Check13 3rd Gear March 4, 2016 Share March 4, 2016 Promo @ $159,999. Some OCBC promo for OCBC customers interest at 2.48% hahaha.if It's this price, what u waiting for? the cost is already 159k so they sell at this price make what $? rental, utilities, wages etc ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashbang Turbocharged March 4, 2016 Share March 4, 2016 if It's this price, what u waiting for? the cost is already 159k so they sell at this price make what $? rental, utilities, wages etc Basic car cost for XE 2.0d is 102k. Add in Cat B COE of 47k, total is 149k. They still make 10k from a sale, but that's a crazy low margin for a premium brand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Materick 1st Gear March 4, 2016 Share March 4, 2016 How do you bargain below listed price of 159999? Jaguar trade in value really bad.around 4 to 6k lower than bmw and Mercedes that's actually because bmw and merc raise their list price higher, then give you "overtrade" nonsense. check out the following link from one motoring and you'll see that jaguars are actually higher cost price cars...while bmw and merc are just sucking you with higher margins and profits..... http://www.onemotoring.com.sg/publish/onemotoring/en/lta_information_guidelines/buy_a_new_vehicle/car_cost.html 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLZT 6th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 Jaguar just don't sell well in Singapore compared to bmw and merc. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Check13 3rd Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 (edited) Basic car cost for XE 2.0d is 102k. Add in Cat B COE of 47k, total is 149k. They still make 10k from a sale, but that's a crazy low margin for a premium brand.ah ok. I thought he was referring to the petrol version which has a higher basic cost. Edited March 5, 2016 by Check13 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie26 Hypersonic March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 XE petrol and diesel, basic cost or sale price is about 10k difference XE petrol was launched at 204 999k and after 5k discount 199 999k Currently listed at 184 999k and after 5k its 179 999k They usually don't do overtrade and their sale price usually not far (5k) from listed unlike BMW and Merc with the "overtrade" which often makes buyers think that they have a durian-drop deal So surprised to hear 159 999k with "overtrade" for diesel right now with coe at 46k Resale Jag has a limited pool of buyers compared to BMW and Merc bec replacement parts and servicing can burn the pocket if unlucky to get a lemon Basic car cost for XE 2.0d is 102k. Add in Cat B COE of 47k, total is 149k. They still make 10k from a sale, but that's a crazy low margin for a premium brand.ah ok. I thought he was referring to the petrol version which has a higher basic cost. 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayoflight 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 (edited) Wearnes have to play catchup with XE since this is Jag'是first midsize luxury sedan.. Mercs, bmw, audi already have a mature mkt for this segment Edited March 5, 2016 by Rayoflight 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
7hm Turbocharged March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 XE had an impressive look to me when I first heard of it. Now, it doesn't seem as chio as I thought at the time. And the ongoing criticism of interior space seems like a letdown. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audi2016 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 XE had an impressive look to me when I first heard of it. Now, it doesn't seem as chio as I thought at the time. And the ongoing criticism of interior space seems like a letdown. This XE is slightly bigger & longer than its rivals like the current C-class or the new A4 but it doesn't translate into bigger interior space like legroom or shoulder width. Maybe all in the insulation lah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
east41st 3rd Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 XE had an impressive look to me when I first heard of it. Now, it doesn't seem as chio as I thought at the time. And the ongoing criticism of interior space seems like a letdown. The criticism on the interior space is overblown. I sat in both the XE and IS200t, they are pretty much the same. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayoflight 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 (edited) The criticism on the interior space is overblown. I sat in both the XE and IS200t, they are pretty much the same. More leather in interior? Is the dashboard leather wrapped? Edited March 5, 2016 by Rayoflight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audi2016 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 The criticism on the interior space is overblown. I sat in both the XE and IS200t, they are pretty much the same. Lol you are talking about 2 cars that are similarly cramped inside, of cuz the same. I suggest taking a look at C-class, the current latest gen one. The knee room and foot space is class leading. Jag XE is quite far behind. Width of door opening also slightly behind for the Jag. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audi2016 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 More leather in interior? Is the dashboard leather wrapped? Dunno about the Lexus but Jag XE is leather wrapped, dashboard as well as door panels or most of it, in black leather. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturtles 6th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 This XE is slightly bigger & longer than its rivals like the current C-class or the new A4 but it doesn't translate into bigger interior space like legroom or shoulder width. Maybe all in the insulation lah I though the C-class had a tiny rear legroom compared to say the 2015 Audi A4 and the F30-3 Series. The Jaguar XE seemed smaller than the C.. Kind of reminds me of the E46 3-series 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audi2016 5th Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 I though the C-class had a tiny rear legroom compared to say the 2015 Audi A4 and the F30-3 Series. The Jaguar XE seemed smaller than the C.. Kind of reminds me of the E46 3-series If compare real physical figures, they have same length, Jag XE is wider though, wheelbase very similar also. The XE looks bigger to me maybe because of its design, more pronounced curves, less sharper lines or dips in body work like the C-class. I checked out the C-class, XE and latest A4 but the XE's leg room and foot space isn't very good. If I had to rank these 3, the C would be no.1, followed by A4 and the XE would be a very far no.3. In terms of interior design, it's up to individual preference. I didn't like it but others may dig it. It is more matured looking. Quality wise, the interior of the XE gave me this "hollow" feeling which the C or A4 didn't exude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
east41st 3rd Gear March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 Lol you are talking about 2 cars that are similarly cramped inside, of cuz the same. I suggest taking a look at C-class, the current latest gen one. The knee room and foot space is class leading. Jag XE is quite far behind. Width of door opening also slightly behind for the Jag. I am 1.80 meter tall and I don't really feel it is cramp. Sure they are not more spacious like say the E class, but frankly not that big a deal. Agree the rear door opening is slightly narrow for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion2006 Supersonic March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 Dunno about the Lexus but Jag XE is leather wrapped, dashboard as well as door panels or most of it, in black leather. I have the Jaguar "latte" trim which is beige in english. Its a lot nicer than the black trim. Seats and parts of door rests and cubby cover in beige leather. Dashboard is black with central panel in black piano. The combination of black and beige is a lot more classy looking. For the C180, understand that the standard trim is Not genuine leather. Its Artico leather, which I think is artificial stuff. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion2006 Supersonic March 5, 2016 Share March 5, 2016 XE had an impressive look to me when I first heard of it. Now, it doesn't seem as chio as I thought at the time. And the ongoing criticism of interior space seems like a letdown. Earlier posts had some dimensions showing JagXE having lowest height. I compare XE, C class and 3 series. Still think on looks alone Jag wins. It looks so much sportier. But agree, space wise c class wins ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Jaguar's Next Chapter, A Calculated or Suicidal Move?
Jaguar's Next Chapter, A Calculated or Suicidal Move?
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
RE :Jaguar Owners Servicing
RE :Jaguar Owners Servicing
Jaguar New Boss Explains Why The XJ Had To Die
Jaguar New Boss Explains Why The XJ Had To Die
Most noisy car fan
Most noisy car fan
sgCarMart E-HangOut with Jaguar - FB Live - 8PM, 4th March 2021
sgCarMart E-HangOut with Jaguar - FB Live - 8PM, 4th March 2021
Jaguar XF or Audi A5?
Jaguar XF or Audi A5?