Jump to content

Scoot


I-LOVE-CARS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yup. Nothing wrong for budget airlines. 

 

But scoot needs to stop trying to portray themselves as being more premium than a typical budget airline since they are no different.

 

Absolutely correct.

 

I am flying the same route and timing to Bangkok

 

and the price by Scoot is so much more than Tiger.

 

I accept all this is my fault. It was my suggestion for

 

Scoot to take over Tiger so that they have more pricing

 

power and they did exactly that and now charging me more.

 

I regret it now and wish I didn't give free corporate strategy advice.

 

:D   

Edited by Jamesc
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i fly sq and many other airlines frequently and got this done. I dont know where you derive the basis of your initial comment from

Haha your second comment is so much more sensible than your first

 

Haha of course I don't like to pay $12 for assigned seats

 

but this is how airlines make money. They try and get the

 

fare price as low as possible and then screw you with the 

 

extras, check in luggage, food and drinks etc etc.

 

Any way $12 not to sit with my MIL is a small price to pay.

 

:D  

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha your second comment is so much more sensible than your first

 

I can always make sensible comments

 

but I can honestly say

 

I just never like doing it.  [thumbsup]

 

:D

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha of course I don't like to pay $12 for assigned seats

 

but this is how airlines make money. They try and get the

 

fare price as low as possible and then screw you with the

 

extras, check in luggage, food and drinks etc etc.

 

Any way $12 not to sit with my MIL is a small price to pay.

 

:D

The choice of scoot was made by tour agency not the traveller. Of course the cost of assigning seat is small change. But the principle of paying for programmer stupidity is just not acceptable
Link to post
Share on other sites

The choice of scoot was made by tour agency not the traveller. Of course the cost of assigning seat is small change. But the principle of paying for programmer stupidity is just not acceptable

 

I 100% agree with you.  [thumbsup]

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

While i empathise with the logic of people in one booking seating together, isn't the extra $ for CONFIRMING the fact that my kids are seated with me  every time?

 

(I'm also partly claustrophobic, so i definitely need an aisle seat)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The choice of scoot was made by tour agency not the traveller. Of course the cost of assigning seat is small change. But the principle of paying for programmer stupidity is just not acceptable

 

Ok. Tour agency tickets, i guess the frustration is understandable.

But if you book online on a budget airline, even if the 6 seats are all individual one pax seats, i don't see why anyone should complain.

Hope no delays for my TPE trip in November. Scoot had the most suitable flight timing for my kid friendly trip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here, people complain about delays on CX and want to boycott CX and travel SQ.

 

That's good, so fewer people to fight with me for the super economy saver seats on CX. :D

 

CX has been good to me.

Only thing bad bout cx is 48hrs b4 flight then can check in to choose seat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Tour agency tickets, i guess the frustration is understandable.

But if you book online on a budget airline, even if the 6 seats are all individual one pax seats, i don't see why anyone should complain.

I disagree with your point. Which passengers will make a group booking and expect to be seated away from each other? If you realised, airline booking system dont allow booking for kids to be done independently of the adult. The airline regulation also wants to ensure kids are taken care of by their own parents or guardians. So if they have the prerogative to split seating it already defeats this principle. And agency book a big group together, it will therefore follow that if they split this way, the kid will not end up with theie parents or guardians in somw instances.

 

Doesnt mean fly budget airlines have to suffer such stupidity? I hv flown on many other budget airlines and didnt have to go through this inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe programmer from India with MBA from Hawaii don't know what

 

uni the one declared by a lady who managed to keep her job.

 

It is stupid logic hope even less people fly with them so I can

 

sit next to more empty seats.

 

I came back from Korea once and all the seats were taken except

 

for 4 all empty so when no one was looking I spread out on all 4

 

and slept all the way back to Singapore.

 

:D  

 

This is a very strange arrangement by many airlines. Sometimes they clamp everyone into a single row and leave the other rows empty. When 4 persons booked together, they will spread them into 2 rows instead of giving them the centre 4 seats. Maybe computer system override their decision. haha

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Only thing bad bout cx is 48hrs b4 flight then can check in to choose seat

 

Yes, that's the thing about promo CX tickets. I just put it on my calendar and do it during the online check in.

 

I actually prefer their A350 compared to SQ. Seats more comfortable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very strange arrangement by many airlines. Sometimes they clamp everyone into a single row and leave the other rows empty. When 4 persons booked together, they will spread them into 2 rows instead of giving them the centre 4 seats. Maybe computer system override their decision. haha

 

 

Maybe something to do with weight balancing.

 

Must spread the weight evenly left and right

 

front and back.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with your point. Which passengers will make a group booking and expect to be seated away from each other? If you realised, airline booking system dont allow booking for kids to be done independently of the adult. The airline regulation also wants to ensure kids are taken care of by their own parents or guardians. So if they have the prerogative to split seating it already defeats this principle. And agency book a big group together, it will therefore follow that if they split this way, the kid will not end up with theie parents or guardians in somw instances.

 

Doesnt mean fly budget airlines have to suffer such stupidity? I hv flown on many other budget airlines and didnt have to go through this inconvenience.

 

Budget airlines mah. My expectation is very low. To me even if u get 2-2-2 i don't really think it's unfair to the group (as long as children weren't split up from their parents).

WYPIWYG

 

So how were the group of 6 split due to the algorithm error?

Edited by Lala81
Link to post
Share on other sites

So in a normal budget airline for 2 Adult, 2 children.

So if i don't book my seating before hand, someone would be angry that 1 pair (1A + 1C) seat at the front, 1 pair seat at the back of the aircraft?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Budget airlines mah. My expectation is very low. To me even if u get 2-2-2 i don't really think it's unfair to the group (as long as children weren't split up from their parents).

WYPIWYG

 

So how were the group of 6 split due to the algorithm error?

Haha there you confirmed it that your expectation is very low bcos it is budget flight. I differ in expecting they had some common sense in that if they dont allow kids booking to be done singly then they should also return the favour by making sure the kids are allowed to sit with their parents. The principle of having the kid parents look after their kids is consistently practised

 

The split is such that 1 kid goes to sit with another group.

Edited by Acemundo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha there you confirmed it that your expectation is very low bcos it is budget flight. I differ in expecting they had some common sense in that if they dont allow kids booking to be done singly then they should also return the favour by making sure the kids are allowed to sit with their parents. The principle of having the kid parents look after theie keep is consistently practised

 

The split is such that 1 kid goes to sit with another group.

 

I dunno, i grew up watching american movies/tv shows, and the shows always show everyone seating at different seats  [laugh]  [:p]

then they shout here shout there haha 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno, i grew up watching american movies/tv shows, and the shows always show everyone seating at different seats [laugh][:p]

then they shout here shout there haha

Haha yes they are afterall fictional. Dont forget american cultures are more independent where kids move out to stay on their own much younger than our kids in this part of the world.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe something to do with weight balancing.

 

Must spread the weight evenly left and right

 

front and back.

 

:D

 

Only last time SAF chartered flight gave that crappy excuse  reason that when we asked why cannot sit at the empty front (biz and first class) seats....

 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...