Rogersk8ter 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Hi all. I just renewed my insurance policy with ntuc a few days ago. A friend later told he renewed his with AXA and the rates were good. So I checked with axa and they quoted me their comprehensive which is even cheaper than ntuc 3rd party! Was thinking can i ternminate and switch over to axa. Any penalties? thanks. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferraricalifornia 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 you might want to call up NTUC to verify??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mzrmazda3 6th Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Bro, if i'm not wrong, there will be a penalty Think 50-100 bucks ... Best is you call up NTUC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 actually i dont even know why ppl wanna sign up with NTUC... usually more expensive... less then dont know how many months left cannot refund... ANY 2-door car is a sports car... bloody lawyer firm acting for them ask me to admit to 30-40% when it wasnt my fault then tell me must go court all... maybe some bros here can explain why NTUC is good? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endure201 Clutched September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Try call this number: 6788 6616 NTUC motor insurance, just call them to enquire on my rebate.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 maybe some bros here can explain why NTUC is good? Probably same reason people think P@P is good. Gahmen-backed means must be good, what. Poor, naive fools. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Probably same reason people think P@P is good. Gahmen-backed means must be good, what. Poor, naive fools. nowadays wrong word out of the mouth can get into hotsoup... better shhhhhhh.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 (edited) nowadays wrong word out of the mouth can get into hotsoup... better shhhhhhh.... Brother, why fear bullies? That'll only lead them to bully us more. *They* are our (civil) servants, yet they act like arrogant masters, and we should be happy about it?! No way, man. :angry: But I don't want this to go OT, so back to insurance please. Edited September 9, 2010 by Turboflat4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laworder17 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 actually i dont even know why ppl wanna sign up with NTUC... usually more expensive... less then dont know how many months left cannot refund... ANY 2-door car is a sports car... bloody lawyer firm acting for them ask me to admit to 30-40% when it wasnt my fault then tell me must go court all... maybe some bros here can explain why NTUC is good? Admit 30-40% of Fault??? Can explain abit on this??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Admit 30-40% of Fault??? Can explain abit on this??? long story... i even went to the insurance company at UOB plaza twice... to explain in detail what happen... chain collison... i wast the 5th car and i DID NOT HIT THE 4th car.... i stopped in time... but the 6th car smashed my ass and i smashed the 4th car.... so i was asked to admit 30% percent liability... i said 20% liability i ok... cause wont affect NCD... but ask me admit 30% so i said no... then in the end tell me i must attend court a few times... must this must that... so i was persuaded to just sign 30% and save the trouble.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Brother, why fear bullies? That'll only lead them to bully us more. *They* are our (civil) servants, yet they act like arrogant masters, and we should be happy about it?! No way, man. :angry: But I don't want this to go OT, so back to insurance please. let's leave politics to coffeeshop chit chats and not over the net.. cheers bro have a wonderful day! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferraricalifornia 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 long story... i even went to the insurance company at UOB plaza twice... to explain in detail what happen... chain collison... i wast the 5th car and i DID NOT HIT THE 4th car.... i stopped in time... but the 6th car smashed my ass and i smashed the 4th car.... so i was asked to admit 30% percent liability... i said 20% liability i ok... cause wont affect NCD... but ask me admit 30% so i said no... then in the end tell me i must attend court a few times... must this must that... so i was persuaded to just sign 30% and save the trouble.... ain't that blackmailing??? force you to sign the 30%, or else must attend court hearing??? liddat can sue them back right??? [laugh] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 ain't that blackmailing??? force you to sign the 30%, or else must attend court hearing??? liddat can sue them back right??? [laugh] no lah what blackmailing? the lawyer only state facts mah... she said the judge looking at my damage will likely say i did smash into the 4th car... i dont know the statment of the 4th car... but their claim to me was crazy high... it was a crv... so i think it was the judge who asked me to accept 30% liability... if i dont i need to go court lah... i accept how many % liability also i no need pay a cent its my insurance pay other party... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder7890 Neutral Newbie September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 All the while throughout the years, they are not just expensive vrey expensive and what make you think that they are cheap. They are sucks and have not insured under them since 10 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferraricalifornia 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 no lah what blackmailing? the lawyer only state facts mah... she said the judge looking at my damage will likely say i did smash into the 4th car... i dont know the statment of the 4th car... but their claim to me was crazy high... it was a crv... so i think it was the judge who asked me to accept 30% liability... if i dont i need to go court lah... i accept how many % liability also i no need pay a cent its my insurance pay other party... still sound like blackmail to me leah.... you don't do this, expect this treatment.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken4555 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 All the while throughout the years, they are not just expensive vrey expensive and what make you think that they are cheap. They are sucks and have not insured under them since 10 years ago. who is they? and since when TS say NTUC is cheap? or who u referring to in the 1st place? AXA? you remind me of a friend i knew... she always goes... "hey you know that one... help me buy ok?" wtf... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pippo20 Neutral Newbie September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 long story... i even went to the insurance company at UOB plaza twice... to explain in detail what happen... chain collison... i wast the 5th car and i DID NOT HIT THE 4th car.... i stopped in time... but the 6th car smashed my ass and i smashed the 4th car.... so i was asked to admit 30% percent liability... i said 20% liability i ok... cause wont affect NCD... but ask me admit 30% so i said no... then in the end tell me i must attend court a few times... must this must that... so i was persuaded to just sign 30% and save the trouble.... Your explaination will make the judge laff, the fact that the 6th car can propel u to hit the 4th car in front means you did not keep a safe distance, 30% is very fair.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferraricalifornia 1st Gear September 9, 2010 Share September 9, 2010 Your explaination will make the judge laff, the fact that the 6th car can propel u to hit the 4th car in front means you did not keep a safe distance, 30% is very fair.. dude.... the impact itself is good enough to propel you to the front, even with the brakes on.... :angry: ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Drink Driving Is An Act Of Irresponsibility!
Drink Driving Is An Act Of Irresponsibility!
Car insurance renewal
Car insurance renewal
Advise on car insurance
Advise on car insurance
Sideswipe Accident Insurance Claim
Sideswipe Accident Insurance Claim
Singtel insurance
Singtel insurance
Car insurance for 2nd car by 1 owner
Car insurance for 2nd car by 1 owner
NTUC Insurance : Fearless
NTUC Insurance : Fearless
MAS to allow online nomination of insurance beneficiaries
MAS to allow online nomination of insurance beneficiaries