Jump to content

Middle class blues


Mockngbrd
 Share

Recommended Posts

What offence ? Yours is an objective discussion and sharing, instead of starting with "the pap internet brigade .." . [laugh] anyway i do see where you are coming from and the valid points you have made.

 

Haha.. My worry is that since there is not much way of conveying tone online, especially between people with vastly differing opinion, it's easy to offend others and get into a flame war, which isn't constructive. So, if I mis-read something, just say sorry, and move on lor.

 

Ah well, politics, always a touchy topic online, along with religion.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

I believe the leaders are aware of the gini coefficient and the relative groups/ deciles making up that number.

 

It is a matter of overall strategy and choice/ decisions.

 

As vb said previously (when he was in mcys), they have the numbers.

 

I would think previously (15 -20 years ago), the makeup is similar to an olive seed. Tapered to both ends and big/ fat/ wide in the middle.

Especially for the past 3-5 years, fat middle is moving down slowly to the mid-lower end, while the decision makers try to attract the high end.

I do believe they did try to fill up the lower middle since it was easier to give out pink IC to such than those with more options. Msm should have the facts on new citizens during 2006-2011 in terms of household income.

Edited by Oblong
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure there are as many less successful ones out there. but my point is, the opportunity is out there as evidently cited, and it is up to individual to realise their potential and maximise their achievements. if one hasnt achieved success, dont blame on others or FTs. what you said about many times cannot find suitable candidate is very true, and that is exactly why we need FTs.

 

Long ago i went for a job interview at a organisation somewhere in yio chu kang, inside the very big building i saw hordes of workers of indian nationality (hundreds of them). during the interview i was asked to rate myself for the skill set required, and i rated as 7 out of 10. i was outright rejected politely, as the interviewer told me, they take in people who are at last 8 to 9 out of 10 proficiency in the skill set. i understood till today, because the org needed the best and right person to get the job done, not just a singaporean. today, few of my superiors are PRs, and earning much more than me. Why dont i question why our gahment doesnt protect its ccitizen and give the best job for its people ? i hold no grudges because i understand it is only because they are better than me, and it is for the good of the organisation. if it is not for this meritocracy system, we woudnt even be near where we are today. The gahment did right to attract investments to sgp, build the infrastrcuutre and a ecological system, educate the young. this is good enough to give them the opportunity to succeeed. for one, i dont have the entitlement mentality that our spoilt youth are so embeded with.

 

I'm one of the 'spoilt youth' you're referring to and I take offence to that. Yes, we do have a few super vocal ones who complain about everything. Does that make all the youth spoilt? We don't have an entitlement mentality, all we're asking for is for the govt to tighten restrictions on the number of PMETs allowed into Singapore so that competition isn't as crazy as now. Do we want competition? Yes. Do we want too much competition as is the case now? No.

 

Also hor, we're not asking the govt to reserve all the top jobs for us. If a FT is more competent than a local, he should get it without a doubt. But you see, now the problem is, locals are steadily getting shoved out of mid and higher management positions by FTs in every sector, but especially in the IT and banking sectors. So are you trying to say that Singaporeans are completely inferior to foreigners when it comes to these jobs? And another question is, do we have enough jobs to cater to BOTH locals and FTs? I'm working in a big engineering company and I have quite a few FT colleagues. Some are damn good, some are alright and some are completely CMI. In short, they are a lot like us. Got some good ones, got some bad eggs. But the problem now is that locals, whether excellent or lousy at their job, are getting phased out in favour of a cheaper foreigner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I apologise, I mis-read your previous comment. No offense, I hope.

 

FTs might actually be suppressing wages, maybe not directly, but they provide a cheaper alternative for a similar standard of work. Then again, Walmart became one of the biggest retailers in the world by charging less for their goods, not more. I think part of the issue is, as you and some other MCF-ers have mentioned, that some of the youth have entitlement mentality, wanting a higher salary for being a Singaporean, or complaining about FTs being able to afford the same service at a lower cost. But the other part of the issue is also that not all employes look at value, but at cost.

 

If person A costs $10/hour and can do 1 unit of work per hour, and person B costs $25/hour and can do 3 units of work per hour, who is more valuable to the organisation? Obviously, when it is so clear cut, it's easy to hire person B over person A. But when both are submitting their resume (both with similar levels of education and experience), and the employer sees that the asking salary of person A is lower, without thinking of the future, and whether person A (who might be a foreigner) can integrate with the organisation structure already in place as well as communicate with the rest.

 

I've been to meetings where the company has FTs who speak English, but cannot understand each other, and as an outside, I would have to translate from one form of broken English to another form of broken English. If they could both just understand each other, their productivity would be higher.

 

Sorry, talk so much until I lost my point. What I'm saying is, some employers are truly short sighted, caring more about upfront cost than overall value.

to be fair on the bold portion. On employment font, how will the management or hiring manager be able to tell that the person B can do 3 unit? and the person A can do only 1 unit?? its from the word of mouth. but if person A is better at presentation (sometimes its called lying without guilt [:p]) then there is nothing we can do. its not possible to fault him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are suppressing salary indirectly, but in certain industries also supress the cost too. if not outside workshop wont be charging only sub 100 for car servicing liao. it work both ways.

having said that, like many of us mention. its more of the lousy FT that cannot do work that we have to work with that make us feel angry and wonder why. imagine if all the FT that can do work and better than us are in PMT. how many of us will dare to voice out loudly that FW are snatching our rice bowl??

 

I don't think people will complain when cost goes down, only when it keeps going up and salaries don't rise along with it.

 

Anyway, something I heard before: Give a man a hundred dollars, and he will be happy. Give him two hundred dollars and take away a hundred and he will hate you.

 

Man will always compare themselves to others, and sometimes it causes jealousy, so from time to time, we should remind ourselves of our blessings.

 

With regards to the second portion of your comment, that's what I'm referring to when I was mentioning person A and B, cost over value. Two mediocre people who can communicate can produce more than two superstars who can't communicate. It's just that not all HR or hiring bosses see that at the onset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

thanks joseph22, you just said the obvious.

Felt it uncalled for just because people have different view to start calling people bridgant or something when in actual facts, both are the same just from different side of the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I don't think people will complain when cost goes down, only when it keeps going up and salaries don't rise along with it.

 

Anyway, something I heard before: Give a man a hundred dollars, and he will be happy. Give him two hundred dollars and take away a hundred and he will hate you.

 

Man will always compare themselves to others, and sometimes it causes jealousy, so from time to time, we should remind ourselves of our blessings.

 

With regards to the second portion of your comment, that's what I'm referring to when I was mentioning person A and B, cost over value. Two mediocre people who can communicate can produce more than two superstars who can't communicate. It's just that not all HR or hiring bosses see that at the onset.

see my posting after that. we sometimes forget that management are also human not prophet or fortune teller that can see the future. so they can only assess what they see now. so we all better learn to sell ourself :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont see how different they are from you who just come here to bash PAP.

in fact, base on the % of contribution of their post to politics. you sure look more like creating the account here to bash PAP. [rolleyes]

 

 

I'm not surprised he said that given viceroy's statements earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just over today lunch, my friend share with me his story. His FT boss 'run road' during the haze crisis (the week where psi hit 400). Applied 2 weeks leave and book an air ticket to Australia. When crisis occur, FT will 'run road' first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just over today lunch, my friend share with me his story. His FT boss 'run road' during the haze crisis (the week where psi hit 400). Applied 2 weeks leave and book an air ticket to Australia. When crisis occur, FT will 'run road' first.

 

Let's face it lah, if we could, we sinkies would run too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are suppressing salary indirectly, but in certain industries also supress the cost too. if not outside workshop wont be charging only sub 100 for car servicing liao. it work both ways.

having said that, like many of us mention. its more of the lousy FT that cannot do work that we have to work with that make us feel angry and wonder why. imagine if all the FT that can do work and better than us are in PMT. how many of us will dare to voice out loudly that FW are snatching our rice bowl??

 

i think not all FT are bad.

 

more objective observers will agree that singapore needs the foreigners.

 

what creates resentment is the fact that the way floodgate is open to subpar "talents" that either directly or indirectly take away quality jobs from locals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just over today lunch, my friend share with me his story. His FT boss 'run road' during the haze crisis (the week where psi hit 400). Applied 2 weeks leave and book an air ticket to Australia. When crisis occur, FT will 'run road' first.

 

 

dun like that say, you never read about many local also runaway meh? :huh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think not all FT are bad.

 

more objective observers will agree that singapore needs the foreigners.

 

what creates resentment is the fact that the way floodgate is open to subpar "talents" that either directly or indirectly take away quality jobs from locals.

 

The problem is 'too many too soon'. We've only had this problem in the last 10 years towards the end of GCT's rule and throughout pinky loong's rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I'm not surprised he said that given viceroy's statements earlier.

yeah and no surprise that you all newbie give me the feeling that the account are created just to spread pap bashing nia too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

i think not all FT are bad.

 

more objective observers will agree that singapore needs the foreigners.

 

what creates resentment is the fact that the way floodgate is open to subpar "talents" that either directly or indirectly take away quality jobs from locals.

thanks for helping me to summarise. :D

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...