Kia K5

[Notsogoodman]

 

Mine is the 2litre version and I'm only getting 8km/l, cant imagine 2.4litre, I think Mazda 6 sky active engine would most probably get the closest fc to what it claims.

Check out the Mazda6's thread, a number of owners are reporting 12km/l with the 2.5litre engine

[Kangadrool]

Bigger engine doesn't mean more thirster especially if it's fitted on the same model. 2.0L vs 2.5L Mazda6, no brainer = 2.5L will be "breathing easier and lighter" = better FC.

 

 

Mine is the 2litre version and I'm only getting 8km/l, cant imagine 2.4litre, I think Mazda 6 sky active engine would most probably get the closest fc to what it claims.

 

[Quantum]

Thanks for sharing the information on the FC. Other than K5, I tested a few K5 equivalent Japanese cars

 

Even though the paper specs is typically for best possible scenario, I tend to discount it by 3km/litres.

 

Mazda 6 2.5 - 15.2km/l

Toyota Camry 2.5 - 13km/l

Nissan Teana 2.5 - 13.3km/l

 

Hence, I think it should be realistic for luxury sedans to achieve an average of 10km/litre.

 

Looks like I have to explore more options and look at the upcoming i45 and Subaru Legacy.

How to evaulate a car's FC is quite subjective, depends on driving pattern, driving style, fuel grade etc, nowaways under new emission standard, Sedan categroy FC is not obvious different,

but normally Korean car a bit overstated their performance compare to same category Jap models,

so evaulate korean models performance, should diacount by 10 to 20%

[GLZT]

Bigger engine doesn't mean more thirster especially if it's fitted on the same model. 2.0L vs 2.5L Mazda6, no brainer = 2.5L will be "breathing easier and lighter" = better FC.

 

 

I beg to differ though, yes I do agree that bigger engine does not necessarily means higher consumption, but if you are talking about the same type of engine, it most probably means higher consumption.

 

Let's say we use factory test which derive the paper spec fc, I believe its a similar test between both vehicles, almost all models with different variant produce similar results, lower cc= lower fc. Even the Mazda 6 2.0 and 2.5 paper spec shows similar results.

 

Whether the engine 'breathe'(which I assume you are referring to air intake) easier or not I think highly depends on your air intake.

 

I mean after all, if your lungs(combustion chamber) is 10litres and you got a tiny windpipe, you wouldnt be able to utilize your large lungs.

Edited March 27, 2014 by GLZT

[ER-3682]

Yup, mine is the 2.4 version. Only 8 km/l in city driving. Still trying to adjust compared to the 1.6 that I had previously at about 11 to 12 km/l.

8km/L is very high,just ask,did you switch on your engine while waiting.?Tires pressure.?Heavy footed.?All city driving.?Alot of traffic jams.?Blah-blah...My Fairlady,also can hit 8.2km/L,with some sprint driving...

[Teatreeoil]

8km/L is very high,just ask,did you switch on your engine while waiting.?Tires pressure.?Heavy footed.?All city driving.?Alot of traffic jams.?Blah-blah...My Fairlady,also can hit 8.2km/L,with some sprint driving...

Fair lady engine I suppose different?

All city driving. Not much traffic lights. Light footer. No time spent on idling engine. Tyre pressure 240.

 

Some other k5 owners also reported this fc too..

[Tohto]

Fair lady engine I suppose different?

All city driving. Not much traffic lights. Light footer. No time spent on idling engine. Tyre pressure 240.

 

Some other k5 owners also reported this fc too..

Too light foot may not be always good for fc. As it take forever to reach cruising speed which is better for fc.

[Teatreeoil]

Too light foot may not be always good for fc. As it take forever to reach cruising speed which is better for fc.

Sure and will try.. But definitely not that type keep spamming on the accelerator. :)

[K5G1]

Sure and will try.. But definitely not that type keep spamming on the accelerator. :)

the 2.4L is the Theta engine also used in the previous Hyundai Sonata's ?

 

if so, you should be able to get about 9.5 ~ 10.5 km to the litre, with "normal" driving.. mixed city/highway, reasonable with the accelerator but with the ocassional spirited pickup's or sprints. this was what i averaged over the 6 years i had the Sonata NF.

 

a friend, driving the same 2.4L, claimed he averaged 12km/litre but kept his engine turning around 1500rpm as much as possible. I didn't bother to try but think there's merit in his story.

 

the engine comes on strong between 2500 ~ 3500 rpm, as i recalled,... that's when it felt good and the car was fun to drive. In fact, I asked for the 2.4L or TC version but C&C never intended to bring neither in at that time for the K5.

 

in fact, you should at least in theory get more km/litre... think the current engine was improved, and the newer cars are mated to a 6-speed trans (vs 4-speed on the Sonata NF).

 

humble advice... don't worry too much about the FC as it won't really make so much diff. Just enjoy your car and the drive, but do drive safely.... and be alert to those around you who may not drive so carefully.

[Teatreeoil]

the 2.4L is the Theta engine also used in the previous Hyundai Sonata's ?

 

if so, you should be able to get about 9.5 ~ 10.5 km to the litre, with "normal" driving.. mixed city/highway, reasonable with the accelerator but with the ocassional spirited pickup's or sprints. this was what i averaged over the 6 years i had the Sonata NF.

 

a friend, driving the same 2.4L, claimed he averaged 12km/litre but kept his engine turning around 1500rpm as much as possible. I didn't bother to try but think there's merit in his story.

 

the engine comes on strong between 2500 ~ 3500 rpm, as i recalled,... that's when it felt good and the car was fun to drive. In fact, I asked for the 2.4L or TC version but C&C never intended to bring neither in at that time for the K5.

 

in fact, you should at least in theory get more km/litre... think the current engine was improved, and the newer cars are mated to a 6-speed trans (vs 4-speed on the Sonata NF).

 

humble advice... don't worry too much about the FC as it won't really make so much diff. Just enjoy your car and the drive, but do drive safely.... and be alert to those around you who may not drive so carefully.

Sounds good.. Will update on the FC on the 2.4 litres K5 again.. fingers crossed though. 12km/litre is highly unlikely.. I will be glad if it can clock around 9 to 10 km per litre for this one. More driving and update again. =)

[Theredstar]

I beg to differ though, yes I do agree that bigger engine does not necessarily means higher consumption, but if you are talking about the same type of engine, it most probably means higher consumption.

 

Let's say we use factory test which derive the paper spec fc, I believe its a similar test between both vehicles, almost all models with different variant produce similar results, lower cc= lower fc. Even the Mazda 6 2.0 and 2.5 paper spec shows similar results.

 

Whether the engine 'breathe'(which I assume you are referring to air intake) easier or not I think highly depends on your air intake.

 

I mean after all, if your lungs(combustion chamber) is 10litres and you got a tiny windpipe, you wouldnt be able to utilize your large lungs.

 

If same body different engine

The smaller one will need to work harder to lug it around

 

Quite apparent in models with different CC

The bigger one can move off faster and easier without excessive revving

[Teatreeoil]

Hmmm.. Just wondering.. Are the other AD car servicing operating half day only? Kia car servicing centre is half day and can only go on Saturday to do the servicing due to work on weekdays. Any bros here facing same problem?

 

My previous ride is with BM and they do have afternoon and evening servicings :(

[ER-3682]

Hmmm.. Just wondering.. Are the other AD car servicing operating half day only? Kia car servicing centre is half day and can only go on Saturday to do the servicing due to work on weekdays. Any bros here facing same problem?

 

My previous ride is with BM and they do have afternoon and evening servicings :(

I also send my K3 in on Saturday,should finished oil change before they close.

[Duckling]

Have been driving the 2011 K5 for 2.5 yrs...90% city driving, average fuel comsuption is about 7-8 km/l (I keep a logbook on the petrol I pumped).

[Teatreeoil]

Have been driving the 2011 K5 for 2.5 yrs...90% city driving, average fuel comsuption is about 7-8 km/l (I keep a logbook on the petrol I pumped).

Actually I'm also worried about the fc. U think it is worth it if change to another car under another brand?

[Duckling]

Actually I'm also worried about the fc. U think it is worth it if change to another car under another brand?

Just enjoy the ride, your K5 has lots of feature that other 2.4L don't have.

 

If you're seriously concern abt FC, go for diesel car but be prepare for more regular servicing & higher tax.

 

Currently I use DBS Esso credit card, very good discount on petrol.

[GLZT]

Unless you are a hard core environmentalist, please don't let fc affect you to the extent that you want to change your car. Its not like its outrageous like under 5km/litre. In fact, during my 80% highway driving, I can achieve 9litres/100km.

[Yourboss]

Was informed by SE that Kia is bringing in the 2.0 variant. FC is slightly improved - 7.6L/100km. Power is 167bhp (vs 180bhp for 2.4litre). However, it seems like many features are taken away. Things like panaromic roof, infinity speakers, ventilated seats, etc.

 

Have not spoken to the SE myself but the pre-order price for the 2litre variant is $10k lower.