A_nesta84 Clutched November 5, 2009 Share November 5, 2009 last weekend i supppose ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon5 5th Gear November 5, 2009 Share November 5, 2009 act i hv been driving the CS3 for coming 4 yrs...it is a reliable and proven car...so if u r looking for something cheap and sporty, do not miss this... one very unsung quality of this car is its excellent FC....it is not uncommon for the manual rides to do 14-15km/l. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
So_nice 6th Gear November 5, 2009 Share November 5, 2009 the auto version is using the mivec engine? sure bo... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
So_nice 6th Gear November 5, 2009 Share November 5, 2009 Hi, i have seen the car itself. All parts can factory fitted from Japan. But the pricing that C&C is selling now is 58988 with full accessories. the engine is the same as the old GLX. but the Auto one is with Mivec engine with 4 speed step-tronics. i just called c&c and they informed both models are running on the old 1.6l sohc engine. no mivec or watsoever. tats doing the MR tag no justice at all. sigh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelccm Neutral Newbie November 5, 2009 Share November 5, 2009 act i hv been driving the CS3 for coming 4 yrs...it is a reliable and proven car...so if u r looking for something cheap and sporty, do not miss this... one very unsung quality of this car is its excellent FC....it is not uncommon for the manual rides to do 14-15km/l. I thought manual usually have a better FC than auto version? (Not counting those with heavy right foot) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ady75 Neutral Newbie November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 hmm..basically,its the same kindda engine they're using. For auto,the only difrence are the steptronic gearbox and speedo. oh ya..and this so call MR version comes wif rear brake disc.. not drums anymore.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocus Turbocharged November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 is step-tronics. better than CVT? Actually steptronic is still CVT, just that it has a manual shifter. Something like the Colt Ver R. (I'm assuming it's the INVECS III steptronic) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watwheels Supersonic November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 Actually steptronic is still CVT, just that it has a manual shifter. Something like the Colt Ver R. (I'm assuming it's the INVECS III steptronic) I think for this car it's 4-speed torque converter with manual override, or some call it tiptronic. INVECS is for CVT, which is steel belt & pulley. Very different between the two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sash1401 4th Gear November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 wah... den i guess there's not much difference in the glx version and the current MR version liao le... den y r they introducing dis version? guys, worth buying?? i had heard that the glx version on pple commenting that the fc is gd but there r some who commented that the fc is lousy... dun really noe who to trust as i've considered tat model b4... wat do u guys think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
So_nice 6th Gear November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 hearing it from the horses mouth will be more accurate rather then those who commented super good/poor fc. i'm not sure abt the manual version but the previous auto (CVT?) is really really sluggish. i have driven it for a day and basically its nothing more then a city cruiser. i maybe wrong cuz i'm driving a manual car myself or i dun really understand how CVT gear box works. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
So_nice 6th Gear November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 at 56,988, i think there are better cars to buy at tat price. if u dun mind 2nd hand u can even buy a 1.8l ralliart lancer turbo and still come home wif some loose change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon5 5th Gear November 6, 2009 Share November 6, 2009 Actually steptronic is still CVT, just that it has a manual shifter. Something like the Colt Ver R. (I'm assuming it's the INVECS III steptronic) 4 speed gearbox and CVT are not the same.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furrynadz 5th Gear November 7, 2009 Share November 7, 2009 http://s620.photobucket.com/albums/tt282/dt3305/ Pictures and information courtesy of forumers in LMC... I'm merely copying & pasting :) locally fitted bodykit tons of them at the old citroen service centre at level 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woonyang Clutched November 7, 2009 Share November 7, 2009 it's a con job to clear their GLXes at a higher price Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virage 1st Gear November 9, 2009 Share November 9, 2009 (edited) sorry repeat post, deleted one of them Edited November 9, 2009 by Virage Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virage 1st Gear November 9, 2009 Share November 9, 2009 Reminds me of the 1.8 Ralliart Turbo which Mitsubishi used to sell here before the launch of the EX. I really hope the MR badge is not abused here. thats not quite correct... the previous Lancer Ralliart Turbo 1.8 has a slightly bigger engine, light turbo, upgraded suspension with lower height, ricardo seats, HID, strut bar its no Evo, but very much better and different to the standard lancer at the time... please get your facts right - in what way is the Ralliart name abused for the Lancer Ralliart Turbo 1.8? it did not claim to be Evo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habil Neutral Newbie November 10, 2009 Share November 10, 2009 yup that's the right one dude.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfisti168 1st Gear November 13, 2009 Share November 13, 2009 (edited) thats not quite correct... the previous Lancer Ralliart Turbo (LRT) 1.8 has a slightly bigger engine, light turbo, upgraded suspension with lower height, ricardo seats, HID, strut bar its no Evo, but very much better and different to the standard lancer at the time... please get your facts right - in what way is the Ralliart name abused for the Lancer Ralliart Turbo 1.8? it did not claim to be Evo Nah. What I mean is that the legacy of the MR NOW seems to be diluted due to this new lancer MR. Maybe my phrasing sucks, but what I mean is that the LRT 1.8 deserves its 'Ralliart' moniker, with the latter not being abused in this case. and IMO I find that there should be a 'MR' badge put there too, in the LRT, at that time. Edited November 13, 2009 by Alfisti168 ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Old Hong Kong TVB drama series (70s,80s - 90s) anyone into?
Old Hong Kong TVB drama series (70s,80s - 90s) anyone into?
Anyone watches MMA?
Anyone watches MMA?
Green fingers anyone?
Green fingers anyone?
Anyone try Cathay Pacific before?
Anyone try Cathay Pacific before?
New Zealand - anyone?
New Zealand - anyone?
Anyone into HK cantonese song (80s~end 90)
Anyone into HK cantonese song (80s~end 90)
Roti Prata lover? Anyone?
Roti Prata lover? Anyone?
How much maintenance for Nissan Latio, Toyota Vios & Lancer
How much maintenance for Nissan Latio, Toyota Vios & Lancer