Neighbours from hell...

[Beregond]

1 hour ago, Carbon82 said:

 

But if the errant couple refuse to move, Mr See could find himself saddled with another long court process to privately prosecute them for breaching the court order.

 

i think its a big insult to our system if the errant couple refuse to move with this order in place, and police cannot thow them in prison and the victim have to suffer longer.

we shall see.

[13177]

52 minutes ago, Beregond said:

i think its a big insult to our system if the errant couple refuse to move with this order in place, and police cannot thow them in prison and the victim have to suffer longer.

we shall see.

Sadly there is no law here to enforce on neighbours who are a nuisance to others. If they have law that if the neighbour continue to create noise, they would get fine or house get confiscate by HDB, maybe these people will scare and stop all the nuisance.

[inlinesix]

1 hour ago, Beregond said:

i think its a big insult to our system if the errant couple refuse to move with this order in place, and police cannot thow them in prison and the victim have to suffer longer.

we shall see.

No worries! The errant couple will insult our system.

[Kusje]

system is working as it should.

this kind of problems don't affect rich people since their neighbors are all far far away so why need to have a system that properly handles such problems?

except for the siaolang ferrari lady case of course.

[Beregond]

1 hour ago, 13177 said:

Sadly there is no law here to enforce on neighbours who are a nuisance to others. If they have law that if the neighbour continue to create noise, they would get fine or house get confiscate by HDB, maybe these people will scare and stop all the nuisance.

actually there are law on fixing ' being a nuisance to others' if not the court order wont be out.

its only whether our police is able to implement the law.or its a white elephant only

[Kusje]

Just now, Beregond said:

actually there are law on fixing ' being a nuisance to others' if not the court order wont be out.

its only whether our police is able to implement the law.or its a white elephant only

there is a law but the law has no teeth for enforcement and that's the problem being highlighted in this case. 

[Sdf4786k]

After two years and multiple trips to court, a man has succeeded in barring his noisy neighbours from returning home for a month.

For the first time, the Community Dispute Resolution Tribunal (CDRT) has issued an Exclusion Order and directed a couple to leave their residence, after they were found to have breached an earlier court order to stop creating a din and preventing Mr Daniel See, 29, from enjoying his home.

***

But i still think difficult to enforce. Lets see if every flat start to kei siao than will be bad.

[13177]

Barring his noisy neighbours from returning home for a month? Then what happen after one month? Lol.

[Wt_know]

5 minutes ago, 13177 said:

Barring his noisy neighbours from returning home for a month? Then what happen after one month? Lol.

at least teach them a lesson

whether they will mellow down or behave normally 

after 1-month perhaps he will step up the “fun” ...  

Edited January 6, 2020 by Wt_know

[Sdf4786k]

9 minutes ago, Wt_know said:

at least teach them a lesson

whether they will mellow down or behave normally 

after 1-month perhaps he will step up the “fun” ...  

Two years seems a long time to come to a conclusion. I wonder if its a matter of ...

I can do what ever i want and theres nothing you can do about it.

Or

You compliant , clever, go lor, i got human rights.

 

After two years and two court orders, a man in Bukit Panjang says he is still being plagued by noise from his neighbours living in the unit below — and it shows no signs of stopping.

Daniel See, 29, who left his job in June in order to spend more time collecting evidence against his neighbours, has now applied for an Exclusion Order to evict his neighbours from their flat, according to a Straits Times report.

But his neighbours, identified only as the Lius, denied See's allegations in an interview with Shin Min Daily News and said that that they will file an appeal if they are ordered to evict.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Sdf4786k

[inlinesix]

@Carbon82 need to merge this thread with neighbour from hell

[Hamburger]

I thought referring to across causeway.

[Victor68]

If proven is a nuisance,  then should punish them properly. Mental problem send to mental doctor. Why waste court time and tax payer money? 

[inlinesix]

Quote

被仲裁庭发出驱逐令禁返住家一个月的夫妇，今早仍在单位内出现，家人跟媒体说：“有什么去找我们的律师谈”。

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/znews/singapore/story20200106-1018831

 

[Sdf4786k]

2 hours ago, Victor68 said:

If proven is a nuisance,  then should punish them properly. Mental problem send to mental doctor. Why waste court time and tax payer money? 

Should just confiscate their flat and throw them out. But that would give rise to the fact that hdb is a lease and not own as one would expect,

 

[13177]

18 minutes ago, Sdf4786k said:

Should just confiscate their flat and throw them out. But that would give rise to the fact that hdb is a lease and not own as one would expect,

 

Confiscate their flat then people would scare. Cause now no law can do anything to them, so these people can continue creating noise since nothing will happen to them at all.

[Windwaver]

So moral of the story is live in HDB better because can have an affordable and legal means to deal with nonsense neighbors 

[therock]

The Law...

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/noisy-neighbours-case-couple-who-flout-court-order-risk-jail-minlaw

 

Quote

A noisy couple who did not comply with an Exclusion Order to move out of their home risk facing "serious consequences" including jail of up to three months, said the Ministry of Law (MinLaw).

They could also be prosecuted by the state, said a State Courts spokesman.

The Community Disputes Resolution Tribunal (CDRT) has barred Madam Iwa and Mr Low Bok Siong from their home for a month, with effect from Monday. This was the first-ever Exclusion Order issued by the tribunal.

The couple were found guilty of breaching an earlier court order to stop creating a din and preventing their upstairs neighbour, Mr Daniel See, 29, from enjoying his home.

Mr See lives in a three-room Housing Board flat a floor above the couple. Their dispute started in 2017.

Mr Low's son had told The Straits Times on Monday that the family did not intend to comply with the order because it was "full of typo (errors)" and served to him by the complainant, Mr See, and not the court.

In response, the State Courts spokesman said "the effective date of the exclusion was erroneously stated to be 6 January 2019 when it should have been 6 January 2020. An amended Exclusion Order was issued to the complainant on 6 January 2020 to correct this error".

Yesterday, Mr See pasted this order on the couple's front door.

Addressing the suggestion by Mr Low's son that an order served by a complainant need not be complied with, the spokesman said: "This is not true. In civil proceedings, service of documents, including court orders, on a respondent/defendant will be carried out by the complainant/plaintiff."