Another DBSS case

[Darryn]

Where can you say a contract is OUTLAW and predatory when the farker walked in with both his eyes open and was made known to the T & C...

 

Somemore say ppl here got to learn and understand ENGLAND better...

 

Tell you what..

 

You want prove and fight your case...in Court ( not the one that sells furniture and electronics)

 

Go ahead...

 

But my humble guess is...

 

the farker who went to sign the contract in this case..

 

Will end up the BIGGER loser plus legal cost to pay..

 

Go and do research kind sir - clauses in a contract that are considered unfair, predatory or demonstrating an imbalance of power CAN be set aside in some jurisdictions.....

 

From Singapore contract guidelines we have:

 

Unconscionable Bargains http://www.singaporelaw.sg/content/Contrac....html#section11 -

 

8.11.10 Apart from instances involving duress or undue influence, equity may also relieve parties from

[Darryn]

It is really immaterial to what report he is refering to...

 

confusing or not..

 

The farker who go and sign to buy such property with known T & C ..

 

can't tell the World that now..

 

he is in shxt becos of this and that he can't fulfill.

 

 

 

===============================================================

I feel that I always dish out advice(s) to 'younger' folks..note the word younger...becos some folks can be well into a age where he can buy a Porcheee...

 

But it is always in VAIN..

 

The material part for the reporting argument is:

 

The job of a correspondent is not just to record what someone says and then repeat it. Rather to dig into the truth, find out what are the circumstances, and provide a judicious, well argued, informative report on what happened.

 

Unfortunately, Siingapore's media are all too often just "reporters" rather than "correspondents"

 

[Jman888]

agree that it is imbalance/unfair clause in the agreement.

[Icedbs]

John said he had asked the HDB and the developer to help him search for a new fianc

[Joseph22]

agree that it is imbalance/unfair clause in the agreement.

 

yeah agree. because i cannot exploited it