Watches 2

[Throttle2]

base on my on board computer, FC is 5.7km per liter.

not too bad. 100% city driving.

 

 

[Thaiyotakamli]

heavy foot = 9.11km/l

 

light foot = 9.97km/l

 

for the current model...maybe 9.91km/l

Thats better than E250 anytime ha!

[Thaiyotakamli]

base on my on board computer, FC is 5.7km per liter.

not too bad. 100% city driving.

Then should be okay ba based on the performance, worth it. U pump v power?

Sorry ask lot cos i thinking of a cayenne this year

Edited January 13, 2013 by Thaiyotakamli

[Yeshe]

Just curious hahaha i know he dont care fc cos he wipe 2-3 table enough to pay for his whole year petrol

 

Last time owned a rx300 1st gen and petrol is 4.9km/l....

 

wu yah boh? toyota engines tend to be fuel efficient leh, 4.9km/l sounds like the FC of a supercar, unless u got a lemon?

[Yeshe]

base on my on board computer, FC is 5.7km per liter.

not too bad. 100% city driving.

 

my fren last time achieve FC of 5km/l on his F430, damn happy [laugh]

[Yeshe]

Then should be okay ba based on the performance, worth it. U pump v power?

Sorry ask lot cos i thinking of a cayenne this year

 

sorry but the cayenne really looks fugly. i rather u go for range rover

[Thaiyotakamli]

sorry but the cayenne really looks fugly. i rather u go for range rover

I got 3 option actually: cayenne, range rover sport or the new touareg hybrid.. not surw though which onw but will be buying 2nd hand coa bo lui

[Thaiyotakamli]

wu yah boh? toyota engines tend to be fuel efficient leh, 4.9km/l sounds like the FC of a supercar, unless u got a lemon?

Its lecus and not toyota hor! Ask my friend who drive harrier also 5 point something. U know right that lexus rx 1st gen?

Then my current rx hybrid can get 10 easily

[Theoldjaffa]

base on my on board computer, FC is 5.7km per liter.

not too bad. 100% city driving.

actual will be worse.

 

my obc shows 8km/l, but in actual when I divide distance travelled by litres pumped, I get 7.2 to 7.5.

[Theoldjaffa]

Thats better than E250 anytime ha!

I was just playing a fool.. 911, 997, 991.. u get the drift

[Theoldjaffa]

wu yah boh? toyota engines tend to be fuel efficient leh, 4.9km/l sounds like the FC of a supercar, unless u got a lemon?

or is it 4.9l/100km??

[Thaiyotakamli]

I was just playing a fool.. 911, 997, 991.. u get the drift

Lol i dont know where u get the unrealistic figure from but hahaha nice number!

[Theoldjaffa]

Then should be okay ba based on the performance, worth it. U pump v power?

Sorry ask lot cos i thinking of a cayenne this year

I tot ur family want to save money that's why the A8 as sold?

 

want to save $$ then but now want to chut cayenne.. its gonna cost more to run compared to A8.. unless its not your family car but your own ah?

 

 

[Throttle2]

Then should be okay ba based on the performance, worth it. U pump v power?

Sorry ask lot cos i thinking of a cayenne this year

 

i pump Caltex 98. Shell is out of the way.

[Throttle2]

actual will be worse.

 

my obc shows 8km/l, but in actual when I divide distance travelled by litres pumped, I get 7.2 to 7.5.

 

 

the onboard computer is very accurate.

i calculate what i pump against the mileage i travel and it's exactly the same.

 

[Thaiyotakamli]

or is it 4.9l/100km??

No suv toyota can do that

[Thaiyotakamli]

I tot ur family want to save money that's why the A8 as sold?

 

want to save $$ then but now want to chut cayenne.. its gonna cost more to run compared to A8.. unless its not your family car but your own ah?

Sell off current car, then plus abit audi money then can already. Anyway now property too hot to touch alread

My own money maybe enough to buy a b&b car hahaha

[Theoldjaffa]

the onboard computer is very accurate.

i calculate what i pump against the mileage i travel and it's exactly the same.

then its good! cuz my previous crossroad's obc also off by about 1km/l so I arrived at the conclusion that the obc is not calibrated properly.