Jump to content

Toyota Camry


Wish1719
 Share

Recommended Posts

(edited)

Which 2015 Camry variant would be a better buy?

 

The 2.0 or the 2.5?

 

How about the FC for both models from current owners?

 

Appreciate some thoughts. Thanks. :)

Edited by Lanky
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Which 2015 Camry variant would be a better buy?

 

The 2.0 or the 2.5?

 

How about the FC for both models from current owners?

 

Appreciate some thoughts. Thanks. :)

2.5 better equiped,only $4000 more.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2.5 better equiped,only $4000 more.

I agree on that. It is $6k more based on current prices. I read that the 2.0 is a new vvti-iw engine with direct injection that is more fuel efficient whereas the 2.5l is dual vvti. Both mated to 6 speed gearbox.

 

Still trying to decide. Would the 2.0 be under powered?

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

No cars is underpower nowadays ^_^ ,depends on what you need,if you are looking for "Boy Racer" performance,then this car is out for you,cannot compare the Camry's power with a Subaru WRX....the 2.0 Camry engine is a new high compression engine,which is a tad noiser..it work best on 98 petrol...

Edited by ER-3682
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still trying to decide. Would the 2.0 be under powered?

 

Whether enough power or not is very subjective. My own judgment is that if the 0-100km/h acceleration is within 11s, I think it is ok. The Camry 2.0 is 10.8s and the 2.5 is 9.2s. The 2.0 acceleration does appear a bit slow but within my acceptable range. When I test drive the Nissan X-trail 2.0, I feel it is underpower, and the 0-100km/h time is 12.1s

 

Although the price is just $6000 difference, you need to factor in the road tax difference as well. It is about $600 difference every year, so, 10 year, the difference is another $6000. I calculated the difference in annual cost (depreciation + roadtax + petrol) is about $1,350 per year for my mileage of 15000km/yr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bm has dropped the price of the camry significantly to match teana's price.

If they don't drop,it will be like another "Honda Accord",complete failure. [thumbsdown]

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they don't drop,it will be like another "Honda Accord",complete failure. [thumbsdown]

I think for luxury sedan like Camry, no matter how the Coe drop, they will somehow make sure there is a floor to the pricing so as to differentiate the offerings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

Past few mths on the road,only managed to spot 1 hybrid model. It seems the new camry is not selling well.

 

I really wanted to buy the camry FL, but when BM brought it in - they spec the worst stuff compared to what Thailand is getting. Very difficult to convince myself. In the end I rather get the Altis than Camry even though money not issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No cars is underpower nowadays ^_^ ,depends on what you need,if you are looking for "Boy Racer" performance,then this car is out for you,cannot compare the Camry's power with a Subaru WRX....the 2.0 Camry engine is a new high compression engine,which is a tad noiser..it work best on 98 petrol...

 

I was just thinking that if the car is too heavy for the 2.0, FC may suffer in start/stop traffic conditions. Definitely not looking for a performance car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Whether enough power or not is very subjective. My own judgment is that if the 0-100km/h acceleration is within 11s, I think it is ok. The Camry 2.0 is 10.8s and the 2.5 is 9.2s. The 2.0 acceleration does appear a bit slow but within my acceptable range. When I test drive the Nissan X-trail 2.0, I feel it is underpower, and the 0-100km/h time is 12.1s

 

Although the price is just $6000 difference, you need to factor in the road tax difference as well. It is about $600 difference every year, so, 10 year, the difference is another $6000. I calculated the difference in annual cost (depreciation + roadtax + petrol) is about $1,350 per year for my mileage of 15000km/yr.

 

I went to test drive both cars and decided on the 2.0. The differnce is there but i am not convinced to go to the 2.5.

 

Gonna give the new 2.0 vvt-iw engine which claims better FC a go. Also considered the additonal running costs you mentioned in my decison.

 

The 2.5 is the face-lifted 2012 model and the changes are only in the looks, everything else is the same.

 

Thanks for sharing your views

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No cars is underpower nowadays ^_^ ,depends on what you need,if you are looking for "Boy Racer" performance,then this car is out for you,cannot compare the Camry's power with a Subaru WRX....the 2.0 Camry engine is a new high compression engine,which is a tad noiser..it work best on 98 petrol...

 

I beg to differ bro. Thailand home market max octane at RON 95 only, and they are E10... meaning there's 10% Ethanol mix into the gasoline to keep the cost down.

 

Most drivers over there uses E20, which is 92octane mixed with 20% Ethanol.

 

All their cars, from Vios to Lambo, runs nicely over there.

 

 

Anyway the new engine is still too weak for the Camry. The Atkinson cycle does nothing except to boost fuel economy. Pure Atkinson cycle engine actually makes far less power than a same engine with conventional Otto cycle. You see how much hp the Prius 1.8 and Prius C gasoline engines are making? Those are running on pure Atkinson cycle.

 

Toyota merely incorp. 2 tech into one engine thanks to modern VVTi and fast ECU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they don't drop,it will be like another "Honda Accord",complete failure. [thumbsdown]

 

Why u say that.

For every new teana + mz6 + sonata + accord combined, i see way more new camrys than that.

 

Camry still sells well.

Interestingly enough, there are very few new cat B executive sedans on the road.

All the new cars are the cat As.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

 

Why u say that.

For every new teana + mz6 + sonata + accord combined, i see way more new camrys than that.

 

Camry still sells well.

Interestingly enough, there are very few new cat B executive sedans on the road.

All the new cars are the cat As.

Camry should be more as compared with others, cause it is a Toyota mah. Lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Camry should be more as compared with others, cause it is a Toyota mah. Lol.

 

yeah so if u say toyota don't sell well, seriously all the other brands can go eat xi bei feng already.

 

If Toyota drops it's camry price, u can see it will just gobble up the other AD sales.

Even if the camry is just an average car nowadays.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I beg to differ bro. Thailand home market max octane at RON 95 only, and they are E10... meaning there's 10% Ethanol mix into the gasoline to keep the cost down.

 

Most drivers over there uses E20, which is 92octane mixed with 20% Ethanol.

 

All their cars, from Vios to Lambo, runs nicely over there.

 

 

Anyway the new engine is still too weak for the Camry. The Atkinson cycle does nothing except to boost fuel economy. Pure Atkinson cycle engine actually makes far less power than a same engine with conventional Otto cycle. You see how much hp the Prius 1.8 and Prius C gasoline engines are making? Those are running on pure Atkinson cycle.

 

Toyota merely incorp. 2 tech into one engine thanks to modern VVTi and fast ECU.

 

VVT-Iw will make NA engine in start/stop traffic less responsive than otto cycle.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea how many speakers on Camry 2.5? It it generic or some known brands. Anyone one owning the new Camry upgrade their Ice?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...