Reckless Cyclist

[inlinesix]

23 minutes ago, Atonchia said:

Earlier I was walking along Scotts Road, saw on Ang Mo cycling..... Likely towards Novena..... Or Bt Timah road.. 

Carrying a pink toddler school backpack..... 

Ferrying like a 2year old on a seat at middle of frame.... 😱

Though both wearing helmets... Did he not realised we are not allowed to ferry another person when riding on the road? 

Seems like a daily affair... riding to childcare. 

https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/RTA1961-R3

"(3)  A child below the age of 12 years may be carried on a properly constructed seat or carrier affixed to a bicycle, trishaw or tricycle."

[inlinesix]

This morning, i left home at 6:15m and arrived home at 7:30am.

I rode towards Sentosa and back.

No bike this morning.

Traffic is very light.

[Atonchia]

43 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/RTA1961-R3

"(3)  A child below the age of 12 years may be carried on a properly constructed seat or carrier affixed to a bicycle, trishaw or tricycle."

Didn't know there was an exception on children under 12, affixed with carrier. 

I will still choose pavement if I am riding with my kid on the bike. 😅

Edited April 5, 2021 by Atonchia

[Blueray]

 

[Mustank]

2 hours ago, Atonchia said:

Didn't know there was an exception on children under 12, affixed with carrier. 

I will still choose pavement if I am riding with my kid on the bike. 😅

Am is like that one

[Lethalstrike]

Grabfood PABs/PMDs are supposedly regulated, plated and educated of the proper road usage.

Blatant riding on the expressway with self-sabo video to prove, a prime example of what a black sheep can do to the majority of the law abiding users of such mobility devices.

 

Edited April 5, 2021 by Lethalstrike

[inlinesix]

On 4/3/2021 at 11:11 PM, inlinesix said:

Even MoT visit Lamp Post 1 on bicycle 

 

[Beregond]

2 minutes ago, Lethalstrike said:

Grabfood PABs/PMDs are supposedly regulated, plated and educated of the proper road usage.

Blatant riding on the expressway with self-sabo video to prove, a prime example of a black sheep can do to the majority of the law abiding users of such mobility devices.

 

this type really must throw in jail. purposely showing off a crime. actually its a slap on our authority face.

he is telling every 1 he can commit a crime let every 1 know, and get away with it .

[Lethalstrike]

17 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

 

Easy, Mr Ong.

Slap on ARF, COE, PARF, road tax, licensing, number plate fee, insurance onto all human powered bicycles gao dim liao. 

No need to think about what fairness, easiest way out and that's what the drivers wanted 😁

After all, the group which paid the most to use the roads should have the biggest voice right? 

[Lethalstrike]

26 minutes ago, Beregond said:

this type really must throw in jail. purposely showing off a crime. actually its a slap on our authority face.

he is telling every 1 he can commit a crime let every 1 know, and get away with it .

Out of a bunch of Grabfood deliverers, there's bound to be a few goondus. And everyone will focus on these goondus and condemn the other law abiding ones. This goondu certainly deserves some serious punishment. His PAB has a number plate he also boh chup.

If authorities want to impose licensing, plates and insurance on all bicycles, they better make damn sure they have the resources to enforce and regulate properly, else nothing changes.

If not, its just simply making it more prohibitive for the other 9 to earn an honest living from Grabfood, which many had already disposed off their PABs/PMDs and switch to the conventional bicycle due to the past PMD regulation fiasco. 

 

[Beregond]

7 minutes ago, Lethalstrike said:

 condemn the other law abiding ones. 

 i dun remember me or any bro here doing this ba??

frankly if u ask me should cycling be the prefer form of transport, i raise 2 hands with u.

but take note 'transport' i mean cycling on the road for a meaningful purpose , going to work, home, cycling to shopping to buy toto to massage etc etc. u need to use the road, but u choose to cycle instead of drive. i give thumb up.

i dun approval any leisure activity like driving for fun on the road, and it include cycling for fun or leisure or sport on the road.

because that form of cycling dun help the road / traffic condition or benefit the nation as a whole.

its your personal entertainment , it should be done in a place where u wont effect or cause inconvenience.to the rest of the nation or the general public.

u see the BIG different

( anw i bet my ase majority of those leisure cyclist themself own cars and drive themself )

[Phluvcat]

1 minute ago, Beregond said:

 i dun remember me or any bro here doing this ba??

frankly if u ask me should cycling be the prefer form of transport, i raise 2 hands with u.

but take note 'transport' i mean cycling on the road for a meaningful purpose , going to work, home, cycling to shopping to buy toto to massage etc etc. u need to use the road, but u choose to cycle instead of drive. i give thumb up.

i dun approval any leisure activity like driving for fun on the road, and it include cycling for fun or leisure or sport on the road.

because that form of cycling dun help the road / traffic condition or benefit the nation as a whole.

its your personal entertainment , it should be done in a place where u wont effect or cause inconvenience.to the rest of the nation or the general public.

u see the BIG different

( anw i bet my ase majority of those leisure cyclist themself own cars and drive themself )

Aiyah faster open borders lah, then they can tour de asia all the way to bangkok...better than AMDK de tour de flance. They can do their hypermilling slipstreaming stunts behind Gojiras and Kongs, savour delicious and authentic asia foods along the way, go up highlands for 85% fresh air... 

ICA you hear me... faster make one dedicated lane for cyclists at both check points. 

[Lethalstrike]

13 minutes ago, Beregond said:

 i dun remember me or any bro here doing this ba??

frankly if u ask me should cycling be the prefer form of transport, i raise 2 hands with u.

but take note 'transport' i mean cycling on the road for a meaningful purpose , going to work, home, cycling to shopping to buy toto to massage etc etc. u need to use the road, but u choose to cycle instead of drive. i give thumb up.

i dun approval any leisure activity like driving for fun on the road, and it include cycling for fun or leisure or sport on the road.

because that form of cycling dun help the road / traffic condition or benefit the nation as a whole.

its your personal entertainment , it should be done in a place where u wont effect or cause inconvenience.to the rest of the nation or the general public.

u see the BIG different

( anw i bet my ase majority of those leisure cyclist themself own cars and drive themself )

Not referring to you of course, I'm talking about the general unkind comments towards them online whenever such videos came up😁

I'm with you that promoting cycling as a viable means of transport should be encouraged, which is what the G has already been doing. When you said you don't approve leisure cycling or driving if there is no meaningful purpose towards nation building or GDP contribution, that's a quite extreme already. So drivers no longer allowed to enjoy a cool evening drive for their new rides? Wah jialat man 🤪

Example, if we see a cyclist wearing Spandex and riding expensive road bike during peak hours on weekdays, my auto assumption is that he's a b**tard holding everyone up. But he may be cycling to work, have a change of clothes at his office, then contribute to GDP. 

But I get what you are trying to say, ultimately. It's those errand cyclists who abused the rules in the name of leisure cycling are F up. This I agree with you. 

 

[Beregond]

2 minutes ago, Lethalstrike said:

if we see a cyclist wearing Spandex and riding expensive road bike during peak hours on weekdays, my auto assumption is that he's a b**tard holding everyone up. But he may be cycling to work, have a change of clothes at his office, then contribute to GDP. 

 

i dun like it but if he is following the law.  its totally fine with me. 

to me this is not issue of cycling on the road. but a matter of principle.

i mention before last time i meet group of cyclist who stop before the filier lane where car want to filter out to expressway. the leader stop and wave cars pass. even after i pass i see my rear mirror they keep waving. 

its around 2-3 am at woodland weekend. very responsible leisure cycling on the road. 

remember the bmw crash. i keep asking why ppl pity them, cos its obvious they playing on the road get themself kill and cause trouble for every 1.

原則問題

[RH1667]

1 hour ago, Lethalstrike said:

Easy, Mr Ong.

Slap on ARF, COE, PARF, road tax, licensing, number plate fee, insurance onto all human powered bicycles gao dim liao. 

No need to think about what fairness, easiest way out and that's what the drivers wanted 😁

After all, the group which paid the most to use the roads should have the biggest voice right? 

Honestly, i do not wish or need the road cyclist to pay for any road tax or whatever.

I just wish they are regulated, have " something identifiable "  be it a number plate or a personalised vest with an identification number / tag, and of course some form of prior verification that they know our road regulation.

[Lethalstrike]

4 minutes ago, Beregond said:

i dun like it but if he is following the law.  its totally fine with me. 

to me this is not issue of cycling on the road. but a matter of principle.

i mention before last time i meet group of cyclist who stop before the filier lane where car want to filter out to expressway. the leader stop and wave cars pass. even after i pass i see my rear mirror they keep waving. 

its around 2-3 am at woodland weekend. very responsible leisure cycling on the road. 

remember the bmw crash. i keep asking why ppl pity them, cos its obvious they playing on the road get themself kill and cause trouble for every 1.

原則問題

I'm glad that you can see my point. 

In the example you witnessed along Woodlands, it's obvious where your "matter of principle" lies. It's not about using the roads for leisure or for work, it's about responsibility and obeying the law. In short, you already agreed that if leisure cycling or commuting to work is done with proper respect to other road users and the law, its fine even though you might still be a little uncomfortable that they get to share the roads, because of the presence ignorant black sheeps among the cycling community. 

We can debate this till cows come home, let's see how Ong Ye Kung is going to address the problem. Or as Phluvcat mentioned, once borders opened and travelling is allowed, many of those who just taken up cycling during COVID might just stop cycling altogether since its a 三分钟热度 phenomenon, and the AMDKs can finally boat over to Bintan or Malaysia to ride and train to their hearts content. 

 

 

[Sdf4786k]

28 minutes ago, Lethalstrike said:

Not referring to you of course, I'm talking about the general unkind comments towards them online whenever such videos came up😁

I'm with you that promoting cycling as a viable means of transport should be encouraged, which is what the G has already been doing. When you said you don't approve leisure cycling or driving if there is no meaningful purpose towards nation building or GDP contribution, that's a quite extreme already. So drivers no longer allowed to enjoy a cool evening drive for their new rides? Wah jialat man 🤪

Example, if we see a cyclist wearing Spandex and riding expensive road bike during peak hours on weekdays, my auto assumption is that he's a b**tard holding everyone up. But he may be cycling to work, have a change of clothes at his office, then contribute to GDP. 

But I get what you are trying to say, ultimately. It's those errand cyclists who abused the rules in the name of leisure cycling are F up. This I agree with you. 

 

Unfortunately, those practically free bike for rental ends up been abuse to the max .. 

[Beregond]

1 minute ago, Lethalstrike said:

I'm glad that you can see my point. 

In the example you witnessed along Woodlands, it's obvious where your "matter of principle" lies. It's not about using the roads for leisure

if u ask me , i dun approval leisure cycling even if they obey the law but cause inconvenience to others.

i cannot stop it, i wont kpkb them  if they obey the law.

but i feel these act is selfish