Jump to content

Corruption Case at CPIB PArt 2


RadX
 Share

Recommended Posts

Neutral Newbie

the fact that it is splashed all over the papers, tv news etc, already shows there is some real interest in the news. you don't like doesn't mean it is waste of bandwidth. and at least it is more readable than those threads complaining another driver of bad driving behavior and expecting that driver to be able to read it in MCF. [laugh]

Think cs should start reading MCF for some relief, or reflections [:)]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean such a real life soft porn AV material is attractive enuf? [:)]

If I didn't have to work for a living,

 

I also would be lining up at the court

 

house hoping to be one of the 30 people

 

in the public gallery!

 

:D

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Based on what we know at the moment, really have to also question how the case even got this far.

 

There seems to be a very distinct lack of even an indication of wrongdoing (other than putting his chip where it shouldn't have been)

 

On the other hand, I would now be very curious to know

a) how many (if any) other clients CS treated like a chupa chup

b) what happens if she also bribe others (MNC will jump about this)

c) Where is CS's hubby - and are they getting divorced

d) If what she said in court is true, can BG be charged with rape

e) Does someone really have a vendetta against BG..

 

 

And just in case you were wondering, I am totally a gossiping auntie - must be because there are too many girls in my house

 

bro, if we had a comment of the day award, ill nominate you just for a) alone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this is really case close with no corruption case been process and no other charge.

 

i pity the family of both CNB and CS..

 

poor family, have to live under the light of public because this 2 person commit adultery. [shakehead]

 

Just to bad. He could have hurt her feelings and cheated her. And she who married with a child, trying to float on 2 boats. Later fell in love with the ex-CNB chief. So the moral of the story, is never start the fire. Have a good family, just put wholeheartedly to keep the family-fire burning, instead of setting another fire which in-turn potentially burn him/her life down to dirt and upside-down. This is exactly, happening to these 2. [bigcry]

 

Even if the lady hubby, could have standby her, I believe there will still be cracks. We are human. Not machine. Nothing is free and easy way in this world. When time is up, just have to face and pay a great deal at the end of day.

Edited by HP_Lee
Link to post
Share on other sites

A female IT salesperson came to see me yesterday about my office giving swicthing over to her company for supply of IT stuff....she not that pretty but quite dolled up and well dressed....we exhcanged namecards (which contained our mobile phone numbers) and i couldn't help wondering if she will sms me asking me if i DIY....

 

Know the consequences. [shakehead]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really must add to this

 

Just yesterday while on the MRT home I saw this boy wearing a sleeveless T-shirt with the words "I LOVE SP"

there are some small fonts for the SP which read "St Pat's"

 

Of course I love SP. I'm from Singapore(SP), schooled in St Patrick(SP) and Singapore Ploy(SP). [laugh]

Edited by HP_Lee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course I love SP. I'm from Singapore(SP), schooled in St Patrick(SP) and Singapore Ploy(SP). [laugh]

 

ooi, i also St pat old boy leh :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess getting a boy or girl depends alot on genes also. My mum's side relatives all keep getting girls and for my dad's side all getting boys. Totally no girls. Now my turn also all boys.

 

yep quite likely.i see more cases of all boys or all girls family

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

If I didn't have to work for a living,

 

I also would be lining up at the court

 

house hoping to be one of the 30 people

 

in the public gallery!

 

:D

If the court case proceeds in camera, I want to be the lens :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

SINGAPORE: Three officers of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) will take the stand when the sex-for-contracts trial of ex-Central Narcotics Bureau chief Ng Boon Gay resumes on Wednesday.

 

The new witnesses had recorded a number of statements from the prosecution's key witness, Ms Cecilia Sue Siew Nang.

 

They were not on the prosecution's initial list of witnesses, but were summoned after the first part of the trial ended on October 2.

 

Ng is accused of obtaining oral sex from Ms Sue on four occasions in 2011, in exchange for helping to further the business interests of Hitachi Data Systems and Oracle Singapore. Those were the two IT firms Ms Sue had worked for.

 

The trial is set to go on for another 12 days.

 

During the first-leg of the trial, from September 25 to October 2, one question was at the forefront -- Was Ms Cecilia Sue having an affair with Ng Boon Gay?

 

Ms Sue, the key prosecution witness, took the stand unexpectedly on day two of the trial and gave a graphic account of how Ng had forced her to perform oral sex on him on four occasions.

 

However, what the 36-year-old said in court was not always consistent with what she told officers of the CPIB.

 

Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng, who represented Ng, produced telephone records from March 2010 to December 2011 to bolster his case that the two were in a sexual relationship.

 

The grilling proved too much for Ms Sue, who broke down several times.

 

On the fourth day of the trial, she admitted that she had lied to the CPIB.

 

The mother-of-one said it was the first time she was being investigated, and was afraid and confused. Describing herself as a "normal sales representative", she said she did not want to offend Ng, who she said was "well-connected".

 

The defence then applied to impeach Ms Sue's credibility as a witness, therefore the district judge will decide at the close of the trial which parts of her evidence are to be admitted.

 

Ms Sue's flip-flopping triggered another unexpected move by the prosecution - it questioned her as a hostile witness, saying she had a "consensual relationship with the accused from 2009 to September or October 2010."

 

However, Ms Sue disagreed with the prosecution's stand.

 

Speaking of the unusual move, Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Ken Hwee said it "was not taken lightly." He stressed that Ms Sue's statements to CPIB were given voluntarily and not under duress.

 

To prove this, DPP Tan called three CPIB officers who had recorded a number of statements from Ms Sue to testify.

 

So far, both prosecution and defence agree that Ng did not influence the committee that awards IT contracts, nor instruct his subordinates to favour Hitachi or Oracle Singapore.

 

The prosecution's case is that Ng pressured Ms Sue into giving him oral sex, with the full knowledge that she was pursuing business opportunities at that time.

 

The defence's position is that they were having an affair. The defence also challenges the charges - asking what exactly Ng did to further the business interests of the two firms, given that the prosecution agreed that Ng has no influence on the committee nor instructed his subordinates to show favour.

 

-CNA/ac

Edited by Tayspiderx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

camp here for free show [:p]

Nothing much to feast yours eyes on liao....cos CS is not expected or required to attend court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing much to feast yours eyes on liao....cos CS is not expected or required to attend court!

 

Chey... then nothing to see anymore -_-

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...