Jump to content

Singapore Reckless Drivers Thread part III


Sofarsogood
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks serious injury

 

 

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS...  ^_^

 

 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS... ^_^

 

 

 

Whoa!!! Really got many people come and help!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS...  ^_^

 

 

stupid accident.

 

great kampong spirit [;)]

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS... ^_^

 

 

 

人之初, 性本善 .
  • Praise 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS...  ^_^

 

 

Women commentator sounds like thai or vietnamese

Link to post
Share on other sites

Video showing many drivers coming to help the driver and passengers of the white vezel which overturned near MBS...  ^_^

 

 

 

I watch the video and suddenly had a thought that if there is a toddler/infant in the car, even if strap down in $10,000 child seat/baby chair also unimaginable what injury the toddler/infant could have sustain  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fug these JB bikers... treat it as nothing happen... Poor taxi uncle trying to stop him..

 

Did the rider drop his balls & faster run away?

Link to post
Share on other sites

More like he didn't give a damn and felt there was nothing to it..

Trying to run away to prevent paying damages..n most likely riding without insurance too.. Dunno even got licence or not Edited by Lurpsexx
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I watch the video and suddenly had a thought that if there is a toddler/infant in the car, even if strap down in $10,000 child seat/baby chair also unimaginable what injury the toddler/infant could have sustain

A child seat supposed to keep the child in the seat out he was properly secured.
Link to post
Share on other sites

With so much software in cars now, the manufacturer should consider writing a program to prevent drivers from turning the steering wheels too much (to make a lane change or turn) if they have not toggle the signal stick.

 

Yes, and then said manufacturer should consider the massive class action lawsuit that'll surely be on its way because people couldn't take emergency avoiding action with this "safety feature".

 

I prefer to have full control of my car, thank you. I don't even like the stupid ass feature that brakes for me if the car thinks I'm getting too close to the car in front of me, but I can't seem to do anything about it, all these irritating nanny features are so deeply entrenched into modern cars' electronic brains nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

decarbonised already can shift engine power band.

 

first time i hear.....mmmmhh :slow:

Maybe he bought the Lexus used and engine is coated with carbon very lag....
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and then said manufacturer should consider the massive class action lawsuit that'll surely be on its way because people couldn't take emergency avoiding action with this "safety feature".

 

I prefer to have full control of my car, thank you. I don't even like the stupid ass feature that brakes for me if the car thinks I'm getting too close to the car in front of me, but I can't seem to do anything about it, all these irritating nanny features are so deeply entrenched into modern cars' electronic brains nowadays.

 

Good points.

 

With all this new stuff manufacturers of anything with electronics connected seem to be of the mind 'we can do it so they must want it', not 'we can do it but does it akchewlee improve anything and if someone doesn't want it can we make it so they can turn that feature off'.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and then said manufacturer should consider the massive class action lawsuit that'll surely be on its way because people couldn't take emergency avoiding action with this "safety feature".

 

I prefer to have full control of my car, thank you. I don't even like the stupid ass feature that brakes for me if the car thinks I'm getting too close to the car in front of me, but I can't seem to do anything about it, all these irritating nanny features are so deeply entrenched into modern cars' electronic brains nowadays.

 

I find that all these gadgets and features make the car and driver "retarded". 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Trying to run away to prevent paying damages..n most likely riding without insurance too.. Dunno even got licence or not

 

These people just come in quickly into our country to earn the exchange rate..come in get out quick and... to do that.... they need to ride fast and dangerously... [laugh]

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Yes, and then said manufacturer should consider the massive class action lawsuit that'll surely be on its way because people couldn't take emergency avoiding action with this "safety feature".

 

I prefer to have full control of my car, thank you. I don't even like the stupid ass feature that brakes for me if the car thinks I'm getting too close to the car in front of me, but I can't seem to do anything about it, all these irritating nanny features are so deeply entrenched into modern cars' electronic brains nowadays.

 

Most of the time active braking can be disabled and almost all of them are programmed to only intervene at the absolute last moment.

I've never had mine intervene before I take my own action, be it swerving or braking of my own accord.

Edited by 7hm
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...