Jump to content


Lightbringer
 Share

Recommended Posts

"instigator" won't go scott free leh

anything that is mass sure got a leader aka trouble maker right?

 

Strike = Illegal

Mass resignation = legal

Bus drivers chose the wrong option IMO...

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

"instigator" won't go scott free leh

anything that is mass sure got a leader aka trouble maker right?

 

To instigate a legal action is not illegal... That's my perspective...

Link to post
Share on other sites

And most of us had been watching this saga before this Strike begin. -_-

 

It's appalling that some people here regarded someone's personal figments of imagination as the actual reality of SMRT's strike.I'm glad that this saga has ended. I watched with intense from day one of the strike till the end and nothing convinced me that the strike was of genuine reason. This strike was orchestrated by some petty-minded & disgruntled workers with selfish intentions for their own personal gains & gratifications. The workers on strike didn't stand on the same ground at the end of the day. This could be seen by the apology from the worker who was jailed. He was unhappy that he didn't get the raise like his malaysian perm staff and got involved in the strike. This was not about bad accommodation or changing of contract terms, etc like what they claimed in the latter part of the strike.

 

No doubt that a total of 5 china drivers would be jailed in the ensuing outcome, this incident will change the mindset of SMRT. I believe those workers who got let off in this strike won't be recontracted after their 2 years of service and SMRT won't hire china drivers on a perm employment basis like our malaysian counterparts. This is a lose-lose situation. I just hope that SMRT won't use this excuse of increased operation cost to request for fare hike from PTC. If you support the strike, pls don't complain when our public transport fare increases in the future.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow this thread turn into supporting a political party and personal attack liao [laugh]

This thread is more turning into the "intellects" differentiating themselves from the others by actually calling themselves "intellects".

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

like who? [:p]

The clues...

"The workers, both foreign and local, became unhappy, as necessarily they would. They spoke to their management. Some wrote a petition; some approached The Online Citizen; others came to the SDP for help."

 

"The reason I am acquainted with this sequence of events, which SMRT and the Manpower Ministry has pretended didn

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I've failed. I truly do not have the tolerance or patience to suffer these fools who continue to harp on an issue that has long been laid to rest and unanimously decided on a long time ago. People are still asking if strikes are good for Singapore or not!!!!!

 

It's like freaking tribesmen living in the depths of the Amazon rainforest asking if tsunamis were good for countries which were ravaged by it. And totally missing the questions that meteorologists and geologists are asking and answering in order to better understand why tsunamis happen and how we can prevent or at least predict them and dampen their damaging effects. And then throwing spears at the meterologists and geologists for not asking the same dumb questions of whether tsunamis are good or bad together with them.

 

God, it's like a horror movie come alive. [knife]

 

nice analog.. now where is that like button.. [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this a political wayang technique.

 

he could be trying to protray himself as been emotional. if you speak to him directly, you will be overwhelm by his knowledge and vision.

 

this is what my Uni Lecturer a PAP supporter tell me.

 

so if it come out of my Lecturer who is also a PAP supporter. there is much truth in it.

 

:o:o:o i cant beleive J22 is saying this!!! :o:o:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

:o:o:o i cant beleive J22 is saying this!!! :o:o:o

why cannot believe me for saying this.. the first line i say one. the 2nd line not i say one.

sorry the following i say one.

 

All this a political wayang technique.

 

he could be trying to protray himself as been emotional.

Edited by Joseph22
Link to post
Share on other sites

his lecturer say wan... he just repeat lah.. chey.. [:p]

oie.. i never talk to him of course i cannot say lah.

 

give me some face can or not. :D

Edited by Joseph22
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is really an eye openess with so many highly educate forumers with great vision/insight postings. [thumbsup] Indeed I did Learnt quite a fair bit from most of the posts here. On the whole it took me at least 45min to finish the whole TS article. [bigcry] Bo pian..pardon mine inadquate academic background to fully comprehend the article.

 

Just one question that is lingering on my mind. Do china transport industry indeed pay much better than singapore counterpart?

 

Adjust the pay for PPP first, and we shall see. But the sheer number of foreign bus drivers from China here tends to indicate that there is indeed quite a significant difference in PPP-adjusted pay for this job in both countries, won't it? Or at the very least, a significant lack of similarly-paid opportunities in China.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not fan of PAP... but he use PAP tactics... cannot convince? spread fear... you want your wife to work as maids???

:D

 

I love this line, never fail to LOL when somebody brings it up again.

 

Fear mongering usually works best on the selfish and the weak-minded. Plenty of examples here. [thumbsup]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...