Jump to content

[Error] Mazda & Vezel Thread


Poortraveller
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hypersonic

I would go for this SUV if the COE drops....

 

Been looking for a small SUV...toyota Rush and Daihatsu Terios are old school compact SUVs and interior is too plain...not as nice as this..

Small SUV? CX5 consider one?
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

Think it is common to find car comes with CVT engine now. You cannot escape from it. But this car 1.5L, should be underpower?

Agree now. The Jippun are like all going for cvt. Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Suzuki, Subaru.

 

But at least now, its programmed to operate like a 7AT with pre-set virtual ratios even in D mode. At least that was what was claimed in the review for Altis. Also claimed dont have initial lag that plagues many cvt.

 

My guess is that power wise should be like Honda Freed or slightly better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Think it is common to find car comes with CVT engine now. You cannot escape from it. But this car 1.5L, should be underpower?

One reason why I will take korean made with 6at then a thai/japan made with cvt..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cat A? Haha... Now that so many brands & models are TCed, come Feb very few cars will stay in Cat A.

 

Will local agent bring in the diesel engine option? I doubt they will. But good if they do.

 

Btw for those wondering. I think this car is on the Honda City platform with the 1.5L petrol and diesel engine options available for Asia market. Manual transmission and 5speed auto for the gearbox options.

 

It looks rather big, if in Cat A (less than 130hp), I think will be under-powered. Looking nice without sufficient power is sian....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic
(edited)

129bhp and doing 20km/l, not bad at all in my opinion. Comparable to a Prius.

But realistically, if can safely get 13-14 (2/3 of their claim) is a step forward.

What's a CVT engine?

 

CVT is the transmission.

 

Eg, Jazz 1.3, Trans = 5 speed auto

 

Fit 1.3, Trans = CVT.

The design is nice, only turn off is CVT. I have no faith in Honda CVT.

Able to share details on this?

 

Coz if I get a 2nd hand 2yrs later, a Gen 4 City idsi with cvt is actually on my hit list. Tia.

Edited by Baal
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Small SUV? CX5 consider one?

 

Hmm...seems big...then engine cap is 2.2L...i rather go for a 1.5L engine cap...

But realistically, if can safely get 13-14 (2/3 of their claim) is a step forward.

 

CVT is the transmission.

 

Eg, Jazz 1.3, Trans = 5 speed auto

 

Fit 1.3, Trans = CVT.

Able to share details on this?

 

Coz if I get a 2nd hand 2yrs later, a Gen 4 City idsi with cvt is actually on my hit list. Tia.

 

why is CVT not good? I driving a Honda Fit 1.3A now.is CVT..but still ok I feel...pick up is not that powerful..but I'm ok with it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

 

Hmm...seems big...then engine cap is 2.2L...i rather go for a 1.5L engine cap...

 

why is CVT not good? I driving a Honda Fit 1.3A now.is CVT..but still ok I feel...pick up is not that powerful..but I'm ok with it..

 

While its very fuel efficient & torquey, durability wise, its 1 notch below a traditional AT.

Needs more TLC than an AT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

 

While its very fuel efficient & torquey, durability wise, its 1 notch below a traditional AT.

Needs more TLC than an AT.

 

Sorry..not a pro in auto terms..what is TLC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

 

Sorry..not a pro in auto terms..what is TLC?

 

no prob, I'm also no guru.

 

TLC = Tender Loving Care.

 

Eg, if u upsize ur rims, have the habit of accelerating hard frequently, wear & tear would set in earlier as oppose to an AT doing the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But realistically, if can safely get 13-14 (2/3 of their claim) is a step forward.

 

CVT is the transmission.

 

Eg, Jazz 1.3, Trans = 5 speed auto

 

Fit 1.3, Trans = CVT.

Able to share details on this?

 

Coz if I get a 2nd hand 2yrs later, a Gen 4 City idsi with cvt is actually on my hit list. Tia.

 

My previous car was a Jazz and I drove for 4 yrs. I didn't like the rubber band feel of CVT GB, iDSI engine is good, good low end torque and low FC. Read many complains from SHC and FJC about the CVT GB problem. Even the earlier badge of Civic ES model with 1.5L engine with CVT GB also had many issue on GB.

Subsequently, the later facelift Civic were 1.6L and normal AT GB. At one point, it was obvious that Honda was moving away from CVT, their later Jazz/Fit model, City and Civic were normal AT. I think only Airwave continue to use CVT.

I have reserve about CVT especially from Honda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we say that the only 'trusted' CVT is from mitsubishi? Cause i think mitsubishi has been using CVT donkey years ago.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...