Jump to content

Which performance part helps the most?


Carmaniac
 Share

Which performance part helps the most?  

70 members have voted

  1. 1.

    • NOS
      9
    • turbocharger
      30
    • supercharger
      4
    • ECU upgrade
      13
    • intercooler
      5
    • suspension upgrade
      9


Recommended Posts

For NA car, i still prefer doing up Exhaust system, changing the air-intake system and adding a piggyback and tune it first den should be quite ok for a NA car oready..

 

To T.C n S.C nt a cheap things to play lei..

 

the steps u mentioned is a basic steps of NA mods...

the most u can get is 10-15 horses for all the mods combined....

but high cams can give more gains...

but still need to do other mods to give its fullest gains....

Link to post
Share on other sites

supercharged cannot compare to NA mah...

ofcos supercharged is better lah...

 

Sorry, didn't make myself clear. I mean it is better to supercharge a NA then to Turbocharge it.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see....

but i think not really also...

dun forget the supercharged is using the engine power....

in a long run also will hurt the engine...

 

1. So better to stay away with SC and TC and enjoy our NA.

 

2. If only there is a less rigid LTA approval process on SC and TC.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

no lah, the SC in itself will not harm the engine. all the harm comes from the extra power in the movement of the pistons if the parts arent capable of taking those forces (e.g. if you overboost a factory FI car).

 

Same problem with nitrous. In fact nitrous is better for the engine than petrol as not only does it have more energy than petrol, it also cools the intake charge. (as per normal i drift off topic [:p]

 

the only prob with having and SC rather than TC is that as the SC is mechanically driven, it robs some power from the engine which otherwise would go to the wheels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno if it is better, but TC is more efficent.

 

See my reply to turbonetics on SC.

 

the real question is do you want more power at low revs or more top end. the SC is better for low revs as it spins quick enough for boost from start but runs out of puff up to and a TC takes some time to create boost (lag) but does not run out of puff at top end if you get the right size.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno if it is better, but TC is more efficent.

 

See my reply to turbonetics on SC.

 

the real question is do you want more power at low revs or more top end. the SC is better for low revs as it spins quick enough for boost from start but runs out of puff up to and a TC takes some time to create boost (lag) but does not run out of puff at top end if you get the right size.

 

Is there a balance between the two? Recently, market introduced some electric turbo stuffs, Is there such a thing?

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

elect turbos don't work. they cant move enough air to create any difference. There was one exception, but it costs too much. Not to mention that you might as well go for a SC as the loss of power efficiency is still there as there is an increased load on the alternator which still robs the engine of some power.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Very subjective.

 

Number 1 it depends what you want. Performance or handling or both

 

Number 2 you cannot do the turbo and forget everything else. Upgrading the turbo requires a numerous amount of supporting mod. Without 1 or the other none will work.

 

Most people think by upsizing a bigger turbo it'll mean more power. Well its not as simple as upsizing a turbo or adding a turbo into a NA. Upsizing a TCed car requires a variety of supporting mods. TBE, intakes, ECU, Injectors, Fuel pump, better RON ratings if possible, bigger intercooler ranging from TMIC to FMIC to VMIC.

 

Bottomline, everything is important. [rolleyes]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

I already got performance boost button in my ride. It has a label A/C written on it. Switch it off and I get a 20% increase in acceleration/ pick-up and a 2km/l improvement in FC [laugh]

 

:

:

:

 

Bad joke..... [furious][rifle]

Link to post
Share on other sites

elect turbos don't work. they cant move enough air to create any difference. There was one exception, but it costs too much. Not to mention that you might as well go for a SC as the loss of power efficiency is still there as there is an increased load on the alternator which still robs the engine of some power.

 

What is this exception? So in conclusion, TC is more engine friendly than SC? NOS is illegal so will not try here. NOS is prone to explosion, perhaps the reason of its ban.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a post ages ago about an elect turbo that did work. it would set you back ant USD$2k just for the actual item.

 

TC and SC are both equally engine friendly, just that SC is less power friendly as it uses the engines power to drive it while the TC uses waste gases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wah a bit hard... for power increase per $, TC then SC then nitrous.

 

Intercoolers do not increase power although they allow you to make more power safely.

 

How do you compare suspension when it does something totally different to the rest of the mods??

 

Intercoolers do not increase power although they allow you to make more power safely.

 

[laugh] I tot it is to lower the temp. of the air b4 it enters the air intake manifold?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...