. whatever happens o'seas is their problem. but the gambling happened in singapore. i.e. you placed the bet here, so thats within SG shores. online gaming license only sg pools have, so that one is legal, the rest of the websites, too bad. same for videos, you own a pirated "copy" here, you get in trouble.

 

as for:

 

Since if by local law is not legal, but the access are not block,are we mean we allow by ISP?

 

Most cars in singapore can move in excess of 180kph. doesnt mean its allowed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so guys when collect bluetooth?

 

thursday?

 

Thursday I will be in your area as usual for my soccer.... 8 sharp outside pitch 6 can?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...