Jump to content

BYE BYE COE


Vinil
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

The following suggestions were made to replace the current COE system appreciate your kind advice.

 

create ERP gantries on the entrance of all major roads and pricing will be as follows:-

 

1. 0630am-0730am $ $5.00 per day

2. 0730am-0930am $ 20.00 per day

2. 0930am-1030am $ 15.00 per day

3.1030am-1130am $ 10.00 per day

4.1130am-1830pm $ 5.00 per day

5.1830pm-0630am $ 3.00 per day

 

No more COE and HDB should issue only one car park per house hold and the car must be in the name of the house owner or one of the family members in the family nucleus.

 

ARF for cars below engine power 100HP 100% Cars between 100-150HP 125% Cars between 150-200HP 150% cars between 200-250 200% 250 and above 300%

 

appreciate your valuable comments .

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason behind this is LTA is inviting public discussion on the matter on July first week , so it will be real helpful if we can get the majority views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

brilliant ! next you write a 1500 hundred words essay and submit it as school holiday assignment. i will collect when school re-open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here we go again [rolleyes][rolleyes]

hmmmmm............ remind me of my army daze songs...

 

'Here we go again

same old sh*t again

running down this avenue

2 more years & we'll be through'

 

-_-

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

No more COE and HDB should issue only one car park per house hold and the car must be in the name of the house owner or one of the family members in the family nucleus.

 

this is silly, that means one household only one car?

 

what if the occupation for one of the occupants is a taxi driver? does that means cannot buy car already for other occupants?

 

besides not every household have cars, so does that means carparks now alot of empty lots due to one car per household regulation?

 

what happens to those household now owning more then 1 car (including taxi), where they gonna park their "extra" cars?

 

this will not work.

Edited by Newdrive
Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant ! next you write a 1500 hundred words essay and submit it as school holiday assignment. i will collect when school re-open.

 

 

nowadays student submit holiday assignment DURING the holiday, not waiting till school open. My friend was helping the children to rush out the assignment yesterday before the deadline at 3pm <_< <_<

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hai...I don't know if we should call ourselves daft, innocent or just silly...

 

Can afford means can afford. Cannot afford means cannot afford.

 

Anyway $20 is too cheap lah. Unless it is $20 in addition to current gantries...or $20 per gantry.

 

By then innocent singaporeans will say bring back the coe...coz they calculate $20 for morning go to work, $10 for evening go home...then still same price as coe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

School holiday ending soon. last burst of energy before all goes in.

 

Pls lar, can afford, then buy, cannot afford, buy 2nd hand, if lagi cannot afford take BMW lor.

 

Pls enough of such bo liao thread. TS should get a yellow card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is silly, that means one household only one car?

 

what if the occupation for one of the occupants is a taxi driver? does that means cannot buy car already for other occupants?

 

besides not every household have cars, so does that means carparks now alot of empty lots due to one car per household regulation?

 

what happens to those household now owning more then 1 car (including taxi), where they gonna park their "extra" cars?

 

this will not work.

 

Taxis are not considered as private transport as such Taxi companies need to arrange the parking .

we expect more Singaporeans will able to buy cars if we follow this system so we dont want to have a situation where there is not enough parking lots.

 

LTA will refund prorated COE and ARF as per the new system to the current owners.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well have 2 types of COE base on the milage travelled by the owners.... [sly]

 

1. Those who needs a car for his job (so submit his daily milage to verify)

 

2. Those who drives only from point A to point B and thereafer parked whole day at the car park and back home.

 

 

Just like taxi nowadays, have to clock 250km per day... [sweatdrop]

 

and those who from point A to point B type, LTA allows 2 trips (home to office & office to home free), extra trips, owner had to pay $5/- per trip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

why so many ideas just to cover up the root cause..solve the root cause..you solve everything..be it housing, public transport and cars..

 

i say..reduce the population back to 2.5M..send all those FT and PR back to their countries..we can do it with 2.5M in the 80s and do very well..why we need so many ppl here to feed the GDP and make those white become rich while us suffer from their happiness!!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hai...I don't know if we should call ourselves daft, innocent or just silly...

 

Can afford means can afford. Cannot afford means cannot afford.

 

Anyway $20 is too cheap lah. Unless it is $20 in addition to current gantries...or $20 per gantry.

 

By then innocent singaporeans will say bring back the coe...coz they calculate $20 for morning go to work, $10 for evening go home...then still same price as coe.

 

yes if we drive every day at peak hour it is will be almost same as current COE .

the intention is to discourage people from driving during peak hours and drive only if necessarry.

 

As there is no more COE Taxi's granty entry fee will be paid by the Taxi company so taking a Taxi will be more viable .

Link to post
Share on other sites

why so many ideas just to cover up the root cause..solve the root cause..you solve everything..be it housing, public transport and cars..

 

i say..reduce the population back to 2.5M..send all those FT and PR back to their countries..we can do it with 2.5M in the 80s and do very well..why we need so many ppl here to feed the GDP and make those white become rich while us suffer from their happiness!!!!

 

wah!!! best comment liao!!! [thumbsup][thumbsup][thumbsup]

Link to post
Share on other sites

At first when I read TS's post, I thot LTA came up with some brilliant ideas. Later then I know that it is school holiday essay topic. :D

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...