Parliament debate 2020/2021

[Mkl22]

48 minutes ago, Fcw75 said:

Ex-general and a few others vs Jamus Lim.

https://mothership.sg/2020/09/pap-mp-jamus-minimum-wage/

let’s see how they fall flat on their faces. 

[RadX]

41 minutes ago, Mason016 said:

All aiming to be the first for Jamus' scalp.

Tharman had to step in

 

hopeless

 

need big bro to halp 

[Fcw75]

4 minutes ago, RadX said:

Tharman had to step in

 

hopeless

 

need big bro to halp 

So in the end, 4G still need the help of 3G eh? Can’t even feud for themselves. Free riders!

[Mockngbrd]

Wait they cry den u know

[Mustank]

 

[Mason016]

31 minutes ago, RadX said:

Tharman had to step in

 

hopeless

 

need big bro to halp 

Ok lah give chance lah. One lawyer, one engineer, one accontant, one psychology, one from LSE and say bachelor of science; hard fight lah; need the real LSE economist to come in. 

[Volvobrick]

1 hour ago, Fcw75 said:

Ex-general and a few others vs Jamus Lim.

https://mothership.sg/2020/09/pap-mp-jamus-minimum-wage/

So was Tharman defending for the little puppies? ie they were saying this cannot, that cannot, cos some sectors unproductive and cannot afford minimum wage? 

[Wt_know]

 

Edited September 3, 2020 by Wt_know

[Albeniz]

46 minutes ago, Fcw75 said:

So in the end, 4G still need the help of 3G eh? Can’t even feud for themselves. Free riders!

I have more confidence in some of our mcfers running the country than the 4Gs.

No direct/relevant experience.

[RadX]

Wow

[Fcw75]

I am not a free rider too.

I voted for WP and I do not want PAP to be govt. 

 

Edited September 3, 2020 by Fcw75

[Fcw75]

1 hour ago, Mason016 said:

Ok lah give chance lah. One lawyer, one engineer, one accontant, one psychology, one from LSE and say bachelor of science; hard fight lah; need the real LSE economist to come in. 

The whole debate if anyone is keen.

 

[Fcw75]

[Strat]

2 hours ago, Mustank said:

 

 

East coast MRT Plans....

[RH1667]

I wish they bring back live telecast of parliamentary debate. 

[Mkl22]

13 minutes ago, RH1667 said:

I wish they bring back live telecast of parliamentary debate. 

tan ku ku... edited version already cannot perform.... if live... lagi be a laughing stock.

[13177]

2 hours ago, Mason016 said:

Ok lah give chance lah. One lawyer, one engineer, one accontant, one psychology, one from LSE and say bachelor of science; hard fight lah; need the real LSE economist to come in. 

So many against one, can say bully or not? 😂

[Ct3833]

On 9/2/2020 at 6:30 PM, Voodooman said:

I am surprised to hear some PAP backbenchers supporting an EP quota and the minister saying it is not unthinkable (just not wise)... 

We now have a debate and G can then try to convince everyone why we should not go there and what measures will be taken to safeguard local jobs. If you don't deliver, then be prepared to answer to the voters during next GE and lose a few more GRCs. 

60% gave them the mandate, so bobian.  

They can continuen to defend how important the FTs or foreign PMETs are. They should not get themselves confused ,  no one is asking for zero FTs,  we  are asking that a limit of FTs be imposed. They can argue by saying how many more jobs have been created over the years, fact is people are feeling the pressure, people are not able to get a job, so good job PAP, the question  is how could you do better to help  the people? If they continue to defend the issue,  they will not likely to do anything about it,  4 years later, the 30s today will be 30s +4 the 40s today will be 40s +4, more will be booted out of their jobs in favor of FTs,  letting one the international competition  is going to be a lot more intense, more will be jobless, the GE outcome will not be 60% for sure. Unless they screw up only this social issue and do very well in many other aspects，which i am doubtful about it.

The more acceptable  respond should be for them to look into rebalancingn local jobs vs FTs. Defensive discussion is not going to help them. 

No  problems can be resolved by crying. 

Edited September 3, 2020 by Ct3833