Search the Community

E-scooter rider in kungfu kick saga jailed, Certis enforcement officer sacked https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/e-scooter-rider-in-kungfu-kick-saga-jailed-certis-enforcement-officer-sacked Sweet chin music officer sacked, PMD rider jailed 6 days. to Mr KISHOK. KIck SHiOK!

From this video, one of the conclusions we can draw from it is when you have just been given a ticket by the parking officer, threatening him on whether he knows who you are or not isn't going to help you get out of trouble. As seen on SG Road Vigilante's recent post on 23rd of September 2020, the offender has just gotten a parking ticket along Sturdee Road North and can be seen trying to video down the whole confrontation with the officer who just gave him a ticket. Obviously not that good at redeeming himself, the owner of the video tries to 'put pressure' on the officer by asking him whether 'he knows who he is?' and claiming that the officer is less clear about the laws than him. If you are curious as to what happens next, catch the video below and let us know how you would react if you happen to be in such a situation.

Certis Cisco officer found dead with gunshot wound to head By Alvina Soh | Posted: 29 January 2013 2014 hrs SINGAPORE: A Certis Cisco officer was found dead with a gunshot wound to her head in a toilet of the Supreme Court on Tuesday afternoon, said the police. The deceased was a Chinese woman in her early 20s who had been working with Certis Cisco for about one year. At about 1.20pm, police received a call informing them that a person was found injured at the court's toilet cubicle. There was a gunshot wound to her head and her service revolver was found beside her. She was pronounced dead by paramedics at about 1.35pm. No foul play was suspected. Police investigations are ongoing. - CNA/al ________________________________________________________________________ More and more aux police officers shooting themselves. This is getting worrying. Not sure what the hiring standard is for these aux police. Will some of them start shooting the public if they go mad?

I've been getting summoned for parking outside my house which is a continuous white line, okay I know im wrong I breached the rules. However, the way they run things really pissed me off. Firstly out of all the residents car that parked outside of their house (there were around 20 plus or more) only 3-4 got summoned. So one of the day which is yesterday, I caught that guy issuing me a ticket to my car, so I came out and asked why he only summoned specific cars only. He said they will only issue ticket to cars that the residence around that area complain, so I was like okay if that's the case I complain to him right on the spot and demand him to summon the rest of the cars then. He told me I need to call up the LTA hotline to make a report first, which is totally nonsense. It takes time to call them, and by the time they send another traffic warden down is already another 1hr plus or sometimes they do not appear at all! So this time round I was really pissed off, I called the LTA and request them to summon all the cars around the area. they say ok they will send someone down, I said someone is already down here so why can't they do something immediately. they said they need to go through some SOP before the traffic warden can issue. Then I was like ok, and the stupid procedure takes like years to process...so I get this traffic warden to wait here till they get the info to summoned. by then Ive had enough of waiting as its already 12 midnight and I don't have all day to play with them, so I called the supervisor to come down also and demand an explanation to this. The supervisor came down and gave the same lame excuse where they summoned cars only complained by the residence. I was like WTF? ok so I did made a complain earlier on so can u summon the rest of the vehicles, so they called their office to check and stuffs after so long then they decided to tell me okay they will summon every vehicles...but after driving around looking they decided not to summon and back out of their words....seriously wtf is going on?! they like to summon they summon don't like then don't summon? so okay I called the LTA officer today, she told me that they will only summon those cars complaint and with the carplate number given to them....I was like WTF?!?! seriously that's really b-------t...if u wanna enforce the rule then enforce all out...why do some half fuk job... I will be taking down those carplate numbers later on and gonna complaint to them...see what are they gonna do about it...if still not summon issue, I think there is really some unfairness and biasness in the way LTA and Certis Cisco run things.... sorry for the long post...just ranting

Yesterday evening about 6 plus along Eunos Link junction Bedok Reservoir towards Hougang saw a PLAIN CLOTH man on top of the overhead bridge with a cam aiming at the bus lane. Most likely a CERTIS MAN. Pls share if they are seen in other parts of SG.

Just fined by Certis Cisco at outside Compass Point. Offence: "600070 - (LV) PARK AT UNBROKEN DOUBLE YELLOW LINES UNDER RULE E 22(b) RTR". There is nothing behind the offence notice but it says that the Traffic Offence will be sent to the registered owner of the vehicle in due course. Can any of you give me the email address so that I can try to appeal? Where should I write to? Traffic Police? LTA? I think its $70 fine. I left 2 passenger inside the car with hazard light on and went to fetch my old aged mother and took about about 3 minutes. Attendant spoke to the passenger to drive and when the passenger said that she is not confident to drive, he immediately issued a summon. I wanted to go into the shooping centre car park but it was full and cars were queueing outside. Yes it is my mistake but I would like to appeal. Thank you.

Rude? Issuing fines indescrimately? Power tripping? Exerting otherwise non-existent authority? In civilian life they are nothing. But put them in uniform and they think they are god.

What happen to our highly rated CERTIS CISCO? So many cases of report loss. Somemore, the lost jewellery can come back (or walk back) to the deposit box =============================== http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/stomp/sg...odged_in_3.html 8 reports of loss items from Certis CISCO safe boxes lodged in 3 weeks Eight reports of items being lost from Certis CISCO safe boxes have been lodged in the past three weeks since one of its customers, Mr Tham Choon Kan, reported that $40,000 worth of jewellery went missing from his safe box on July 11. Mr Tham had spoken to the press about the missing jewellery. According to a Straits Times report (Aug 16) Mr Tham's items were found in the box a few days later. The report says that another customer claimed to have lost about $20,000 worth of jewellery. A Certis CISCO spokesman confirmed that the report had been lodged by Madam S. E. Goh, 50. The claim relates to a diamond bangle and a cat's-eye ring, which Madam Goh found missing from her box in June, and made a police report a month later. A letter from the security company was delivered to Madam Goh at 10pm on Tuesday (Aug 14) to remind her to check her home and office for the lost items. STOMPer Jean, who ascertained with STOMP that Madam Goh is her mother, had made a post about the letter that said that her mum should not make any public statements or approach the media during the police investigation. Madam Goh said, "I was hoping that they had found my jewellery and were bringing them to me, but they gave me a letter telling me to keep mum and asked me to sign an acknowledgement slip. It is very tactless on their part to treat clients like that." A Certis CISCO spokesman told The Straits Times that the company had sent letters to seven clients who filed reports about alleged missing items. However, two clients who also claimed items were missing and had spoken to the press did not receive the letters. In a press statement, the Certis Cisco spokesman said that clients who issue public statements raise "undue concerns and panic" over the security of its facilities. According to the Straits Times report, only 25 reports of losses have been made since 1986, and six of these cases were dropped after customers found the items at home. The spokesman said seven levels of security are in place at each of the company's facilities, with four auxiliary police officers on guard, and closed-circuit television units located outside each safety deposit room. Photo identity is also needed to access each box. Madam Goh said that thorough audits should be conducted as soon as possible by a third party to verify the company's claims of tight security controls. She has removed all her valuables from the box and will not be renewing her contract when it ends next year.