Jump to content

China 歼-20 first flight new photos 


Wishcumstrue
 Share

Recommended Posts

This plane is huge comparing to the F35.

 

Both different animals.

 

F35 for multi-national, shared components, VSTOL-capable low cost attack stealth.

 

J20 is larger & heavier. Super-cruise capable and longer-range with greater stealth multirole.

More like F22/T50.

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

J-20 test flight Nov 12.

 

HD resolution with original sounds taken a local aviation fan.

 

Notable scenes:

 

1) Test pilot boarding.

2) Variable nozzle changes

3) Engines spool up tone (this one gave me the goose-bumps!)

4) Pre-flight controls checks and very fast responses - DFC in action.

5) Line-up taxi for a/b take-off - (camera man at good spot)

6) Fly-by over the airfield - kinda like giving a free airshow demo with kids amongst the on-lookers.

7) Wind turbulence can be heard when it flew over the landing path.

8) Drag-chute landing.

 

 

The speed those control surfaces move is amazingly fast.. Hardware-wise, it seems up to standard.. now it's the software implementation..

 

Canard equipped planes are impossible to fly without computer help in minor adjustment of the canard angles.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the F-35 JSF are never meant to be an air superiority fighter.. the US has the F/A-22 for that.. F-35 is meant to replace the F-16 as a affordable multirole air-to-air/air-to-ground fighter..

 

Take a look at the amount(and variety) of arnaments the F-16 can carry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the F-35 JSF are never meant to be an air superiority fighter.. the US has the F/A-22 for that.. F-35 is meant to replace the F-16 as a affordable multirole air-to-air/air-to-ground fighter..

 

Take a look at the amount(and variety) of arnaments the F-16 can carry.

 

Its actually meant to be a multi-role fighter designed to be capable against multiple air, naval or ground threats. Its BVR capability safely outguns even the J20 with the Northrop Grumman MMA AESA.

 

Exactly its meant to be a cheaper F-22 or F-16 with stealth. It is also a replacement for the F/A-18 eventually apart from the B variant being utilised on MEU LHDs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its BVR capability safely outguns even the J20 with the Northrop Grumman MMA AESA.

 

We don't know how good is the BVR capabilities of the Chinese planes yet.. but for sure, US technologies are tried and tested in various wars, starting from 1st Gulf war to Kosovo to 2nd Gulf War...

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know how good is the BVR capabilities of the Chinese planes yet.. but for sure, US technologies are tried and tested in various wars, starting from 1st Gulf war to Kosovo to 2nd Gulf War...

 

Various defence analysts have actually speculated from what they have seen of the J-20 or similar and that China has designed a fighter to match the F-22's capability only in waves. 1:1 it is no hope but hopefully with a 10:1 ratio of loss or more that China can afford, attrition will eventually wear out the US.

 

However, we also forget that the US trains the best fighter pilots in the world so machine means only 1/3 of the game.

 

Then again we have RAND Corporation with its Pacific Vision Exercise scenario which damned the US.

Edited by Cerano
Link to post
Share on other sites

it mentions the usual high off boresight capability of the F-35 (meaning you dont have to maintain the lock by centering on the target in the middle of your HUD.

 

Off bore shots systems are widely used today, including Including RSAF's F16D and F15SG (Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)

Source: http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_we...c08_weapon.html

 

It was the Russian who pioneered the HMS system in 1980s starting from Mig29/Su27.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off bore shots systems are widely used today, including Including RSAF's F16D and F15SG (Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)

Source: http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_we...c08_weapon.html

 

It was the Russian who pioneered the HMS system in 1980s starting from Mig29/Su27.

 

Yes thats why i emphasised the word usual, the unique feature that I mentioned was the ability by the DAS to fire away from the target and let the missiles turn backwards towards the enemy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The speed those control surfaces move is amazingly fast.. Hardware-wise, it seems up to standard.. now it's the software implementation..

Canard equipped planes are impossible to fly without computer help in minor adjustment of the canard angles.

 

Yes, the controls has to lighting fast and precise, else no way this unstable bird will even fly.

In fact, the flight control IS already both a s/w and h/w implementation.

What they need is to explore the envelopes & refine the flight charactistics.

 

So J-20 is going for test, test test test and MORE test!

 

And as in any flight testing, the danger is always there.

Classic one is in this 1992 video when a YF22 crashed when a flight control software error failed to prevent a pilot-induced oscillation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats why i emphasised the word usual, the unique feature that I mentioned was the ability by the DAS to fire away from the target and let the missiles turn backwards towards the enemy

 

Cannot be unique leh...I thought such off-bore shot is already available in Russian/Israel/Chinese AA systems?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its actually meant to be a multi-role fighter designed to be capable against multiple air, naval or ground threats. Its BVR capability safely outguns even the J20 with the Northrop Grumman MMA AESA.

 

Exactly its meant to be a cheaper F-22 or F-16 with stealth. It is also a replacement for the F/A-18 eventually apart from the B variant being utilised on MEU LHDs

 

Some how the development of Lightning II for multi-role purposes reminds me of what they have done more than 50 years ago with Phantom II.

 

Nostalgic...

 

Just for old warbird lovers here is the McDonnell Douglas F4 Phantom II:

 

F-4_main.jpg

 

and the cute spook that represents this magnificent jet:

 

spook.gif

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Official maiden flight at ChengDu with presence of VIP.

 

Photo taken by armature Chinese aviation enthusista on 11 Jan 2011 outside parameter fence.

Auspicious date: 8th day of 12 month on Lunar calender

 

The "propaganda" slogans accompanying each photo are laughable! I think even for their younger generation, this kind of thing has gone out of style long ago...

 

I think their technology can only get better and better with time. Those buying made-in-china products will have noticed the improvement in quality over recent few years... and nobody can beat their pricing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some how the development of Lightning II for multi-role purposes reminds me of what they have done more than 50 years ago with Phantom II.

 

Nostalgic...

 

Just for old warbird lovers here is the McDonnell Douglas F4 Phantom II:

 

[thumbsup] Classic!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "propaganda" slogans accompanying each photo are laughable! I think even for their younger generation, this kind of thing has gone out of style long ago...

 

I think their technology can only get better and better with time. Those buying made-in-china products will have noticed the improvement in quality over recent few years... and nobody can beat their pricing.

 

LOL.. our military ads and posters are not much better in terms of propaganda postings.. [laugh] [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

In today's context agile dog fighters like F16s may not go very far from now on.

 

Newer technologies like UAV may be the new toy they want to fully develop.

 

Or new configurations for BVR capabilities (hence bigger internal bay to store these munitions) for new manned aircraft will be the future trend.

 

Side track & OT a bit.

 

Why F15SG was selected still puzzles me till this day....

We only buy American

 

and we buy 30 year old American.

 

Like A4 Skyhawk, E2C etc

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We only buy American

 

and we buy 30 year old American.

 

Like A4 Skyhawk, E2C etc

 

:D

 

We cannot buy too new too advance equipment ? Else neighbours will question our intention ? Very political hor :mellow:

 

Unlike cars, I have money I buy supercars, no need to care if neighbour questioning my intention to how lian, to over take his etc [laugh]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...