Jump to content

[Error] Mazda & Vezel Thread


Poortraveller
 Share

Recommended Posts

No matter how I google, there seems to be very few pics of the rear seats... is it because it's even worse than the Mazda CX3 so Toyota doesn't dare to show it ?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

See pic from Google, seem to stretch from boot to rear passenger or no?

 

Had seen my ride boot area dismantled to bare min for some installations. From what i see, hybrid batt does not extend to the rear seats.

Edited by Splashee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

talking about CHR, there are quite a number of videos online in youtube showing the interior. Personally don't really like the head unit display, need to see the actual car

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a Honda Vezel killer, may be the next hottest thing as the Vezel becomes passé, those who can wait, should really consider the CHR.

Another thing to note is the car will drive like a Toyota. Good for some but not many ppl will like it.

Rear head room will no doubt be like Juke. The position of the rear door handle looks out of place just so it's different from Vezel. Might as well have the handle on the roof! Maybe final production model may be changed.

Toyota has always been a boring drive and usually bad siting position. However it almost never fails. With exception to the 1st gen Thai Altis...QC was bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that in the video that you posted, there are still no pics of the rear..

I guess they don't want folks to see how tiny it may be...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get chr. Both interior and exterior rocks. Only concern is rear headroom. A bit juke like though from rear. Got a PI bringing it in it seems. 1.2 turbo 116bhp.

 

Who cares about that puny hp.  What's important is the torque, 190NM.  It is similar to 2L NA engine.

I notice that in the video that you posted, there are still no pics of the rear..

I guess they don't want folks to see how tiny it may be...

 

Tell you to read more, don't listen.

 

It is NOT suitable for you.

 

This SAV is targetted at DINK or yuppie.  This group of customers don't care about rear seat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Another thing to note is the car will drive like a Toyota. Good for some but not many ppl will like it.

Rear head room will no doubt be like Juke. The position of the rear door handle looks out of place just so it's different from Vezel. Might as well have the handle on the roof! Maybe final production model may be changed.

Toyota has always been a boring drive and usually bad siting position. However it almost never fails. With exception to the 1st gen Thai Altis...QC was bad.

This CHR may be a game changer, with a 1. 2l turbo engine, the Vezel looks boring as hell
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

This CHR may be a game changer, with a 1. 2l turbo engine, the Vezel looks boring as hell

 

looks interesting, though the rear seems compact, must see the actual car

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Another thing to note is the car will drive like a Toyota. Good for some but not many ppl will like it.

Rear head room will no doubt be like Juke. The position of the rear door handle looks out of place just so it's different from Vezel. Might as well have the handle on the roof! Maybe final production model may be changed.

Toyota has always been a boring drive and usually bad siting position. However it almost never fails. With exception to the 1st gen Thai Altis...QC was bad.

Just saw the video posted here. Hmm can the HU be folded and slide inward? If not than this will be the major turn off for some buyer. Don't you think it look like praying alter?

 

I agree on the rear handle. Look a bit funny at that angle. At least vezrl rear sit inside the rear triangle (I don't know how to describe). Juke handle also better looking.

 

Personally don't like the rear lamp. Too sharp. Not smooth flowing type. Look like transformer type of design. Some might like this kind of design.

 

By the way hardly see the suzuki vitara on the road. I like that design more than this Toyota.

Edited by Kopites
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This CHR may be a game changer, with a 1. 2l turbo engine, the Vezel looks boring as hell

QQ also 1.2T already mah.

Just saw the video posted here. Hmm can the HU be folded and slide inward? If not than this will be the major turn off for some buyer. Don't you think it look like praying alter?

 

I agree on the rear handle. Look a bit funny at that angle. At least vezrl rear sit inside the rear triangle (I don't know how to describe). Juke handle also better looking.

 

Personally don't like the rear lamp. Too sharp. Not smooth flowing type. Look like transformer type of design. Some might like this kind of design.

 

By the way hardly see the suzuki vitara on the road. I like that design more than this Toyota.

Like their latest Prius rear! Over designed. I like ur Alter description!
Link to post
Share on other sites

This CHR may be a game changer, with a 1. 2l turbo engine, the Vezel looks boring as hell

Agreed. However, i noticed that some pics on the net is like featuring the concept version? Must see the actual car when it is available.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

 

 

Here you go for sharing.

 

To that chap that said I sprout nonsense unless you has other alternative or suggestion. Do not post to discredit others. Keep quiet and move on.

Actually your initial answer almost read like it should not happen on Vezel. I have to read twice to get what you mean. Also your second solution sound like its a bad thing and should be fix, which is not really the case here as its normal.

 

So not surprised others misinterpreted it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually your initial answer almost read like it should not happen on Vezel. I have to read twice to get what you mean. Also your second solution sound like its a bad thing and should be fix, which is not really the case here as its normal.

 

So not surprised others misinterpreted it.

My posting was directed at bruce_neo.

 

The post was about the water condensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

 

This video got show interior (front and rear).

Interior definitely looks better quality than vezel. Imho vezel interior really cheapo plastics and basic, especially the door armrest. Super bare and backdated. Edited by Andyngps
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interior definitely looks better quality than vezel. Imho vezel interior really cheapo plastics and basic, especially the door armrest. Super bare and backdated.

 

I think we have to assess the HRV / Vezel for what it is.

 

Superb interior space

Superb FC

MIJ

Good design

 

Actually the NVH, and finish is already better than past Civics, so if we want better NVH, then we may need to spend Lexus money, or pile on the kilos to add bitumen, and then the acceleration is also affected.

So the power isn't that of a hot rod, but in most cases in SG, it should be fine. My concern is of course with merging with traffic, and higher speeds on the NS highway.

 

For more power, better interior, there are brands like VW, BMW, Merc etc, but are these brands actually more reliable?

 

The MIJ tag is something worth paying for IMO. It definitely means something, because I have been reading this thread and other foreign ones, and essentially very few real faults have been reported. Definitely less than even Merc, BMW etc.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nonsense. No offense.

Why is that nonsense? It helps the condenser to dry off. Prevents growth of molds which cause smell and harbour bacteria growth...
↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...