Another rape case

[BanCoe]

simple.  malay mother got 3 sons and remarried to an indian (since can only understand tamil).

 

the second son is staying with the mom and raped the mom.  mom runs off to first son place and took the audio recording over phone.  third son also briefly spoke and attest the 2nd brother is filial son.

 

second son's defendant lawyer is trying to suggest mother and stepfather framed 2nd second son in a bid to kick him out of the house.

Liddat now you know I am only Preambaree For study only now

TQ for explaining so long grandmother reporter stoly in 3 lines

You are indeed   and an Ace!

This will be helpful to @radx n @vratenza who are only Preambaree Tree 2.

[RadX]

i read the article also cannot understand clearly whats really going on.... so many characters with different inputs

Some more some speak Malay, some Tamil...... dont know whats that got to do with the crime....  some more got recording  ;

 

 

moral of story is dun peek at chiobu during class

 

PAY ATTENTION

1

[Ktglfc]

simple.  malay mother got 3 sons and remarried to an indian (since can only understand tamil).

 

the second son is staying with the mom and raped the mom.  mom runs off to first son place and took the audio recording over phone.  third son also briefly spoke and attest the 2nd brother is filial son.

 

second son's defendant lawyer is trying to suggest mother and stepfather framed 2nd second son in a bid to kick him out of the house.

 

 

Seeing yours is much clearer than the reporter's one ... ask the reporter go fly kite lah

[RadX]

Omg....u guys are funny.

 

MyClownForum

 

@vratenza the new head...haha

[Acemundo]

Seeing yours is much clearer than the reporter's one ... ask the reporter go fly kite lah

 

haha thanks.  I like to simplify things as the world is already complicated enough.

[Jman888]

no evident how to prove?

Son accused of raping mum: Swab from woman not tested due to mix-up

The Straits Times Friday, Jul 22, 2016

Selina Lum

 

A vaginal swab taken from a woman who was allegedly raped by her biological son was never tested for semen because of a mix-up.

 

The High Court heard this on the sixth day of an ongoing rape trial which, so far, has not thrown up conclusive physical evidence against the accused.

 

The 33-year-old man is charged with raping and molesting his mother, 56, after he returned home at about 2.30am on Oct 4, 2013.

 

He is the second of the woman's three sons from her first marriage, and lived with her and his stepfather in a one-bedroom flat.

 

His lawyer said earlier that his mother and stepfather had conspired to accuse him of rape, in a bid to make him leave the flat.

 

Yesterday, Singapore General Hospital (SGH) gynaecologist Tan Wei Ching testified about her medical examination of the woman, just hours after the alleged rape.

 

The issue of the vaginal swab taken from the woman to test for semen arose when Dr Tan was questioned by defence lawyer Andy Lem about an e-mail sent by the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) in May 2014 asking about the whereabouts of the swab.

 

Dr Tan said that the swab, which was placed in a wet container, was sent from SGH to HSA on Oct 4 - the day of the alleged rape and the day the swab was taken - but was rejected by HSA as it was in an "inappropriate medium".

 

Three days later, the swab was returned to SGH's accident and emergency (A&E) department. But Dr Tan said she was unaware of this.

 

Further investigations showed that after receiving the swab, SGH's A&E department forwarded it to the hospital's microbiology laboratory.

 

Mr Lem said it was "a bit surprising" that Dr Tan was notified by HSA only about six month's later, in May 2014. "I'm surprised too," she replied.

 

Dr Tan was not asked in court why the swab was placed in a wet container.

 

On the first day of the trial, a DNA analyst from HSA had testified that it was the practice to use dry containers as moisture could contaminate the swab.

 

Dr Tan was also questioned about her examination of the alleged victim.

 

In her report, Dr Tan said she did not detect any bleeding, open wounds, bruising or lacerations on the woman's body.

 

Mr Lem suggested that, given the woman's account of the sexual assault, it was more likely than not that she would have suffered physical injuries.

 

Dr Tan said it was possible but said the absence of injuries did not mean that the assault did not take place.

 

[email protected]

 

 

 

 

[Maxus-MIFA9]

 

no evident how to prove?

 

 

 

They (police) never seized the mattress ? 

 

MY police still the

[Jamesc]

33 year old still live with parents.

 

Strawberry generation.

 

[Spring]

 

no evident how to prove?

 

 

This case is strange to say the least.

 

Surely,AG Chambers won't be so silly as to press charges against this guy if simple evidence like vaginal swab not tested for semen is not done. Unless they have other solid evidence, layman in me sees this whole episode as a big cock-up based on the initial court proceedings which is very unlike AG Chambers. 

[BanCoe]

33 year old still live with parents.

 

Strawberry generation.

 

no lah - Filial Son lah!

[Nzy]

33 year old still live with parents.

 

Strawberry generation.

 

Why? I thought its better. My mum doesn't want me to move out. Everytime ask me to continue renting out my house so I can continue staying with them. My grandmother also the same. Ask my uncle to rent out his house and stay with her.

[Jamesc]

Why? I thought its better. My mum doesn't want me to move out. Everytime ask me to continue renting out my house so I can continue staying with them. My grandmother also the same. Ask my uncle to rent out his house and stay with her.

 

That's cos you a Filial Son lah!

 

That one drank alcohol, smoked cannabis and created disturbances at home

 

- havoc son.

 

 

[Jamesc]

I like to read about lape so that's why I am here.

 

Those goody goody listian people I don't know

 

what they are doing here. Educational reasons?

 

[BanCoe]

I like to read about lape so that's why I am here.

 

Those goody goody listian people I don't know

 

what they are doing here. Educational reasons?

 

i am Preambaree For educated............ so what say you?? ...... and also Filial Son........sometimes havoc

Edited July 22, 2016 by BanCoe

[Joseph22]

33 year old still live with parents.

 

Strawberry generation.

 

Singapore Lor.. Single below 35 cannot own HDB flat. If rich enough can buy condo though.

[Kusje]

 

no evident how to prove?

 

 

 

Wah lau. Heads need to roll leh. This is the second alleged rape semen sample where we had a screw up happen!!!

 

The first one was where the retarded policeman swabbed the wrong car seat and didn't reswab even after he found out that he was wrong.

[Jman888]

Fadly &  Hazly    

Jail, caning for 2 who raped victim after getting her drunk

BY VALERIE KOH PUBLISHED: 2:15 PM, JULY 29, 2016

 

SINGAPORE – After plying their victim with hard liquor at a birthday party held in a hotel, the two young men decided to rape her, one after another.

 

Muhammad Fadly Abdull Wahab was sentenced to 13 years jail and eight strokes of the cane, while his accomplice Muhammad Hazly Mohamad Halimi was jailed for 11 years and given six strokes of the cane.

 

On Jan 25, 2014, Fadly, who is now 20, invited the victim – an acquaintance he met at a club months earlier – to a friend’s party at Duxton Hotel that night. The victim, who cannot be named due to a gag order, did not know anyone else at the party, and agreed to go on the condition that her male friend could join too.

 

Around 10:40pm, Fadly told Hazly over Whatsapp that he wanted to get the victim drunk. Hazly, currently 23, replied: “If you want to (get her) drunk buy one more ah.”

 

The victim and her friend arrived around midnight on Jan 26. After a round of introductions to the rest of the partygoers, Fadly started to pour drinks for her. She downed six glasses of hard liquor on an empty stomach and was reluctant to drink a seventh glass, because she felt tipsy.

 

Fadly, however, reassured her that he would look after her ‘if anything were to happen”. After drinking the seventh glass, she started vomiting and could barely stand straight.

 

Around 1:15am, the rest of the partygoers proceeded to Zouk, leaving Fadly and Hazly to care for the victim. They brought her to the bathroom to clean up the vomit, and later moved her to the bed.

 

She was unconscious by then, and they decided to take a photograph of her in a semi-dressed state. The photograph – which Fadly later sent to a common friend he had with the victim – also showed the two men posing and smiling. Fadly also sent the friend the following message: “U miss the fun man!”

 

Later, the victim vomited again, and they brought her to the bathroom once more. Hazly stayed there to wash his shirt, which had vomit on it, while Fadly brought her back to the bed.

 

At this point, Fadly proceeded to rape her as she lay on the bed with her eyes closed. After finishing, he urged his friend to “go la, go la”. Hazly then raped her.

 

During the night, Fadly deleted his contact details from her handphone, and blocked her on social media platforms. After leaving the hotel the next day, the victim wanted to contact Fadly to ask about what had happened, but found that his contact details were missing.

 

She then asked their common friend to find out the truth. During a text message conversation, Fadly told this friend that he would have done the same, if he had been at the party as well. “U will… because we are men,” Fadly said.

 

In a statement tendered to the court, the victim, now 21, said that she could only remember “bits and pieces” of what had happened.

 

“I was feeling stupid and angry with myself for putting myself in such a situation… when I reached home, I took a shower and noticed there was blood when I urinated,” she said, adding that she washed herself repeatedly because she felt “unclean”.

 

Fadly’s lawyer Ismail Hamid pointed out that the victim willingly drank the alcohol that night.

 

“At no point did our client force or coerce her to drink. She’s not a naïve country bumpkin, she had the liberty to stop drinking. When she started vomiting, our client stopped pouring her drinks,” he said.

 

However, Deputy Public Prosecutor Charlene Tay Chia argued that Fadly had taken “concerted steps” to intoxicate the victim. “He offered her false reassurance that he would take care of her, if she got drunk,” she said, adding that Fadly had shown a complete lack of remorse or regard for the victim’s dignity by encouraging his friend to rape her.

 

The semi-nude photograph which Fadly had circulated was clearly meant as a bragging right, and demonstrated “flippant” degradation of his victim, said the DPP Chia.

 

Hazly’s lawyer Mohamed Muzammil Mohamed said that his client was extremely remorseful. But he also maintained that the victim had said, “I love you, I love you, some more, some more,” to Hazly during the rape.

 

DPP Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz fired back that the victim had been unconscious throughout the incident.

 

“This case calls for an exemplary sentence – one that pierces false stereotype and wrong assumptions about rapes and sexual assaults of intoxicated victims,” she said.

 

Another three partygoers, who returned to the hotel room around 3:45am that night, have been charged in relation to this case. Their trial opens next week.

 

 

 

[BanCoe]

 

Fadly &  Hazly    

 

 

Teruk lah!!  all of them ,   but the victim is now scarred for life;

 

But this guys wanted to show how strong their male prowess was I guess and wanted to show off to their friend their kill trophy

 

That Fadly was like just turned adult @ 18 when he did it and Hazly was like 21 , What a pair Fad and Haz